Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucas, Eduardo Terra
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Koff, Walter Jose, Rosito, Tiago Elias, Berger, Milton, Bortolini, Tiago, Silva Neto, Brasil
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103
Resumo: Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures.
id UFRGS-2_038e03a3fd214ace383fbdbce1f81357
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/182103
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Lucas, Eduardo TerraKoff, Walter JoseRosito, Tiago EliasBerger, MiltonBortolini, TiagoSilva Neto, Brasil2018-09-18T02:30:06Z20171677-5538http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103001072286Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures.application/pdfengInternational brazilian journal of urology. Vol. 43, no.2 (Mar./Apr. 2017), p. 304-310Análise custo-benefícioMedidas de resultados relatados pelo pacientePeríodo pós-operatórioQualidade de vidaProcedimentos de cirurgia plásticaResultado do tratamentoEstreitamento uretralMicçãoUrethral StrictureSurveys and QuestionnairesQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisAssessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001072286.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf601184http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/1/001072286.pdf557fe256e4b6b94fae75d8c6521176c9MD51TEXT001072286.pdf.txt001072286.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain25270http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/2/001072286.pdf.txte00c59f274a0bf2a2deef7fe8bbe3caaMD52THUMBNAIL001072286.pdf.jpg001072286.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1915http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/3/001072286.pdf.jpg51eb160c4f46140fe37eb48197d05701MD5310183/1821032023-11-19 04:21:01.706927oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/182103Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:01Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
title Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
spellingShingle Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
Lucas, Eduardo Terra
Análise custo-benefício
Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente
Período pós-operatório
Qualidade de vida
Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica
Resultado do tratamento
Estreitamento uretral
Micção
Urethral Stricture
Surveys and Questionnaires
Quality of Life
Cost-Benefit Analysis
title_short Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
title_full Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
title_fullStr Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
title_sort Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
author Lucas, Eduardo Terra
author_facet Lucas, Eduardo Terra
Koff, Walter Jose
Rosito, Tiago Elias
Berger, Milton
Bortolini, Tiago
Silva Neto, Brasil
author_role author
author2 Koff, Walter Jose
Rosito, Tiago Elias
Berger, Milton
Bortolini, Tiago
Silva Neto, Brasil
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucas, Eduardo Terra
Koff, Walter Jose
Rosito, Tiago Elias
Berger, Milton
Bortolini, Tiago
Silva Neto, Brasil
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Análise custo-benefício
Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente
Período pós-operatório
Qualidade de vida
Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica
Resultado do tratamento
Estreitamento uretral
Micção
topic Análise custo-benefício
Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente
Período pós-operatório
Qualidade de vida
Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica
Resultado do tratamento
Estreitamento uretral
Micção
Urethral Stricture
Surveys and Questionnaires
Quality of Life
Cost-Benefit Analysis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Urethral Stricture
Surveys and Questionnaires
Quality of Life
Cost-Benefit Analysis
description Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-09-18T02:30:06Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1677-5538
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001072286
identifier_str_mv 1677-5538
001072286
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv International brazilian journal of urology. Vol. 43, no.2 (Mar./Apr. 2017), p. 304-310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/1/001072286.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/2/001072286.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/3/001072286.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 557fe256e4b6b94fae75d8c6521176c9
e00c59f274a0bf2a2deef7fe8bbe3caa
51eb160c4f46140fe37eb48197d05701
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224950433972224