Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Clinical and Biomedical Research |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of urinary total protein measurements intimed 24-h urine collection and in a diurnal random urine specimen for the screeningand diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 diabetic patients (20 type 1 and 147 type2 diabetic patients; 78 women and 89 men), aged 20-84 years, collected 217 timed24-h urine specimens. Albumin was measured by immunoturbidimetry, total proteinby the sulfosalicylic acid technique, and creatinine by Jaffé’s method. According tothe timed 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate, samples were divided into three groups:normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate < 20 mg/min; n = 84),microalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate 20-200 mg/min; n = 78), andmacroalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate > 200 mg/min; n = 55). Eight-sixpatients also collected 105 random urine specimens (normoalbuminuric, n = 47;microalbuminuric, n = 37; macroalbuminuric, n = 21), and urinary protein concentrationand urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio were measured. The receiver operatingcharacteristics curve approach was used to analyze the performance of the diagnostictests.RESULTS: Spearman’s coefficient of correlation of 24-h urinary albumin excretionrate versus 24-h urinary protein was 0.95 ( P < 0.001), and of 24-h urinary albuminexcretion rate versus urinary protein concentration and urinary protein-to-creatinineratio were 0.77 and 0.72, respectively (P < 0.001). The calculated areas (±SEM)under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the diagnosis of overt diabeticnephropathy were 0.9987 ± 0.001 for 24-h urinary protein, 0.9926 ± 0.006 for urinaryprotein concentration, and 0.9751 ± 0.014 for urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio. Inthe receiver operating characteristics curves, the first points with 100% sensivitywere 541 mg (95.7% specificity) for 24-h urinary protein, 431 mg/l (92.9% specificity)for urinary protein concentration, and 0.2 (76.2% specificity) for urinary protein-tocreatinine ratio.CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of proteinuria presented almost perfect accuracyfor the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy. Protein measurementin spot urine is a reliable and simple method for the screening and diagnosis of overtdiabetic nephropathy. |
id |
UFRGS-20_172aec7f9736b3afbb4c5db9348414f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/124652 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-20 |
network_name_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathyProteinúria ainda é útil para triagem e diagnóstico de nefropatia diabética sintomáticaOBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of urinary total protein measurements intimed 24-h urine collection and in a diurnal random urine specimen for the screeningand diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 diabetic patients (20 type 1 and 147 type2 diabetic patients; 78 women and 89 men), aged 20-84 years, collected 217 timed24-h urine specimens. Albumin was measured by immunoturbidimetry, total proteinby the sulfosalicylic acid technique, and creatinine by Jaffé’s method. According tothe timed 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate, samples were divided into three groups:normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate < 20 mg/min; n = 84),microalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate 20-200 mg/min; n = 78), andmacroalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate > 200 mg/min; n = 55). Eight-sixpatients also collected 105 random urine specimens (normoalbuminuric, n = 47;microalbuminuric, n = 37; macroalbuminuric, n = 21), and urinary protein concentrationand urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio were measured. The receiver operatingcharacteristics curve approach was used to analyze the performance of the diagnostictests.RESULTS: Spearman’s coefficient of correlation of 24-h urinary albumin excretionrate versus 24-h urinary protein was 0.95 ( P < 0.001), and of 24-h urinary albuminexcretion rate versus urinary protein concentration and urinary protein-to-creatinineratio were 0.77 and 0.72, respectively (P < 0.001). The calculated areas (±SEM)under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the diagnosis of overt diabeticnephropathy were 0.9987 ± 0.001 for 24-h urinary protein, 0.9926 ± 0.006 for urinaryprotein concentration, and 0.9751 ± 0.014 for urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio. Inthe receiver operating characteristics curves, the first points with 100% sensivitywere 541 mg (95.7% specificity) for 24-h urinary protein, 431 mg/l (92.9% specificity)for urinary protein concentration, and 0.2 (76.2% specificity) for urinary protein-tocreatinine ratio.CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of proteinuria presented almost perfect accuracyfor the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy. Protein measurementin spot urine is a reliable and simple method for the screening and diagnosis of overtdiabetic nephropathy.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a utilização de medições de proteína urinária total em coletasurinárias de 24 horas e em amostras diurnas coletadas aleatoriamente para triageme diagnóstico de nefropatia diabética sintomática. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Foram coletadas 217 amostras de urina a cada 24 h deum total de 167 pacientes diabéticos (20 pacientes com diabetes tipo 1 e 147 comdiabetes tipo 2; 78 mulheres e 89 homens), com idade entre 20 e 84 anos. A albuminafoi medida por imunoturbidimetria, a proteína urinário total foi medida pela técnicado ácido sulfosalicílico e a creatinina, pelo método de Jaffe. As amostras foramdivididas em três grupos de acordo com a taxa de 24 h de excreção urinária dealbumina: normoalbuminúricos (taxa de excreção urinária de albumina < 20 mg/min;n=84), microalbuminúricos (taxa de excreção urinária de albumina 20-200 mg/min;n=78), e macroalbuminúricos (taxa de excreção urinária de albumina > 200 mg/min;n=55). Foram coletadas ainda 105 amostras aleatórias de urina de 86 pacientes(normoalbuminúricos, n=47; microalbuminúricos, n=37; macroalbuminúricos, n=21),das quais a concentração urinária de proteina e a relação proteína/creatinina urináriaforam obtidas. O método da curva de características operacionais do receptor foiutilizado para analisar o desempenho dos testes diagnósticos.RESULTADOS: O coeficiente de correlação de Spearman para a comparação entrea taxa de 24 h de excreção urinária de albumina e a proteina urinária de 24 h foi 0,95(P < 0,001). O mesmo coeficiente, para a comparação da taxa de 24 h de excreçãourinária de albumina com a concentração urinária de proteina, assim como com arelação proteína/creatinina urinária foi 0,77 e 0,72, respectivamente (P < 0,001). Asáreas calculadas (+ erro padrão) abaixo da curva de características operacionais doreceptor para o diagnóstico de nefropatia diabética sintomática foram: 0,9987 + 0,001para a proteina urinária de 24 h; 0,9926 + 0,006 para concentração urinária deproteína; e 0,9751 + 0,014 para a relação proteina/creatinina urinária. Nas curvasde características operacionais do receptor os primeiros pontos com 100% desensitividade foram: 541mg (95,7% de especificidade) para proteína urinária de 24h, 431 mg/l (92,9% de especificidade) para concentração urinária, e 0,2 (76,2% deespecificidade) para a relação proteína/creatinina urinária.CONCLUSÕES: As medidas de proteinuria foram extremamente eficazes na triageme no diagnóstico de nefropatia diabética sintomática. A medição de proteína urináriaé um método confiável e simples para a triagem e diagnóstico de nefropatia diabéticasintomáticaHCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2022-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionA Convite dos Editoresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 18 No. 2 (1998): Revista HCPAClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 18 n. 2 (1998): Revista HCPA2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652/84914http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZelmanovitz, Themis L. Gross, Jorge Oliveira, JarbasJ. de Azevedo, Mirela 2022-09-16T16:32:21Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/124652Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2022-09-16T16:32:21Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy Proteinúria ainda é útil para triagem e diagnóstico de nefropatia diabética sintomática |
title |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
spellingShingle |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy Zelmanovitz, Themis |
title_short |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
title_full |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
title_fullStr |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
title_sort |
Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy |
author |
Zelmanovitz, Themis |
author_facet |
Zelmanovitz, Themis L. Gross, Jorge Oliveira, Jarbas J. de Azevedo, Mirela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
L. Gross, Jorge Oliveira, Jarbas J. de Azevedo, Mirela |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zelmanovitz, Themis L. Gross, Jorge Oliveira, Jarbas J. de Azevedo, Mirela |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of urinary total protein measurements intimed 24-h urine collection and in a diurnal random urine specimen for the screeningand diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 diabetic patients (20 type 1 and 147 type2 diabetic patients; 78 women and 89 men), aged 20-84 years, collected 217 timed24-h urine specimens. Albumin was measured by immunoturbidimetry, total proteinby the sulfosalicylic acid technique, and creatinine by Jaffé’s method. According tothe timed 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate, samples were divided into three groups:normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate < 20 mg/min; n = 84),microalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate 20-200 mg/min; n = 78), andmacroalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate > 200 mg/min; n = 55). Eight-sixpatients also collected 105 random urine specimens (normoalbuminuric, n = 47;microalbuminuric, n = 37; macroalbuminuric, n = 21), and urinary protein concentrationand urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio were measured. The receiver operatingcharacteristics curve approach was used to analyze the performance of the diagnostictests.RESULTS: Spearman’s coefficient of correlation of 24-h urinary albumin excretionrate versus 24-h urinary protein was 0.95 ( P < 0.001), and of 24-h urinary albuminexcretion rate versus urinary protein concentration and urinary protein-to-creatinineratio were 0.77 and 0.72, respectively (P < 0.001). The calculated areas (±SEM)under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the diagnosis of overt diabeticnephropathy were 0.9987 ± 0.001 for 24-h urinary protein, 0.9926 ± 0.006 for urinaryprotein concentration, and 0.9751 ± 0.014 for urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio. Inthe receiver operating characteristics curves, the first points with 100% sensivitywere 541 mg (95.7% specificity) for 24-h urinary protein, 431 mg/l (92.9% specificity)for urinary protein concentration, and 0.2 (76.2% specificity) for urinary protein-tocreatinine ratio.CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of proteinuria presented almost perfect accuracyfor the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy. Protein measurementin spot urine is a reliable and simple method for the screening and diagnosis of overtdiabetic nephropathy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion A Convite dos Editores |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652/84914 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 18 No. 2 (1998): Revista HCPA Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 18 n. 2 (1998): Revista HCPA 2357-9730 reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
collection |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cbr@hcpa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799767056768303104 |