BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oreiro, José Luís
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Análise Econômica (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/10732
Resumo: The objective of this article is to criticize neoclassical models of asset price bubbles and to argue that a general theory of asset price cycles demands the substitution of rational expectations hypothesis for bounded rationality assumption. In order to do that we will initially present the two neoclassical approaches for the problem of asset price bubbles. The first one, based on models of multiple equilibria with rational expectations, take financial markets as competitive and investors's behavior as based on perfect and complete information. In this setting, asset bubbles are a logically possible but unprobable phenomenon since their ocurrence will be associated with problems of dynamic ineficience which are not a relevant problem for most of capitalist economies. The second approach, initially developed by Krugman, take as a starting point the idea that financial market are far from perfect. In fact, these markets have a great number of imperfections as, for example, moral hazard. In this approach, asset price bubbles are the result of trading in assets with low supply-price elasticity as, for example, equities and land. Although this second approach is more realistic than the first, it is not capable to explain in a unified framework the appearance, propagation and burst of the speculative bubble; i.e the phenomenon of asset price cycles. This second approach is only capable to show the conditions for the existence of an asset bubble; but it is not capable to explain the dynamic evolution of the bubble. This question is better adressed by heterodox literature based on the hypothesis of bounded rationality.
id UFRGS-24_56e19fc1440cf1cf84fb8d48c6d07c27
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/10732
network_acronym_str UFRGS-24
network_name_str Análise Econômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVASBOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVASBubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.JEL ClassificationD84E44Gl2G14Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.JEL ClassificationD84E44Gl2G14The objective of this article is to criticize neoclassical models of asset price bubbles and to argue that a general theory of asset price cycles demands the substitution of rational expectations hypothesis for bounded rationality assumption. In order to do that we will initially present the two neoclassical approaches for the problem of asset price bubbles. The first one, based on models of multiple equilibria with rational expectations, take financial markets as competitive and investors's behavior as based on perfect and complete information. In this setting, asset bubbles are a logically possible but unprobable phenomenon since their ocurrence will be associated with problems of dynamic ineficience which are not a relevant problem for most of capitalist economies. The second approach, initially developed by Krugman, take as a starting point the idea that financial market are far from perfect. In fact, these markets have a great number of imperfections as, for example, moral hazard. In this approach, asset price bubbles are the result of trading in assets with low supply-price elasticity as, for example, equities and land. Although this second approach is more realistic than the first, it is not capable to explain in a unified framework the appearance, propagation and burst of the speculative bubble; i.e the phenomenon of asset price cycles. This second approach is only capable to show the conditions for the existence of an asset bubble; but it is not capable to explain the dynamic evolution of the bubble. This question is better adressed by heterodox literature based on the hypothesis of bounded rationality.The objective of this article is to criticize neoclassical models of asset price bubbles and to argue that a general theory of asset price cycles demands the substitution of rational expectations hypothesis for bounded rationality assumption. In order to do that we will initially present the two neoclassical approaches for the problem of asset price bubbles. The first one, based on models of multiple equilibria with rational expectations, take financial markets as competitive and investors's behavior as based on perfect and complete information. In this setting, asset bubbles are a logically possible but unprobable phenomenon since their ocurrence will be associated with problems of dynamic ineficience which are not a relevant problem for most of capitalist economies. The second approach, initially developed by Krugman, take as a starting point the idea that financial market are far from perfect. In fact, these markets have a great number of imperfections as, for example, moral hazard. In this approach, asset price bubbles are the result of trading in assets with low supply-price elasticity as, for example, equities and land. Although this second approach is more realistic than the first, it is not capable to explain in a unified framework the appearance, propagation and burst of the speculative bubble; i.e the phenomenon of asset price cycles. This second approach is only capable to show the conditions for the existence of an asset bubble; but it is not capable to explain the dynamic evolution of the bubble. This question is better adressed by heterodox literature based on the hypothesis of bounded rationality.UFRGS2009-10-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/1073210.22456/2176-5456.10732Análise Econômica; Vol. 21 No. 40 (2003): setembro de 2003Análise Econômica; v. 21 n. 40 (2003): setembro de 20032176-54560102-9924reponame:Análise Econômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/10732/6343Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOreiro, José Luís2019-08-29T12:41:01Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/10732Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomicaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/oai||rae@ufrgs.br2176-54560102-9924opendoar:2019-08-29T12:41:01Análise Econômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
title BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
spellingShingle BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
Oreiro, José Luís
Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
title_short BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
title_full BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
title_fullStr BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
title_full_unstemmed BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
title_sort BOLHAS RACIONAIS, CICLO DE PREÇOS DE ATIVOS E RACIONALIDADE LIMITADA: UMA AVALIAÇÃO CRÍTICA DOS MODELOS NEOCLÁSSICOS DE BOLHAS ESPECULATIVAS
author Oreiro, José Luís
author_facet Oreiro, José Luís
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oreiro, José Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
topic Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
Bubbles. Financial Markets. Rafionality.
JEL Classification
D84
E44
Gl2
G14
description The objective of this article is to criticize neoclassical models of asset price bubbles and to argue that a general theory of asset price cycles demands the substitution of rational expectations hypothesis for bounded rationality assumption. In order to do that we will initially present the two neoclassical approaches for the problem of asset price bubbles. The first one, based on models of multiple equilibria with rational expectations, take financial markets as competitive and investors's behavior as based on perfect and complete information. In this setting, asset bubbles are a logically possible but unprobable phenomenon since their ocurrence will be associated with problems of dynamic ineficience which are not a relevant problem for most of capitalist economies. The second approach, initially developed by Krugman, take as a starting point the idea that financial market are far from perfect. In fact, these markets have a great number of imperfections as, for example, moral hazard. In this approach, asset price bubbles are the result of trading in assets with low supply-price elasticity as, for example, equities and land. Although this second approach is more realistic than the first, it is not capable to explain in a unified framework the appearance, propagation and burst of the speculative bubble; i.e the phenomenon of asset price cycles. This second approach is only capable to show the conditions for the existence of an asset bubble; but it is not capable to explain the dynamic evolution of the bubble. This question is better adressed by heterodox literature based on the hypothesis of bounded rationality.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-10-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/10732
10.22456/2176-5456.10732
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/10732
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/2176-5456.10732
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/10732/6343
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Econômica; Vol. 21 No. 40 (2003): setembro de 2003
Análise Econômica; v. 21 n. 40 (2003): setembro de 2003
2176-5456
0102-9924
reponame:Análise Econômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Análise Econômica (Online)
collection Análise Econômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Análise Econômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rae@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766266154582016