Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da F. Mossmann, Diego
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: G. Meinhardt Jr., Jorge, S. Zylbersztejn, Daniel, Hauck, Simone, F. Vieiro, Priscila, J. Ramos, Maurício, Argenta, Rodrigo, Freitas, Daniel, C. Adamatti, Luis Carlos, Backes, Ariane Nadia, B. Osvaldt, Alessandro, P. Bersch, Vivian, Rohde, Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Clinical and Biomedical Research
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. Our objective was to assess the results of LC in comparison with previous data published in 1994.PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 1999, 2,300 patients were submitted to surgery at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The medical records of 1,540 of these patients were assessed retrospectively. The variables evaluated were preoperative diagnosis, duration of hospital stay and of surgery, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery, and anatomicopathological examination of the gallbladder.RESULTS: The most common preoperative diagnosis was of symptomatic gallstones (92%); the average hospital stay was of 3.6 ± 6 days (median of 2 days); the average duration of surgery was of 89.5 ± 38 minutes; the most frequent intraoperative complications were gallbladder rupture (7.3%), calculi in peritoneum (0.8%), and iatrogenic bile duct injury (0.2%); and the postoperative complications reported were wound infection (1.3%), retained stones (0.6%), and biliary peritonitis (0.5%). The conversion rate to open procedure was of 2.5%, and reoperation was necessary in 1.8% of cases. There was only one death (0.06%).CONCLUSION: In comparison to data from a previous experience, there has been an improvement in LC results, but additional technical improvements can still be made. 
id UFRGS-20_504a4ec7c6084fcaf3aa78b41988feed
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125705
network_acronym_str UFRGS-20
network_name_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto AlegreAnálise de colecistectomias videolaparoscópicas no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreColelitíaselaparoscopiacolecistectomiaCholelithiasislaparoscopyOBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. Our objective was to assess the results of LC in comparison with previous data published in 1994.PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 1999, 2,300 patients were submitted to surgery at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The medical records of 1,540 of these patients were assessed retrospectively. The variables evaluated were preoperative diagnosis, duration of hospital stay and of surgery, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery, and anatomicopathological examination of the gallbladder.RESULTS: The most common preoperative diagnosis was of symptomatic gallstones (92%); the average hospital stay was of 3.6 ± 6 days (median of 2 days); the average duration of surgery was of 89.5 ± 38 minutes; the most frequent intraoperative complications were gallbladder rupture (7.3%), calculi in peritoneum (0.8%), and iatrogenic bile duct injury (0.2%); and the postoperative complications reported were wound infection (1.3%), retained stones (0.6%), and biliary peritonitis (0.5%). The conversion rate to open procedure was of 2.5%, and reoperation was necessary in 1.8% of cases. There was only one death (0.06%).CONCLUSION: In comparison to data from a previous experience, there has been an improvement in LC results, but additional technical improvements can still be made. OBJETIVO: A colecistectomia videolaparoscópica (CVL) é o tratamento preferencial da colelitíase. O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar os resultados da CVL comparando com a experiência inicial relatada em 1994.PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: De 1992 a 1999 foram operados 2.300 pacientes no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Deste total foram revisados retrospectivamente 1.540 prontuários. As variáveis analisadas foram a indicação cirúrgica, o tempo de internação hospitalar e cirúrgico, as complicações trans e pós-operatórias, a taxa de conversão para cirurgia aberta e o exame anatomopatológico da vesícula biliar.RESULTADOS: A principal indicação de cirurgia foi a colelitíase sintomática (92%). O tempo de internação hospitalar foi 3,6 ± 6 dias e a mediana de 2 dias e o tempo cirúrgico médio de 89,5 ± 38 minutos. As principais complicações intra-operatórias foram a perfuração da vesícula biliar (7,3%), a queda de cálculos na cavidade (0,8%) e lesão iatrogênica de via biliar (0,2%). No pós-operatório, as complicações mais freqüentes foram a infecção de ferida operatória (1,3%), a coledocolitíase residual (0,6%) e o coleperitônio (0,5%). A taxa de conversão foi de 2,5% e de reoperação de 1,8%. Houve apenas um óbito (0,06%).CONCLUSÕES: Em relação à experiência inicial, a CVL evoluiu muito, mas ainda pode ser aprimorada tecnicamente.  HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2022-07-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2001): Revista HCPAClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 21 n. 1 (2001): Revista HCPA2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705/85363http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda F. Mossmann, Diego G. Meinhardt Jr., Jorge S. Zylbersztejn, Daniel Hauck, Simone F. Vieiro, Priscila J. Ramos, Maurício Argenta, Rodrigo Freitas, DanielC. Adamatti, Luis Carlos Backes, Ariane Nadia B. Osvaldt, Alessandro P. Bersch, Vivian Rohde, Luiz 2022-07-07T12:08:14Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125705Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2022-07-07T12:08:14Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Análise de colecistectomias videolaparoscópicas no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
title Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
spellingShingle Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
da F. Mossmann, Diego
Colelitíase
laparoscopia
colecistectomia
Cholelithiasis
laparoscopy
title_short Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
title_full Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
title_fullStr Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
title_sort Assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures at the Hospital Clínicas de Porto Alegre
author da F. Mossmann, Diego
author_facet da F. Mossmann, Diego
G. Meinhardt Jr., Jorge
S. Zylbersztejn, Daniel
Hauck, Simone
F. Vieiro, Priscila
J. Ramos, Maurício
Argenta, Rodrigo
Freitas, Daniel
C. Adamatti, Luis Carlos
Backes, Ariane Nadia
B. Osvaldt, Alessandro
P. Bersch, Vivian
Rohde, Luiz
author_role author
author2 G. Meinhardt Jr., Jorge
S. Zylbersztejn, Daniel
Hauck, Simone
F. Vieiro, Priscila
J. Ramos, Maurício
Argenta, Rodrigo
Freitas, Daniel
C. Adamatti, Luis Carlos
Backes, Ariane Nadia
B. Osvaldt, Alessandro
P. Bersch, Vivian
Rohde, Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da F. Mossmann, Diego
G. Meinhardt Jr., Jorge
S. Zylbersztejn, Daniel
Hauck, Simone
F. Vieiro, Priscila
J. Ramos, Maurício
Argenta, Rodrigo
Freitas, Daniel
C. Adamatti, Luis Carlos
Backes, Ariane Nadia
B. Osvaldt, Alessandro
P. Bersch, Vivian
Rohde, Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colelitíase
laparoscopia
colecistectomia
Cholelithiasis
laparoscopy
topic Colelitíase
laparoscopia
colecistectomia
Cholelithiasis
laparoscopy
description OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. Our objective was to assess the results of LC in comparison with previous data published in 1994.PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 1999, 2,300 patients were submitted to surgery at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The medical records of 1,540 of these patients were assessed retrospectively. The variables evaluated were preoperative diagnosis, duration of hospital stay and of surgery, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rate to open surgery, and anatomicopathological examination of the gallbladder.RESULTS: The most common preoperative diagnosis was of symptomatic gallstones (92%); the average hospital stay was of 3.6 ± 6 days (median of 2 days); the average duration of surgery was of 89.5 ± 38 minutes; the most frequent intraoperative complications were gallbladder rupture (7.3%), calculi in peritoneum (0.8%), and iatrogenic bile duct injury (0.2%); and the postoperative complications reported were wound infection (1.3%), retained stones (0.6%), and biliary peritonitis (0.5%). The conversion rate to open procedure was of 2.5%, and reoperation was necessary in 1.8% of cases. There was only one death (0.06%).CONCLUSION: In comparison to data from a previous experience, there has been an improvement in LC results, but additional technical improvements can still be made. 
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125705/85363
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2001): Revista HCPA
Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 21 n. 1 (2001): Revista HCPA
2357-9730
reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
collection Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cbr@hcpa.edu.br
_version_ 1799767057401643008