Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/265629 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice. Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity. Patients and methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%. Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries. |
id |
UFRGS-2_7e6b4bd5442e172c30aa6efa54c4c1be |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/265629 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Santos, Isabela AraujoBrenol, Claiton ViegasXavier, Ricardo MachadoPinheiro, Geraldo da Rocha Castelar2023-10-03T03:36:10Z20221932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/265629001176070Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice. Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity. Patients and methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%. Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries.application/pdfengPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 9 (Sept. 2022), e0273789, 16 p.Artrite reumatóideDiagnósticoBases de dados factuaisProgressão da doençaComparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL studyEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001176070.pdf.txt001176070.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain53925http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/265629/2/001176070.pdf.txt2d2b7cdebafd61634a67bea63b82acaeMD52ORIGINAL001176070.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf838155http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/265629/1/001176070.pdf81deeef07657b4c7c62fb4174481e707MD5110183/2656292023-10-04 03:39:29.694498oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/265629Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-10-04T06:39:29Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
title |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study Santos, Isabela Araujo Artrite reumatóide Diagnóstico Bases de dados factuais Progressão da doença |
title_short |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
title_full |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
title_sort |
Comparison of rheumatoid arthritis composite disease activity indices and residual activity in a Brazilian multicenter study - REAL study |
author |
Santos, Isabela Araujo |
author_facet |
Santos, Isabela Araujo Brenol, Claiton Viegas Xavier, Ricardo Machado Pinheiro, Geraldo da Rocha Castelar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Brenol, Claiton Viegas Xavier, Ricardo Machado Pinheiro, Geraldo da Rocha Castelar |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Isabela Araujo Brenol, Claiton Viegas Xavier, Ricardo Machado Pinheiro, Geraldo da Rocha Castelar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artrite reumatóide Diagnóstico Bases de dados factuais Progressão da doença |
topic |
Artrite reumatóide Diagnóstico Bases de dados factuais Progressão da doença |
description |
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice. Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity. Patients and methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%. Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-03T03:36:10Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/265629 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001176070 |
identifier_str_mv |
1932-6203 001176070 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/265629 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
PloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 9 (Sept. 2022), e0273789, 16 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/265629/2/001176070.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/265629/1/001176070.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
2d2b7cdebafd61634a67bea63b82acae 81deeef07657b4c7c62fb4174481e707 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447841041022976 |