Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270 |
Resumo: | This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools. |
id |
UFRGS-2_5938145b95900d01e52a34c71f82eed5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267270 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Montagner, Anelise FernandesAngst, Patrícia Daniela MelchiorsRaggio, Daniela PrócidaVan-de-Sande, F. H.Tedesco, Tamara Kerber2023-11-18T03:26:32Z20231806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270001186310This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools.application/pdfengBrazilian Oral Research. Vol. 37 (2023), e062, 36 p.Metanálise em redeOdontologia baseada em evidênciasPesquisa médica translacionalNetwork meta-analysisEvidence-based dentistryTranslational science, biomedicaMethodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001186310.pdf.txt001186310.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain126433http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/2/001186310.pdf.txt5f36bcaef3318793874befa7f3c5c150MD52ORIGINAL001186310.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf482508http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/1/001186310.pdf39f434899562b7147873677033c758fbMD5110183/2672702023-11-19 04:21:38.842946oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267270Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:38Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
title |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
spellingShingle |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research Montagner, Anelise Fernandes Metanálise em rede Odontologia baseada em evidências Pesquisa médica translacional Network meta-analysis Evidence-based dentistry Translational science, biomedica |
title_short |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
title_full |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
title_fullStr |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
title_sort |
Methodological quality of network meta-analysis in dentistry : a meta-research |
author |
Montagner, Anelise Fernandes |
author_facet |
Montagner, Anelise Fernandes Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors Raggio, Daniela Prócida Van-de-Sande, F. H. Tedesco, Tamara Kerber |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors Raggio, Daniela Prócida Van-de-Sande, F. H. Tedesco, Tamara Kerber |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montagner, Anelise Fernandes Angst, Patrícia Daniela Melchiors Raggio, Daniela Prócida Van-de-Sande, F. H. Tedesco, Tamara Kerber |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Metanálise em rede Odontologia baseada em evidências Pesquisa médica translacional |
topic |
Metanálise em rede Odontologia baseada em evidências Pesquisa médica translacional Network meta-analysis Evidence-based dentistry Translational science, biomedica |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Network meta-analysis Evidence-based dentistry Translational science, biomedica |
description |
This meta-research aimed to provide an overview of the methodological quality and risk of bias of network meta-analyses (NMA) in dentistry. Searches for NMA of randomized clinical trials with clinical outcomes in dentistry were performed in databases up to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened titles/ abstracts, selected full texts, and extracted the data. The adherence to PRISMA-NMA reporting guideline, the AMSTAR-2 methodological quality tool, and the ROBIS risk of bias tool were assessed in the studies. Correlation between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results was also investigated. Sixty-two NMA studies were included and presented varied methodological quality. According to AMSTAR-2, half of the NMA presented moderate quality (n = 32; 51.6%). The adherence to PRISMA-NMA also varied. Only 36 studies (58.1%) prospectively registered the protocol. Other issues lacking of reporting were data related were data related to the NMA geometry and the assessment of results consistency, and the evaluation of risk of bias across the studies. ROBIS assessment showed a high risk of bias mainly for domains 1 (study eligibility criteria) and 2 (identification and selection of studies). Correlation coefficients between the PRISMA-NMA adherence and the AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS results showed moderate correlation (rho < 0.6). Overall, NMA studies in dentistry were of moderate quality and at high risk of bias in several domains, especially study selection. Future reviews should be better planned and conducted and have higher compliance with reporting and quality assessment tools. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-18T03:26:32Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1806-8324 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001186310 |
identifier_str_mv |
1806-8324 001186310 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267270 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research. Vol. 37 (2023), e062, 36 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/2/001186310.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267270/1/001186310.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5f36bcaef3318793874befa7f3c5c150 39f434899562b7147873677033c758fb |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447845256298496 |