Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103 |
Resumo: | Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures. |
id |
UFRGS-2_038e03a3fd214ace383fbdbce1f81357 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/182103 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lucas, Eduardo TerraKoff, Walter JoseRosito, Tiago EliasBerger, MiltonBortolini, TiagoSilva Neto, Brasil2018-09-18T02:30:06Z20171677-5538http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103001072286Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures.application/pdfengInternational brazilian journal of urology. Vol. 43, no.2 (Mar./Apr. 2017), p. 304-310Análise custo-benefícioMedidas de resultados relatados pelo pacientePeríodo pós-operatórioQualidade de vidaProcedimentos de cirurgia plásticaResultado do tratamentoEstreitamento uretralMicçãoUrethral StrictureSurveys and QuestionnairesQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisAssessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001072286.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf601184http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/1/001072286.pdf557fe256e4b6b94fae75d8c6521176c9MD51TEXT001072286.pdf.txt001072286.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain25270http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/2/001072286.pdf.txte00c59f274a0bf2a2deef7fe8bbe3caaMD52THUMBNAIL001072286.pdf.jpg001072286.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1915http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/3/001072286.pdf.jpg51eb160c4f46140fe37eb48197d05701MD5310183/1821032023-11-19 04:21:01.706927oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/182103Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:01Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
title |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis Lucas, Eduardo Terra Análise custo-benefício Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente Período pós-operatório Qualidade de vida Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica Resultado do tratamento Estreitamento uretral Micção Urethral Stricture Surveys and Questionnaires Quality of Life Cost-Benefit Analysis |
title_short |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
title_full |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
title_sort |
Assessment of satisfaction and Quality of Life using self - reported questionnaires after urethroplasty : a prospective analysis |
author |
Lucas, Eduardo Terra |
author_facet |
Lucas, Eduardo Terra Koff, Walter Jose Rosito, Tiago Elias Berger, Milton Bortolini, Tiago Silva Neto, Brasil |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Koff, Walter Jose Rosito, Tiago Elias Berger, Milton Bortolini, Tiago Silva Neto, Brasil |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lucas, Eduardo Terra Koff, Walter Jose Rosito, Tiago Elias Berger, Milton Bortolini, Tiago Silva Neto, Brasil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise custo-benefício Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente Período pós-operatório Qualidade de vida Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica Resultado do tratamento Estreitamento uretral Micção |
topic |
Análise custo-benefício Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente Período pós-operatório Qualidade de vida Procedimentos de cirurgia plástica Resultado do tratamento Estreitamento uretral Micção Urethral Stricture Surveys and Questionnaires Quality of Life Cost-Benefit Analysis |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Urethral Stricture Surveys and Questionnaires Quality of Life Cost-Benefit Analysis |
description |
Objectives: To assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after urethroplasty using two different self-reported outcome measures and to compare it with objective clinical data. Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data from 35 consecutive patients who underwent urethroplasty from January 2013 to September 2014. Patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score, urethral stricture surgery patient-reported outcome measure (USS-PROM), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine were collected before, two and eight months after surgery. Failure occurred when any postoperative instrumentation was performed. General estimation equation was used to compare the results and linear regression analysis to correlate both questionnaires with objective data. Results: Mean age was 61 years. Urethroplasties were equally divided between anastomotic and buccal mucosa grafts and 19 patients (59.3%) had a previous urethral procedure. Overall success rate was 87.5%. IPSS improved from a mean 19 at baseline to 5.32 at 8 months (p <0.001). The mean USS-PROM score also improved from 13.21 preoperatively to 3.36 after surgery (p <0.001) and 84.3% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgical results. Mean Qmax increased from 4.64mL/s to 11mL/s (p <0.001). Strong negative correlation was found respectively between flow rate and USS-PROM (r=-0.531, p <0.001) and with IPSS (r=-0.512, p <0.001). Conclusions: Significant improvements in urinary symptoms and in quality of life are expected after urethroplasty and they are correlated with objective measures. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-18T02:30:06Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1677-5538 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001072286 |
identifier_str_mv |
1677-5538 001072286 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/182103 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
International brazilian journal of urology. Vol. 43, no.2 (Mar./Apr. 2017), p. 304-310 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/1/001072286.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/2/001072286.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/182103/3/001072286.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
557fe256e4b6b94fae75d8c6521176c9 e00c59f274a0bf2a2deef7fe8bbe3caa 51eb160c4f46140fe37eb48197d05701 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224950433972224 |