Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102 |
Resumo: | Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth. |
id |
UFRGS-2_282145aa0c06d1e73fd797af147b39ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217102 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cavalheiro, Cleber ParadzinskiSouza, Pablo Soares deRocha, Rachel de OliveiraMendes, Fausto MedeirosBraga, Mariana MinatelRaggio, Daniela PrócidaLenzi, Tathiane Larissa2021-01-07T04:16:50Z20201519-0501http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102001115169Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth.application/pdfengPesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 20, (2020), p. 1-8 , e5088Tomada de decisão clínicaFalha de restauração dentáriaDente decíduoClinical Decision-Making Dental Restoration FailureTooth, DeciduousChoosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decisioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001115169.pdf.txt001115169.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain24832http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/2/001115169.pdf.txt5c619fe39342accb79b7b92cac8530a1MD52ORIGINAL001115169.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf404019http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/1/001115169.pdf109fb56686f9a4167d585aa71f1f398eMD5110183/2171022021-03-09 04:36:04.687558oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217102Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:36:04Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
title |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
spellingShingle |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Tomada de decisão clínica Falha de restauração dentária Dente decíduo Clinical Decision-Making Dental Restoration Failure Tooth, Deciduous |
title_short |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
title_full |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
title_fullStr |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
title_sort |
Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision |
author |
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski |
author_facet |
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Souza, Pablo Soares de Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Prócida Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Pablo Soares de Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Prócida Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Souza, Pablo Soares de Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira Mendes, Fausto Medeiros Braga, Mariana Minatel Raggio, Daniela Prócida Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tomada de decisão clínica Falha de restauração dentária Dente decíduo |
topic |
Tomada de decisão clínica Falha de restauração dentária Dente decíduo Clinical Decision-Making Dental Restoration Failure Tooth, Deciduous |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Decision-Making Dental Restoration Failure Tooth, Deciduous |
description |
Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-07T04:16:50Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1519-0501 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001115169 |
identifier_str_mv |
1519-0501 001115169 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 20, (2020), p. 1-8 , e5088 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/2/001115169.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/1/001115169.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5c619fe39342accb79b7b92cac8530a1 109fb56686f9a4167d585aa71f1f398e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447729506091008 |