DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Rossana Guerra de
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Paulo, Edilson, Silva, César Augusto Tibúrcio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: ConTexto
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362
Resumo: This study aimed at examining the occurrence of motivated sensitivity in the analyses of economical, financial and patrimonial information carried out by Brazilian government auditors, which results from the influence of linguistic preference in their processing. Methodology used was field experiment: two groups formed at random were exposed to the manipulation of the linguistic variable (textual and numerical). Subjects were government auditors from an agency in charge of inspecting both Brazilian states and the federal government. Collected data was analyzed by using Anova and Chi-Squared test. Results indicate that the preference for linguistic styles guide the attention and interpretation of analyses carried out, which may interfere with the perception of reliability of the information being examined by government auditors, as well as with reaching professional judgment. This research contributes to the understanding of part of the judgment process, as well as of motivational factor effects acting on these professionals. It may also guide actions of risk mitigation in the case of relevant judgments.
id UFRGS-23_83eac124885a2bacaea864f39d0578da
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/31362
network_acronym_str UFRGS-23
network_name_str ConTexto
repository_id_str
spelling DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITINGA LINGUAGEM FAZ DIFERENÇA? UM EXAME EXPERIMENTAL SOBRE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY NO JULGAMENTO DO AUDITOR GOVERNAMENTAL BRASILEIROAuditoria governamentalJulgamento profissionalMotivated sensitivityGovernmental auditingProfessional judgmentMotivatedsensitivityThis study aimed at examining the occurrence of motivated sensitivity in the analyses of economical, financial and patrimonial information carried out by Brazilian government auditors, which results from the influence of linguistic preference in their processing. Methodology used was field experiment: two groups formed at random were exposed to the manipulation of the linguistic variable (textual and numerical). Subjects were government auditors from an agency in charge of inspecting both Brazilian states and the federal government. Collected data was analyzed by using Anova and Chi-Squared test. Results indicate that the preference for linguistic styles guide the attention and interpretation of analyses carried out, which may interfere with the perception of reliability of the information being examined by government auditors, as well as with reaching professional judgment. This research contributes to the understanding of part of the judgment process, as well as of motivational factor effects acting on these professionals. It may also guide actions of risk mitigation in the case of relevant judgments. Este estudo busca examinar a ocorrência de motivated sensitivity na análise de informações econômicas, financeiras e patrimoniais das entidades realizada pelo auditor governamental brasileiro em decorrência da influência da preferência linguística em seu processamento. A metodologia utilizada foi o experimento de campo com a exposição de dois grupos aleatoriamente constituídos de auditores governamentais, de órgãos de fiscalização interna e externa dos estados e do governo federal do Brasil à manipulação da variável linguística entre textual e numérica. Os dados coletados foram analisados com a utilização da Anova e do Qui-Quadrado. Os resultados indicam que a preferência por estilos linguísticos guia a atenção e a interpretação das análises realizadas, podendo interferir na percepção de confiabilidade das informações postas sob exame dos auditores governamentais e na formulação do julgamento profissional. A pesquisa contribui para o entendimento de parte do processo de julgamento e dos efeitos de fatores motivacionais desse grupo e pode guiar a adoção de ações de mitigação do risco para os casos de julgamentos relevantes.UFRGS2013-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 13 n. 23 (2013): jan./abr. 2013; 37-432175-87511676-6016reponame:ConTextoinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362/pdfSousa, Rossana Guerra dePaulo, EdilsonSilva, César Augusto Tibúrcioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-10-14T17:19:46Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/31362Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/indexPUBhttpw://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/oaifernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br2175-87511676-6016opendoar:2013-10-14T17:19:46ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
A LINGUAGEM FAZ DIFERENÇA? UM EXAME EXPERIMENTAL SOBRE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY NO JULGAMENTO DO AUDITOR GOVERNAMENTAL BRASILEIRO
title DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
spellingShingle DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
Sousa, Rossana Guerra de
Auditoria governamental
Julgamento profissional
Motivated sensitivity
Governmental auditing
Professional judgment
Motivatedsensitivity
title_short DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
title_full DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
title_fullStr DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
title_full_unstemmed DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
title_sort DOES LANGUAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAM ON THE MOTIVATED SENSITIVITY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF BRAZILIAN GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
author Sousa, Rossana Guerra de
author_facet Sousa, Rossana Guerra de
Paulo, Edilson
Silva, César Augusto Tibúrcio
author_role author
author2 Paulo, Edilson
Silva, César Augusto Tibúrcio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Rossana Guerra de
Paulo, Edilson
Silva, César Augusto Tibúrcio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Auditoria governamental
Julgamento profissional
Motivated sensitivity
Governmental auditing
Professional judgment
Motivatedsensitivity
topic Auditoria governamental
Julgamento profissional
Motivated sensitivity
Governmental auditing
Professional judgment
Motivatedsensitivity
description This study aimed at examining the occurrence of motivated sensitivity in the analyses of economical, financial and patrimonial information carried out by Brazilian government auditors, which results from the influence of linguistic preference in their processing. Methodology used was field experiment: two groups formed at random were exposed to the manipulation of the linguistic variable (textual and numerical). Subjects were government auditors from an agency in charge of inspecting both Brazilian states and the federal government. Collected data was analyzed by using Anova and Chi-Squared test. Results indicate that the preference for linguistic styles guide the attention and interpretation of analyses carried out, which may interfere with the perception of reliability of the information being examined by government auditors, as well as with reaching professional judgment. This research contributes to the understanding of part of the judgment process, as well as of motivational factor effects acting on these professionals. It may also guide actions of risk mitigation in the case of relevant judgments.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/31362/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 13 n. 23 (2013): jan./abr. 2013; 37-43
2175-8751
1676-6016
reponame:ConTexto
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str ConTexto
collection ConTexto
repository.name.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766349415710720