Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Debates |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/76214 |
Resumo: | In the last few years street demonstrations broke out in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries to protest against major corruption scandals. Various scholars studying the case of Brazil have argued that the economic recession was one of the conditions triggering public’s reaction against corruption scandals (MELO, 2016; HAGOPIAN, 2016), as public opinion might tolerate corruption during times of economic boom – when government social programs can be expanded – but they are less likely to accept it during times of economic recession (BALAN, 2014). This article uses data from the LAPOP surveys 2010 to show that there is a systematic link between corruption – perception and victimization – and participation in protests, even in times of economic growth. Two possible mechanisms are discussed. Results suggest that the link between corruption and protests is not conditional to the economic cycle. |
id |
UFRGS-26_5e95415ac0aebcd224039eb3065a7f78 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/76214 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Debates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin AmericaCorrupción, accountability y participación civil en protestas en América LatinaCorrupção, accountability e participação civil em protestos na América LatinaCorruptionProtestsParticipationAccountability.CorrupçãoParticipaçãoProtestosAccountability.CorrupciónParticipaciónProtestasAccountability.In the last few years street demonstrations broke out in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries to protest against major corruption scandals. Various scholars studying the case of Brazil have argued that the economic recession was one of the conditions triggering public’s reaction against corruption scandals (MELO, 2016; HAGOPIAN, 2016), as public opinion might tolerate corruption during times of economic boom – when government social programs can be expanded – but they are less likely to accept it during times of economic recession (BALAN, 2014). This article uses data from the LAPOP surveys 2010 to show that there is a systematic link between corruption – perception and victimization – and participation in protests, even in times of economic growth. Two possible mechanisms are discussed. Results suggest that the link between corruption and protests is not conditional to the economic cycle.En los últimos años, manifestaciones callejeras ocurrieron en Brasil y en otros países latinoamericanos para protestar contra los grandes escándalos de corrupción. En el caso de Brasil, la mayoría de los encuestados de la Comisión de Asuntos Económicos y Monetarios de la Unión Europea (UE), en el marco de la reforma agraria, el boom económico - cuando los programas sociales del gobierno se pueden expandir - pero son menos propensos a aceptarla en tiempos de recesión económica (BALAN, 2014). Este artículo utiliza datos de la encuesta LAPOP 2010 para mostrar que existe una relación sistemática entre corrupción - percepción y victimización - y participación en protestas, incluso en tiempos de crecimiento económico, en el que se discute dos posibles mecanismos. Los resultados sugieren que el vínculo entre corrupción y participación en protestas no está condicionado por el ciclo económico.Nos últimos anos, manifestações de rua ocorreram no Brasil e em outros países latino-americanos para protestar contra os grandes escândalos de corrupção. Vários pesquisadores que estudam o caso do Brasil argumentaram que a recessão econômica foi uma das condições que desencadearam a reação do público contra os escândalos de corrupção (MELO, 2016; HAGOPIAN, 2016), considerando que a opinião pública pode tolerar a corrupção em tempos de boom econômico – quando os programas sociais do governo podem ser expandidos – mas são menos propensos a aceitá-la em tempos de recessão econômica (BALAN, 2014). Este artigo utiliza dados da pesquisa LAPOP 2010 para mostrar que existe uma relação sistemática entre corrupção – percepção e vitimização – e participação em protestos, mesmo em tempos de crescimento econômico, no qual são discutidos dois possíveis mecanismos. Os resultados sugerem que o vínculo entre corrupção e participação em protestos não está condicionado pelo ciclo econômico.UFRGS2017-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/7621410.22456/1982-5269.76214Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 11-28Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 11-281982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/76214/45746Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvenburg, Alejandro2017-12-20T13:46:03Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/76214Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2017-12-20T13:46:03Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America Corrupción, accountability y participación civil en protestas en América Latina Corrupção, accountability e participação civil em protestos na América Latina |
title |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
spellingShingle |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America Avenburg, Alejandro Corruption Protests Participation Accountability. Corrupção Participação Protestos Accountability. Corrupción Participación Protestas Accountability. |
title_short |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
title_full |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
title_fullStr |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
title_sort |
Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America |
author |
Avenburg, Alejandro |
author_facet |
Avenburg, Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Avenburg, Alejandro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corruption Protests Participation Accountability. Corrupção Participação Protestos Accountability. Corrupción Participación Protestas Accountability. |
topic |
Corruption Protests Participation Accountability. Corrupção Participação Protestos Accountability. Corrupción Participación Protestas Accountability. |
description |
In the last few years street demonstrations broke out in Brazil as well as in other Latin American countries to protest against major corruption scandals. Various scholars studying the case of Brazil have argued that the economic recession was one of the conditions triggering public’s reaction against corruption scandals (MELO, 2016; HAGOPIAN, 2016), as public opinion might tolerate corruption during times of economic boom – when government social programs can be expanded – but they are less likely to accept it during times of economic recession (BALAN, 2014). This article uses data from the LAPOP surveys 2010 to show that there is a systematic link between corruption – perception and victimization – and participation in protests, even in times of economic growth. Two possible mechanisms are discussed. Results suggest that the link between corruption and protests is not conditional to the economic cycle. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/76214 10.22456/1982-5269.76214 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/76214 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/1982-5269.76214 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/76214/45746 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 11-28 Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 11-28 1982-5269 2236-479X reponame:Revista Debates instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Revista Debates |
collection |
Revista Debates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845565560094720 |