Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Genro, Vanessa Krebs, Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos de, Cunha Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/247682
Resumo: Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). Results: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). Conclusion: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos.
id UFRGS-2_448dab6fd28c97b2a7c26dcb9f0d5ab5
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/247682
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Chapon, Rita de Cassia BorgesGenro, Vanessa KrebsSouza, Carlos Augusto Bastos deCunha Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue da2022-08-21T04:39:41Z20211518-0557http://hdl.handle.net/10183/247682001148065Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). Results: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). Conclusion: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos.application/pdfengJBRA assisted reproduction. Brasília. Vol. 24, no. 1 (2021), p. 131-135Fertilização in vitroHormônio foliculoestimulante humanoMenotropinasGonadotropinasEstruturas embrionáriasIn vitro fertilizationrFSHhMGGnRH antagonistEmbryonic qualityRandomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonistinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001148065.pdf.txt001148065.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain23491http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/247682/2/001148065.pdf.txt67422eb78937fd15194e333ecff974d3MD52ORIGINAL001148065.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf581112http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/247682/1/001148065.pdf72c3c987b843e01e8356d543c85d815aMD5110183/2476822022-08-22 04:35:17.199841oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/247682Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-08-22T07:35:17Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
spellingShingle Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Fertilização in vitro
Hormônio foliculoestimulante humano
Menotropinas
Gonadotropinas
Estruturas embrionárias
In vitro fertilization
rFSH
hMG
GnRH antagonist
Embryonic quality
title_short Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_full Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
title_sort Randomized controlled trial comparing embryonic quality in rFSH versus hMG in the IVF protocol with GnRH Antagonist
author Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
author_facet Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Genro, Vanessa Krebs
Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos de
Cunha Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue da
author_role author
author2 Genro, Vanessa Krebs
Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos de
Cunha Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chapon, Rita de Cassia Borges
Genro, Vanessa Krebs
Souza, Carlos Augusto Bastos de
Cunha Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fertilização in vitro
Hormônio foliculoestimulante humano
Menotropinas
Gonadotropinas
Estruturas embrionárias
topic Fertilização in vitro
Hormônio foliculoestimulante humano
Menotropinas
Gonadotropinas
Estruturas embrionárias
In vitro fertilization
rFSH
hMG
GnRH antagonist
Embryonic quality
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv In vitro fertilization
rFSH
hMG
GnRH antagonist
Embryonic quality
description Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate embryo quality (score) after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using rFSH or hMG with the GnRH antagonist protocol. Methods: Open, randomized, single center study. The patients were randomized to receive rFSH or hMG according to randomized cards inside a black envelope with the name of the respective treatment following a computer generated list (85 patients were allocated to rFSH group and 83 patients to hMG group). Inclusion criteria were patients with IVF indication and normal ovarian reserve. Embryo evaluation was performed on day three, after fertilization based on the Graduated Embryo Score (GES). Results: There were no relevant differences in demographic characteristics. There was no difference in pregnancy rates with 27 (31%) and 25 (30.1%) pregnancies for rFSH and hMG, respectively (p=0.87). The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significant higher for the rFSH group (77.33±34.0 x 65.07±33.2 p=0.03). The total number of embryos was statistical different, also in favor of the rFSH group (4.17±3.1 x 3.26±2.4 p=0.04). Conclusion: The total embryo score was the same for both groups, but the best embryo score was significantly higher for the rFSH group. Moreover, rFSH was associated with an increased number of embryos.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-08-21T04:39:41Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/247682
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1518-0557
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001148065
identifier_str_mv 1518-0557
001148065
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/247682
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv JBRA assisted reproduction. Brasília. Vol. 24, no. 1 (2021), p. 131-135
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/247682/2/001148065.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/247682/1/001148065.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 67422eb78937fd15194e333ecff974d3
72c3c987b843e01e8356d543c85d815a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225066016407552