Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/37824 |
Resumo: | We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/mL and MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 μg/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/mL and MIC90, 2 μg/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers. |
id |
UFRGS-2_0f3195f2461b31b498684306727496b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/37824 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gales, Ana CristinaSader, Hélio S.Ribeiro, Julival FagundesZoccoli, CássiaBarth, Afonso LuisPignatari, Antonio C.2012-03-23T01:20:57Z20091413-8670http://hdl.handle.net/10183/37824000774712We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/mL and MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 μg/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/mL and MIC90, 2 μg/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.application/pdfengThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases. Vol. 13, n. 2 (Apr. 2009), p. 90-98Bacterias gram-positivasHospitaisSuscetibilidade a doençasFarmáciaAntimicrobial resistanceSENTRYNosocomial infectionsBrazilAntimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000774712.pdf000774712.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf106861http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/1/000774712.pdf0d90a671523950a006db5d40e0838832MD51TEXT000774712.pdf.txt000774712.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain36953http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/2/000774712.pdf.txta25bdf24b0c3041ae8b0eff00c70de46MD52THUMBNAIL000774712.pdf.jpg000774712.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1872http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/3/000774712.pdf.jpg8bd84afec78b3eee8b5983df5f1e6f4cMD5310183/378242023-06-15 03:26:31.945379oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/37824Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-06-15T06:26:31Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) Gales, Ana Cristina Bacterias gram-positivas Hospitais Suscetibilidade a doenças Farmácia Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY Nosocomial infections Brazil |
title_short |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_full |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in Brazilian Hospitals Participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
author |
Gales, Ana Cristina |
author_facet |
Gales, Ana Cristina Sader, Hélio S. Ribeiro, Julival Fagundes Zoccoli, Cássia Barth, Afonso Luis Pignatari, Antonio C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sader, Hélio S. Ribeiro, Julival Fagundes Zoccoli, Cássia Barth, Afonso Luis Pignatari, Antonio C. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gales, Ana Cristina Sader, Hélio S. Ribeiro, Julival Fagundes Zoccoli, Cássia Barth, Afonso Luis Pignatari, Antonio C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bacterias gram-positivas Hospitais Suscetibilidade a doenças Farmácia |
topic |
Bacterias gram-positivas Hospitais Suscetibilidade a doenças Farmácia Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY Nosocomial infections Brazil |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY Nosocomial infections Brazil |
description |
We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 μg/mL and MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 μg/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 μg/mL and MIC90, 2 μg/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-23T01:20:57Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/37824 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1413-8670 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000774712 |
identifier_str_mv |
1413-8670 000774712 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/37824 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases. Vol. 13, n. 2 (Apr. 2009), p. 90-98 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/1/000774712.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/2/000774712.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/37824/3/000774712.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
0d90a671523950a006db5d40e0838832 a25bdf24b0c3041ae8b0eff00c70de46 8bd84afec78b3eee8b5983df5f1e6f4c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447448766644224 |