Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Souza, Pablo Soares de, Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira, Mendes, Fausto Medeiros, Braga, Mariana Minatel, Raggio, Daniela Prócida, Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102
Resumo: Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth.
id UFRGS-2_282145aa0c06d1e73fd797af147b39ed
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217102
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Cavalheiro, Cleber ParadzinskiSouza, Pablo Soares deRocha, Rachel de OliveiraMendes, Fausto MedeirosBraga, Mariana MinatelRaggio, Daniela PrócidaLenzi, Tathiane Larissa2021-01-07T04:16:50Z20201519-0501http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102001115169Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth.application/pdfengPesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 20, (2020), p. 1-8 , e5088Tomada de decisão clínicaFalha de restauração dentáriaDente decíduoClinical Decision-Making Dental Restoration FailureTooth, DeciduousChoosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decisioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001115169.pdf.txt001115169.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain24832http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/2/001115169.pdf.txt5c619fe39342accb79b7b92cac8530a1MD52ORIGINAL001115169.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf404019http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/1/001115169.pdf109fb56686f9a4167d585aa71f1f398eMD5110183/2171022021-03-09 04:36:04.687558oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217102Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:36:04Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
title Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
spellingShingle Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
Tomada de decisão clínica
Falha de restauração dentária
Dente decíduo
Clinical Decision-Making 
Dental Restoration Failure
Tooth, Deciduous
title_short Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
title_full Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
title_fullStr Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
title_full_unstemmed Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
title_sort Choosing the criteria for clinical evaluation of composite restorations : an analysis of impact on reliabilty and treatment decision
author Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
author_facet Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
Souza, Pablo Soares de
Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
author_role author
author2 Souza, Pablo Soares de
Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski
Souza, Pablo Soares de
Rocha, Rachel de Oliveira
Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
Braga, Mariana Minatel
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tomada de decisão clínica
Falha de restauração dentária
Dente decíduo
topic Tomada de decisão clínica
Falha de restauração dentária
Dente decíduo
Clinical Decision-Making 
Dental Restoration Failure
Tooth, Deciduous
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Clinical Decision-Making 
Dental Restoration Failure
Tooth, Deciduous
description Objective: To assess the reproducibility of two clinical criteria for the evaluation of restorations in primary teeth and the impact on treatment decision. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed selecting 71 resin-based composite restorations placed in primary molars of children who had sought dental treatment at a dental school. Two trained examiners evaluated independently the restorations using modified FDI and USPHS criteria. All restorations were assessed separately with each system in random order to avoid memory bias. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter-examiner reliability considering each parameter of both criteria and score final about treatment decision. McNemar test was used to compare the treatment decision with two criteria. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: Kappa values ranged from 0.28 to 0.93 with USPHS and 0.28 to 0.88 with FDI, considering each parameter separately. Inter-examiner agreement for treatment decision was excellent for both criteria (Kappa: 0.85-0.90). For clinical decision-making, no difference between criteria was found, irrespective of examiner. Conclusion: Low inter-examiner agreement for evaluation of each parameter of USPHS and FDI criteria does not reflect on reproducibility for treatment decision. Both criteria may be suitable for evaluation of composite restorations in primary teeth.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-01-07T04:16:50Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1519-0501
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001115169
identifier_str_mv 1519-0501
001115169
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217102
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Pesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 20, (2020), p. 1-8 , e5088
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/2/001115169.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217102/1/001115169.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5c619fe39342accb79b7b92cac8530a1
109fb56686f9a4167d585aa71f1f398e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447729506091008