Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montagner, Anelise Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors, Raggio, Daniela Prócida, Van-de-Sande, F. H., Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270
Resumo: This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools.
id UFRGS-2_5938145b95900d01e52a34c71f82eed5
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267270
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Montagner, Anelise FernandesAngst, Patrícia Daniela MelchiorsRaggio, Daniela PrócidaVan-de-Sande, F. H.Tedesco, Tamara Kerber2023-11-18T03:26:32Z20231806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270001186310This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools.application/pdfengBrazilian Oral Research. Vol. 37 (2023), e062, 36 p.Metanálise em redeOdontologia baseada em evidênciasPesquisa médica translacionalNetwork meta-analysisEvidence-based dentistryTranslational science, biomedicaMethodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001186310.pdf.txt001186310.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain126433http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/2/001186310.pdf.txt5f36bcaef3318793874befa7f3c5c150MD52ORIGINAL001186310.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf482508http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/1/001186310.pdf39f434899562b7147873677033c758fbMD5110183/2672702023-11-19 04:21:38.842946oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267270Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:38Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
title Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
spellingShingle Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
Montagner, Anelise Fernandes
Metanálise em rede
Odontologia baseada em evidências
Pesquisa médica translacional
Network meta-analysis
Evidence-based dentistry
Translational science, biomedica
title_short Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
title_full Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
title_fullStr Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
title_full_unstemmed Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
title_sort Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
author Montagner, Anelise Fernandes
author_facet Montagner, Anelise Fernandes
Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Van-de-Sande, F. H.
Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
author_role author
author2 Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Van-de-Sande, F. H.
Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montagner, Anelise Fernandes
Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors
Raggio, Daniela Prócida
Van-de-Sande, F. H.
Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metanálise em rede
Odontologia baseada em evidências
Pesquisa médica translacional
topic Metanálise em rede
Odontologia baseada em evidências
Pesquisa médica translacional
Network meta-analysis
Evidence-based dentistry
Translational science, biomedica
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Network meta-analysis
Evidence-based dentistry
Translational science, biomedica
description This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-11-18T03:26:32Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1806-8324
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001186310
identifier_str_mv 1806-8324
001186310
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research. Vol. 37 (2023), e062, 36 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/2/001186310.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/1/001186310.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 5f36bcaef3318793874befa7f3c5c150
39f434899562b7147873677033c758fb
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447845256298496