Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340 |
Resumo: | For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature. |
id |
UFRGS-2_8cce5072961739b5fbbd5ebe41d256b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180340 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Zillig, Raphael2018-07-10T02:33:34Z20181981-9471http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340001070733For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature.application/pdfporJournal of ancient philosophy. São Paulo. Vol. 12, n. 1 (2018), p. 129-172Aristóteles, 384-322 A.CÉticaFilosofiaDialética e o método da ética em Aristótelesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001070733.pdf001070733.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf519885http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/1/001070733.pdfedb2b5cbbf82d383c9555b21b0e41c45MD51TEXT001070733.pdf.txt001070733.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain135552http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/2/001070733.pdf.txt33cb72bcf3ee9bae1bd3b3cb05e765eeMD5210183/1803402023-09-24 03:39:38.96546oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180340Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-24T06:39:38Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
title |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
spellingShingle |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles Zillig, Raphael Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C Ética Filosofia |
title_short |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
title_full |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
title_fullStr |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
title_sort |
Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles |
author |
Zillig, Raphael |
author_facet |
Zillig, Raphael |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zillig, Raphael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C Ética Filosofia |
topic |
Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C Ética Filosofia |
description |
For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-10T02:33:34Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1981-9471 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001070733 |
identifier_str_mv |
1981-9471 001070733 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of ancient philosophy. São Paulo. Vol. 12, n. 1 (2018), p. 129-172 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/1/001070733.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/2/001070733.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
edb2b5cbbf82d383c9555b21b0e41c45 33cb72bcf3ee9bae1bd3b3cb05e765ee |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798487379110002688 |