Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891 |
Resumo: | The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants. |
id |
UFRGS-2_1689a2195dc5bf4e38873c8f3ce090e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270891 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Timotheo, Carina AlvesFabricio, Mariana FensterseiferAyub, Marco Antônio ZáchiaSilva, Patrícia Valente da2024-01-12T03:28:31Z20230001-3765http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891001193368The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants.application/pdfengAnais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Vol. 95 (2023), e20191256, 8 p.LeveduraÓleo microbianoYarrowiaLipídioBiologia celularCell disruptionLipid extractionMicrobial oilOleaginous yeastEvaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extractioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001193368.pdf.txt001193368.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain28066http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/2/001193368.pdf.txt5ca78298d99e67c50a87a5047f360f25MD52ORIGINAL001193368.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf299275http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/1/001193368.pdf33f3c8be3f1dca46f0e49466355d5e69MD5110183/2708912024-10-03 06:53:48.171991oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270891Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-10-03T09:53:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
title |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction Timotheo, Carina Alves Levedura Óleo microbiano Yarrowia Lipídio Biologia celular Cell disruption Lipid extraction Microbial oil Oleaginous yeast |
title_short |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
title_full |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
title_sort |
Evaluation of cell disruption methods in the oleaginous yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A for microbial oil extraction |
author |
Timotheo, Carina Alves |
author_facet |
Timotheo, Carina Alves Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Silva, Patrícia Valente da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Silva, Patrícia Valente da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Timotheo, Carina Alves Fabricio, Mariana Fensterseifer Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Silva, Patrícia Valente da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Levedura Óleo microbiano Yarrowia Lipídio Biologia celular |
topic |
Levedura Óleo microbiano Yarrowia Lipídio Biologia celular Cell disruption Lipid extraction Microbial oil Oleaginous yeast |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Cell disruption Lipid extraction Microbial oil Oleaginous yeast |
description |
The interest for oleaginous yeasts has grown significantly in the last three decades, mainly due to their potential use as a renewable source of microbial oil or single cell oils (SCOs). However, the methodologies for cell disruption to obtain the microbial oil are considered critical and determinant for a large-scale production. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate different methods for cell wall disruption for the lipid extraction of Yarrowia lipolytica QU21 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii BI281A. The two strains were separately cultivated in 5 L batch fermenters for 120 hours, at 26 ºC and 400 rpm. Three different lipid extraction processes using Turrax homogenizer, Ultrasonicator and Braun homogenizer combined with bead milling were applied in wet, oven-dried, and freeze-dried biomass of both strains. The treatment with the highest percentage of disrupted cells and highest oil yield was the ultrasonication of oven-dried biomass (37-40% lipid content for both strains). The fact that our results point to one best extraction strategy for two different yeast strains, belonging to different species, is a great news towards the development of a unified technique that could be applied at industrial plants. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-12T03:28:31Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0001-3765 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001193368 |
identifier_str_mv |
0001-3765 001193368 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270891 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Vol. 95 (2023), e20191256, 8 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/2/001193368.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270891/1/001193368.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5ca78298d99e67c50a87a5047f360f25 33f3c8be3f1dca46f0e49466355d5e69 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447850475061248 |