Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Timotheo, Carina Alves
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer, Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia, Silva, Patrícia Valente da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891
Resumo: The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants.
id UFRGS-2_1689a2195dc5bf4e38873c8f3ce090e6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270891
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Timotheo, Carina AlvesFabricio, Mariana FensterseiferAyub, Marco Antônio ZáchiaSilva, Patrícia Valente da2024-01-12T03:28:31Z20230001-3765http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891001193368The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants.application/pdfengAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Vol. 95 (2023), e20191256,8 p.LeveduraÓleo microbianoYarrowiaLipídioBiologia celularCell disruptionLipid extractionMicrobial oilOleaginous yeastEvaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extractioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001193368.pdf.txt001193368.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain28066http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/2/001193368.pdf.txt5ca78298d99e67c50a87a5047f360f25MD52ORIGINAL001193368.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf299275http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/1/001193368.pdf33f3c8be3f1dca46f0e49466355d5e69MD5110183/2708912024-01-13 04:41:09.181873oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270891Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-01-13T06:41:09Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
title Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
spellingShingle Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
Timotheo, Carina Alves
Levedura
Óleo microbiano
Yarrowia
Lipídio
Biologia celular
Cell disruption
Lipid extraction
Microbial oil
Oleaginous yeast
title_short Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
title_full Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
title_fullStr Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
title_sort Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
author Timotheo, Carina Alves
author_facet Timotheo, Carina Alves
Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer
Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia
Silva, Patrícia Valente da
author_role author
author2 Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer
Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia
Silva, Patrícia Valente da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Timotheo, Carina Alves
Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer
Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia
Silva, Patrícia Valente da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Levedura
Óleo microbiano
Yarrowia
Lipídio
Biologia celular
topic Levedura
Óleo microbiano
Yarrowia
Lipídio
Biologia celular
Cell disruption
Lipid extraction
Microbial oil
Oleaginous yeast
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Cell disruption
Lipid extraction
Microbial oil
Oleaginous yeast
description The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-01-12T03:28:31Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0001-3765
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001193368
identifier_str_mv 0001-3765
001193368
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Vol. 95 (2023), e20191256,8 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/2/001193368.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/1/001193368.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5ca78298d99e67c50a87a5047f360f25
33f3c8be3f1dca46f0e49466355d5e69
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225109036335104