Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
Texto Completo: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977 |
Resumo: | We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers. |
id |
UFSP_69f91db116d14f04de1d33d2f305ad2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4977 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository_id_str |
3465 |
spelling |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)Antimicrobial resistanceSENTRYnosocomial infectionsBrazilWe report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)JMI LaboratoriesHospital de Base do Distrito FederalLaboratório Médico Santa LuziaHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUNIFESPSciELOBrazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)JMI LaboratoriesHospital de Base do Distrito FederalLaboratório Médico Santa LuziaHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreGales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP]Ribeiro, JulivalZoccoli, CassiaBarth, AfonsoPignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:39:10Z2015-06-14T13:39:10Z2009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion90-98application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009.10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004S1413-86702009000200004.pdf1413-8670S1413-86702009000200004http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977WOS:000270597100004engBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T05:38:17Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4977Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T05:38:17Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
spellingShingle |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP] Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY nosocomial infections Brazil |
title_short |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_full |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_fullStr |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
title_sort |
Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008) |
author |
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP] |
author_facet |
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP] Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP] Ribeiro, Julival Zoccoli, Cassia Barth, Afonso Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP] Ribeiro, Julival Zoccoli, Cassia Barth, Afonso Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) JMI Laboratories Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal Laboratório Médico Santa Luzia Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP] Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP] Ribeiro, Julival Zoccoli, Cassia Barth, Afonso Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY nosocomial infections Brazil |
topic |
Antimicrobial resistance SENTRY nosocomial infections Brazil |
description |
We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-01 2015-06-14T13:39:10Z 2015-06-14T13:39:10Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004 Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009. 10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004 S1413-86702009000200004.pdf 1413-8670 S1413-86702009000200004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977 WOS:000270597100004 |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004 http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009. 10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004 S1413-86702009000200004.pdf 1413-8670 S1413-86702009000200004 WOS:000270597100004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
90-98 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) instacron:UNIFESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
instacron_str |
UNIFESP |
institution |
UNIFESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br |
_version_ |
1814268392873394176 |