Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236559 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25-0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98-0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth. |
id |
UFRGS-2_4b69aec6e8f05b4c3c38165604f7e3d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/236559 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel LampertCavalheiro, Cleber ParadzinskiScherer, Maitê MunhozPedrotti, DjessicaBottezini, Paola ArosiRosa, Ricardo Abreu daCasagrande, LucianoLenzi, Tathiane Larissa2022-04-06T04:44:31Z20211519-0501http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236559001136089Objective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25-0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98-0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth.application/pdfengPesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 21, (2021), e0016, 10 p.Preparo de canal radicularRevisão sistemáticaDente decíduoRoot canal preparationSystematic reviewDeciduous toothReciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001136089.pdf.txt001136089.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain37034http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236559/2/001136089.pdf.txt8dcdb4973438b500c929b4c7266398d7MD52ORIGINAL001136089.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf818718http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236559/1/001136089.pdf0b246dc99e2943623c2b3871d45be1eaMD5110183/2365592022-04-20 04:46:41.601409oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/236559Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-04-20T07:46:41Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Preparo de canal radicular Revisão sistemática Dente decíduo Root canal preparation Systematic review Deciduous tooth |
title_short |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert |
author_facet |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi Rosa, Ricardo Abreu da Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi Rosa, Ricardo Abreu da Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi Rosa, Ricardo Abreu da Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Preparo de canal radicular Revisão sistemática Dente decíduo |
topic |
Preparo de canal radicular Revisão sistemática Dente decíduo Root canal preparation Systematic review Deciduous tooth |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Root canal preparation Systematic review Deciduous tooth |
description |
Objective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25-0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98-0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-06T04:44:31Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236559 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1519-0501 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001136089 |
identifier_str_mv |
1519-0501 001136089 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236559 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa brasileira em odontopediatria e clínica integrada. João Pessoa. Vol. 21, (2021), e0016, 10 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236559/2/001136089.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/236559/1/001136089.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8dcdb4973438b500c929b4c7266398d7 0b246dc99e2943623c2b3871d45be1ea |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801225052275867648 |