PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcon, Gabriela Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Dutra, Ademar, Ensslin, Leonardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: ConTexto
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636
Resumo: This paper aims to build a performance evaluation model for public pension litigation to support the management of the Federal Attorney in Santa Catarina. To achieve this goal, this research, with both qualitative and quantitative approach, sought data on interviews with the manager of the area, in addition to the analysis of documents used in the institution. Because it is a complex situation, involving several variables, constructivist Multicriteria methodology for decision support (MCDA-C) was used in order to structure and build knowledge and evaluate the objectives and suggest improvement actions. This research focuses on the structuring phase of the model and its recommendations. It resulted in a performance evaluation model containing two major areas of concern, six key points of view and nine elementary points of view from which descriptors were built, that allowed the current profile view of performance of pension litigation. In addition, the model developed allowed us to identify opportunities for institutional improvement.
id UFRGS-23_0e3dbfdce0e5833c64c9328793046ea2
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/67636
network_acronym_str UFRGS-23
network_name_str ConTexto
repository_id_str
spelling PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEYAVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DAS ATIVIDADES DO CONTENCIOSO PREVIDENCIÁRIO: O CASO DA PROCURADORIA FEDERALAvaliação de DesempenhoMetodologia MCDA-CSetor PúblicoProcuradoriaPerformance evaluationMCDA-C methodologyPublic sectorFederal attorneyThis paper aims to build a performance evaluation model for public pension litigation to support the management of the Federal Attorney in Santa Catarina. To achieve this goal, this research, with both qualitative and quantitative approach, sought data on interviews with the manager of the area, in addition to the analysis of documents used in the institution. Because it is a complex situation, involving several variables, constructivist Multicriteria methodology for decision support (MCDA-C) was used in order to structure and build knowledge and evaluate the objectives and suggest improvement actions. This research focuses on the structuring phase of the model and its recommendations. It resulted in a performance evaluation model containing two major areas of concern, six key points of view and nine elementary points of view from which descriptors were built, that allowed the current profile view of performance of pension litigation. In addition, the model developed allowed us to identify opportunities for institutional improvement.O presente estudo teve como objetivo construir um modelo de avaliação do desempenho da atuação contenciosa em matéria previdenciária para apoiar a gestão da Procuradoria Federal em Santa Catarina. Para atingir tal objetivo, esta pesquisa, de natureza qualitativa e quantitativa, buscou dados em entrevistas junto ao gestor da área, além da análise de documentos utilizados na instituição. Por se tratar de uma situação complexa, envolvendo diversas variáveis, a metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão Construtivista (MCDA-C) foi utilizada, com o objetivo de estruturar e construir conhecimento, bem como avaliar os objetivos e sugerir ações de aperfeiçoamento. A pesquisa ateve-se às fases de Estruturação e Recomendação da metodologia e teve como resultado um modelo de avaliação contendo duas grandes áreas de preocupação, seis pontos de vista fundamentais e nove pontos de vista elementares, a partir dos quais foram construídos descritores que permitiram a visualização do perfil atual de desempenho do contencioso previdenciário. Além disto, o modelo desenvolvido permitiu identificar oportunidades de melhoria e aperfeiçoamento institucional.UFRGS2018-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 17 n. 35 (2017): jan./abr. 20172175-87511676-6016reponame:ConTextoinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 ConTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarcon, Gabriela AlmeidaDutra, AdemarEnsslin, Leonardo2018-03-14T15:30:50Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/67636Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/indexPUBhttpw://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/oaifernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br2175-87511676-6016opendoar:2018-03-14T15:30:50ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
AVALIAÇÃO DO DESEMPENHO DAS ATIVIDADES DO CONTENCIOSO PREVIDENCIÁRIO: O CASO DA PROCURADORIA FEDERAL
title PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
spellingShingle PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
Marcon, Gabriela Almeida
Avaliação de Desempenho
Metodologia MCDA-C
Setor Público
Procuradoria
Performance evaluation
MCDA-C methodology
Public sector
Federal attorney
title_short PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
title_full PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
title_fullStr PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
title_full_unstemmed PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
title_sort PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PUBLIC PENSION LITIGATION: THE CASE OF THE FEDERAL ATTORNEY
author Marcon, Gabriela Almeida
author_facet Marcon, Gabriela Almeida
Dutra, Ademar
Ensslin, Leonardo
author_role author
author2 Dutra, Ademar
Ensslin, Leonardo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcon, Gabriela Almeida
Dutra, Ademar
Ensslin, Leonardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação de Desempenho
Metodologia MCDA-C
Setor Público
Procuradoria
Performance evaluation
MCDA-C methodology
Public sector
Federal attorney
topic Avaliação de Desempenho
Metodologia MCDA-C
Setor Público
Procuradoria
Performance evaluation
MCDA-C methodology
Public sector
Federal attorney
description This paper aims to build a performance evaluation model for public pension litigation to support the management of the Federal Attorney in Santa Catarina. To achieve this goal, this research, with both qualitative and quantitative approach, sought data on interviews with the manager of the area, in addition to the analysis of documents used in the institution. Because it is a complex situation, involving several variables, constructivist Multicriteria methodology for decision support (MCDA-C) was used in order to structure and build knowledge and evaluate the objectives and suggest improvement actions. This research focuses on the structuring phase of the model and its recommendations. It resulted in a performance evaluation model containing two major areas of concern, six key points of view and nine elementary points of view from which descriptors were built, that allowed the current profile view of performance of pension litigation. In addition, the model developed allowed us to identify opportunities for institutional improvement.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/67636/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 ConTexto
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 ConTexto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 17 n. 35 (2017): jan./abr. 2017
2175-8751
1676-6016
reponame:ConTexto
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str ConTexto
collection ConTexto
repository.name.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766350195851265

Registros relacionados