Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP], Ribeiro, Julival, Zoccoli, Cassia, Barth, Afonso, Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977
Resumo: We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.
id UFSP_69f91db116d14f04de1d33d2f305ad2c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4977
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)Antimicrobial resistanceSENTRYnosocomial infectionsBrazilWe report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)JMI LaboratoriesHospital de Base do Distrito FederalLaboratório Médico Santa LuziaHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUNIFESPSciELOBrazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)JMI LaboratoriesHospital de Base do Distrito FederalLaboratório Médico Santa LuziaHospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreGales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP]Ribeiro, JulivalZoccoli, CassiaBarth, AfonsoPignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:39:10Z2015-06-14T13:39:10Z2009-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion90-98application/pdfhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009.10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004S1413-86702009000200004.pdf1413-8670S1413-86702009000200004http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977WOS:000270597100004engBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseasesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T05:38:17Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/4977Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-06T05:38:17Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
title Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
spellingShingle Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
Antimicrobial resistance
SENTRY
nosocomial infections
Brazil
title_short Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
title_full Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
title_fullStr Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
title_sort Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated in brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program (2005-2008)
author Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
author_facet Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP]
Ribeiro, Julival
Zoccoli, Cassia
Barth, Afonso
Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP]
Ribeiro, Julival
Zoccoli, Cassia
Barth, Afonso
Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
JMI Laboratories
Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
Laboratório Médico Santa Luzia
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gales, Ana Cristina [UNIFESP]
Sader, Helio Silva [UNIFESP]
Ribeiro, Julival
Zoccoli, Cassia
Barth, Afonso
Pignatari, Antonio Carlos Campos [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial resistance
SENTRY
nosocomial infections
Brazil
topic Antimicrobial resistance
SENTRY
nosocomial infections
Brazil
description We report the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria in the Brazilian hospitals participating in the SENTRYAntimicrobial Surveillance Program. The strains were consecutively collected (one per patient) between January 2005 and September 2008 and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution methods at the JMI Laboratories (North Liberty, Iowa, USA). A total of 3,907 Gram-positive cocci were analyzed. The Gram-positive organisms most frequently isolated from bloodstream infections were Staphylococcus aureus (2,218 strains; 20.2% of total), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 812 strains [14.7%]), and Enterococcus spp. (754 strains; 5.0%). S. aureus ranked first (28.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis ranked 7th (4.5%) among cases of skin and soft tissue infections. S. aureus was also the second most frequently isolated pathogen from patients with lower respiratory tract infections (24.9% of cases) after Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.5%). Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 31.0% of S. aureus and the vast majority of oxacillin-resistant (MRSA) strains were also resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin were all very active against S. aureus strains tested (>99.9-100.0% susceptible), but daptomycin (MIC50, 0.25 g/mL and MIC90, 0.5 g/mL) was four- to eight-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 g/mL) and linezolid (MIC50, 1 g/mL and MIC90, 2 g/mL). Vancomycin resistance increased significantly among enterococci during the study period, but it was restrict to only one medical center until 2007 and emerged in a second medical center in 2008. Daptomycin was the most active antimicrobial tested against enterococci in general (100.0% susceptible), followed by linezolid (99.9% susceptible), ampicillin (87.4%) and vancomycin (84.6%). In conclusion, daptomycin and linezolid showed excellent in vitro activity against contemporary Gram-positive organisms (3,907) collected in Brazilian hospitals monitored by the SENTRY Program, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and other multidrugresistant organisms. Although vancomycin resistance rates in Brazil appears to be relatively low compared to those reported in the USA, VRE has emerged and rapidly disseminated in some Brazilian medical centers.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-01
2015-06-14T13:39:10Z
2015-06-14T13:39:10Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009.
10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004
S1413-86702009000200004.pdf
1413-8670
S1413-86702009000200004
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977
WOS:000270597100004
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702009000200004
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/4977
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, v. 13, n. 2, p. 90-98, 2009.
10.1590/S1413-86702009000200004
S1413-86702009000200004.pdf
1413-8670
S1413-86702009000200004
WOS:000270597100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 90-98
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1814268392873394176