Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/213581 |
Resumo: | Although eggs are an excellent protein source, they are a perishable product. Many methods exist to extend shelf life of food and one of them is the use of protein coatings that may be combined with antimicrobial substances, as propolis. The effectiveness of rice protein coatings plus propolis on maintaining interior quality and eggshell breaking strength of fresh eggs was evaluated during storage at 20◦C for 6 wk. Egg quality was assessed by weight loss, Haugh unit (HU), albumen pH, yolk index (YI), shell strength, and scanning electron microscopy in uncoated eggs (control treatment) and eggs coated with rice protein concentrate and propolis at 5 or 10%. The HU and YI were higher in coated eggs (P < 0.001). Weight loss increased (P < 0.001) during long-term storage. Uncoated eggs showed the highest weight loss (5.39%), whereas rice protein (4.27%) and rice protein plus propolis at 5% (4.11%) and 10% (4.40%) solutions were effective in preventing weight lost (P < 0.001). Uncoated eggs had the worst (P < 0.001) HU (58.47), albumen pH (9.48), and YI (0.33) after 6 wk of storage. The eggs coated with rice protein and rice protein plus propolis presented results with similar intern quality between them during all the storage period. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated a lower surface porosity in coated eggshell, indicating that the use of the coating may provide a protective barrier against the transfer of gases and moisture. In conclusion rice protein and propolis treatments helped to maintain egg quality for a longer time compared to uncoated eggs. These could be a viable alternative for maintaining the internal quality of fresh eggs during long-term storage at room temperature. |
id |
UFRGS-2_42805afc1e5993f2e15235664513d390 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/213581 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pires, Paula Gabriela da SilvaPires, Patrícia Daniela da SilvaCardinal, Kátia MariaLeuven, Aline Fernanda RodriguesKindlein, LírisAndretta, Ines2020-09-17T04:02:53Z20190032-5791http://hdl.handle.net/10183/213581001116025Although eggs are an excellent protein source, they are a perishable product. Many methods exist to extend shelf life of food and one of them is the use of protein coatings that may be combined with antimicrobial substances, as propolis. The effectiveness of rice protein coatings plus propolis on maintaining interior quality and eggshell breaking strength of fresh eggs was evaluated during storage at 20◦C for 6 wk. Egg quality was assessed by weight loss, Haugh unit (HU), albumen pH, yolk index (YI), shell strength, and scanning electron microscopy in uncoated eggs (control treatment) and eggs coated with rice protein concentrate and propolis at 5 or 10%. The HU and YI were higher in coated eggs (P < 0.001). Weight loss increased (P < 0.001) during long-term storage. Uncoated eggs showed the highest weight loss (5.39%), whereas rice protein (4.27%) and rice protein plus propolis at 5% (4.11%) and 10% (4.40%) solutions were effective in preventing weight lost (P < 0.001). Uncoated eggs had the worst (P < 0.001) HU (58.47), albumen pH (9.48), and YI (0.33) after 6 wk of storage. The eggs coated with rice protein and rice protein plus propolis presented results with similar intern quality between them during all the storage period. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated a lower surface porosity in coated eggshell, indicating that the use of the coating may provide a protective barrier against the transfer of gases and moisture. In conclusion rice protein and propolis treatments helped to maintain egg quality for a longer time compared to uncoated eggs. These could be a viable alternative for maintaining the internal quality of fresh eggs during long-term storage at room temperature.application/pdfengPoultry science. Champaign. Vol. 98, no. 9 (Sept. 2019), p. 4196-4203RevestimentoCasca de ovoProteína de arrozPropolisQualidade dos alimentosVida de prateleiraEgg qualityEggshellNatural antimicrobialProtein coatingStorage timeEffects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001116025.pdf.txt001116025.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain40944http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/213581/2/001116025.pdf.txt01891247d88c8687cbef613ade6bc373MD52ORIGINAL001116025.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf671060http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/213581/1/001116025.pdf65eb5520124fc98b0b27ae76c6070e2aMD5110183/2135812020-09-18 04:02:35.811639oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/213581Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2020-09-18T07:02:35Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
title |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
spellingShingle |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva Revestimento Casca de ovo Proteína de arroz Propolis Qualidade dos alimentos Vida de prateleira Egg quality Eggshell Natural antimicrobial Protein coating Storage time |
title_short |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
title_full |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
title_fullStr |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
title_sort |
Effects of rice protein coatings combined or not with propolis on shelf life of eggs |
author |
Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva |
author_facet |
Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva Pires, Patrícia Daniela da Silva Cardinal, Kátia Maria Leuven, Aline Fernanda Rodrigues Kindlein, Líris Andretta, Ines |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pires, Patrícia Daniela da Silva Cardinal, Kátia Maria Leuven, Aline Fernanda Rodrigues Kindlein, Líris Andretta, Ines |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pires, Paula Gabriela da Silva Pires, Patrícia Daniela da Silva Cardinal, Kátia Maria Leuven, Aline Fernanda Rodrigues Kindlein, Líris Andretta, Ines |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Revestimento Casca de ovo Proteína de arroz Propolis Qualidade dos alimentos Vida de prateleira |
topic |
Revestimento Casca de ovo Proteína de arroz Propolis Qualidade dos alimentos Vida de prateleira Egg quality Eggshell Natural antimicrobial Protein coating Storage time |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Egg quality Eggshell Natural antimicrobial Protein coating Storage time |
description |
Although eggs are an excellent protein source, they are a perishable product. Many methods exist to extend shelf life of food and one of them is the use of protein coatings that may be combined with antimicrobial substances, as propolis. The effectiveness of rice protein coatings plus propolis on maintaining interior quality and eggshell breaking strength of fresh eggs was evaluated during storage at 20◦C for 6 wk. Egg quality was assessed by weight loss, Haugh unit (HU), albumen pH, yolk index (YI), shell strength, and scanning electron microscopy in uncoated eggs (control treatment) and eggs coated with rice protein concentrate and propolis at 5 or 10%. The HU and YI were higher in coated eggs (P < 0.001). Weight loss increased (P < 0.001) during long-term storage. Uncoated eggs showed the highest weight loss (5.39%), whereas rice protein (4.27%) and rice protein plus propolis at 5% (4.11%) and 10% (4.40%) solutions were effective in preventing weight lost (P < 0.001). Uncoated eggs had the worst (P < 0.001) HU (58.47), albumen pH (9.48), and YI (0.33) after 6 wk of storage. The eggs coated with rice protein and rice protein plus propolis presented results with similar intern quality between them during all the storage period. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated a lower surface porosity in coated eggshell, indicating that the use of the coating may provide a protective barrier against the transfer of gases and moisture. In conclusion rice protein and propolis treatments helped to maintain egg quality for a longer time compared to uncoated eggs. These could be a viable alternative for maintaining the internal quality of fresh eggs during long-term storage at room temperature. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-17T04:02:53Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/213581 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0032-5791 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001116025 |
identifier_str_mv |
0032-5791 001116025 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/213581 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Poultry science. Champaign. Vol. 98, no. 9 (Sept. 2019), p. 4196-4203 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/213581/2/001116025.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/213581/1/001116025.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
01891247d88c8687cbef613ade6bc373 65eb5520124fc98b0b27ae76c6070e2a |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224997565366272 |