Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Petry, Bruna Lucian
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bodanezi, Augusto, Baldasso, Flávia Emi Razera, Costa, Débora Delai, Larentis, Naiara Leites, Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo, Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180748
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of different gutta-percha points (Endo Points®, Dentsply®, Tanari®, Meta®, Roeko® and Odous®) in samples of 1 mm thick as established by ANSI/ADA Specification #57 and ISO 6876/2001, in comparison with thinner samples. Twelve test specimens for each material, four for each thickness (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mm and diameter of 8 mm), were laminated and compressed between two polished glass plates until the desirable thickness. Digital radiographs were obtained along with a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying from 1 to 10 mm in thickness. The X-ray unit was set at 70 kVp, 10 mA and 0.4 s exposure time, at a focal distance of 36 cm. One calibrated observer quantified the average values of pixels with Adobe Photoshop® software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, at 5% significance level. At 0.6 and 1 mm thickness, all the tested materials showed radiopacity higher than 3 mm of aluminum (reference value). At 0.3 mm thickness, Odous and Tanari presented significantly less radiopacity than the reference, and the other materials showed similar radiopacity to the reference. The study concluded that the materials demonstrated different radiopacities and all had values above the minimum recommended by ANSI/ ADA specification #57, being Odous and Tanari less radiopaque than the reference value in thinner samples (0.3mm).
id UFRGS-2_508037f140e9d7013f22a8f900631fb8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180748
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Petry, Bruna LucianBodanezi, AugustoBaldasso, Flávia Emi RazeraCosta, Débora DelaiLarentis, Naiara LeitesFontanella, Vania Regina CamargoKopper, Patrícia Maria Poli2018-07-28T02:46:19Z20170103-6440http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180748001058966The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of different gutta-percha points (Endo Points®, Dentsply®, Tanari®, Meta®, Roeko® and Odous®) in samples of 1 mm thick as established by ANSI/ADA Specification #57 and ISO 6876/2001, in comparison with thinner samples. Twelve test specimens for each material, four for each thickness (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mm and diameter of 8 mm), were laminated and compressed between two polished glass plates until the desirable thickness. Digital radiographs were obtained along with a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying from 1 to 10 mm in thickness. The X-ray unit was set at 70 kVp, 10 mA and 0.4 s exposure time, at a focal distance of 36 cm. One calibrated observer quantified the average values of pixels with Adobe Photoshop® software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, at 5% significance level. At 0.6 and 1 mm thickness, all the tested materials showed radiopacity higher than 3 mm of aluminum (reference value). At 0.3 mm thickness, Odous and Tanari presented significantly less radiopacity than the reference, and the other materials showed similar radiopacity to the reference. The study concluded that the materials demonstrated different radiopacities and all had values above the minimum recommended by ANSI/ ADA specification #57, being Odous and Tanari less radiopaque than the reference value in thinner samples (0.3mm).application/pdfengBrazilian dental journal. Ribeirão Preto. Vol. 28, no. 5 (Sept./Oct. 2017), p. 592-596EndodontiaRadiologiaInstrumentos odontológicosEndodonticsGuttaperchaRadiologyRadiopacityRadiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001058966.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf140234http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/1/001058966.pdfeb2da88347214cec6c799e86287eca55MD51TEXT001058966.pdf.txt001058966.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain23210http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/2/001058966.pdf.txt2413d7a6970140f9b3f366b74d5f47a2MD52THUMBNAIL001058966.pdf.jpg001058966.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2071http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/3/001058966.pdf.jpgadbb7c704c533521008909080d35fdbdMD5310183/1807482018-10-05 07:33:36.926oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180748Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-05T10:33:36Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
title Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
spellingShingle Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
Petry, Bruna Lucian
Endodontia
Radiologia
Instrumentos odontológicos
Endodontics
Guttapercha
Radiology
Radiopacity
title_short Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
title_full Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
title_fullStr Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
title_full_unstemmed Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
title_sort Radiopacity evaluation of gutta-percha points in thinner samples than the ANSI/ADA recommendation
author Petry, Bruna Lucian
author_facet Petry, Bruna Lucian
Bodanezi, Augusto
Baldasso, Flávia Emi Razera
Costa, Débora Delai
Larentis, Naiara Leites
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
author_role author
author2 Bodanezi, Augusto
Baldasso, Flávia Emi Razera
Costa, Débora Delai
Larentis, Naiara Leites
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Petry, Bruna Lucian
Bodanezi, Augusto
Baldasso, Flávia Emi Razera
Costa, Débora Delai
Larentis, Naiara Leites
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontia
Radiologia
Instrumentos odontológicos
topic Endodontia
Radiologia
Instrumentos odontológicos
Endodontics
Guttapercha
Radiology
Radiopacity
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Endodontics
Guttapercha
Radiology
Radiopacity
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of different gutta-percha points (Endo Points®, Dentsply®, Tanari®, Meta®, Roeko® and Odous®) in samples of 1 mm thick as established by ANSI/ADA Specification #57 and ISO 6876/2001, in comparison with thinner samples. Twelve test specimens for each material, four for each thickness (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mm and diameter of 8 mm), were laminated and compressed between two polished glass plates until the desirable thickness. Digital radiographs were obtained along with a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying from 1 to 10 mm in thickness. The X-ray unit was set at 70 kVp, 10 mA and 0.4 s exposure time, at a focal distance of 36 cm. One calibrated observer quantified the average values of pixels with Adobe Photoshop® software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, at 5% significance level. At 0.6 and 1 mm thickness, all the tested materials showed radiopacity higher than 3 mm of aluminum (reference value). At 0.3 mm thickness, Odous and Tanari presented significantly less radiopacity than the reference, and the other materials showed similar radiopacity to the reference. The study concluded that the materials demonstrated different radiopacities and all had values above the minimum recommended by ANSI/ ADA specification #57, being Odous and Tanari less radiopaque than the reference value in thinner samples (0.3mm).
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-28T02:46:19Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180748
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0103-6440
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001058966
identifier_str_mv 0103-6440
001058966
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180748
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian dental journal. Ribeirão Preto. Vol. 28, no. 5 (Sept./Oct. 2017), p. 592-596
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/1/001058966.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/2/001058966.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180748/3/001058966.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv eb2da88347214cec6c799e86287eca55
2413d7a6970140f9b3f366b74d5f47a2
adbb7c704c533521008909080d35fdbd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224947589185536