Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zillig, Raphael
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340
Resumo: For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature.
id UFRGS-2_8cce5072961739b5fbbd5ebe41d256b2
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180340
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Zillig, Raphael2018-07-10T02:33:34Z20181981-9471http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340001070733For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature.application/pdfporJournal of ancient philosophy. São Paulo. Vol. 12, n. 1 (2018), p. 129-172Aristóteles, 384-322 A.CÉticaFilosofiaDialética e o método da ética em Aristótelesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001070733.pdf001070733.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf519885http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/1/001070733.pdfedb2b5cbbf82d383c9555b21b0e41c45MD51TEXT001070733.pdf.txt001070733.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain135552http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/2/001070733.pdf.txt33cb72bcf3ee9bae1bd3b3cb05e765eeMD5210183/1803402023-09-24 03:39:38.96546oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180340Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-24T06:39:38Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
title Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
spellingShingle Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
Zillig, Raphael
Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C
Ética
Filosofia
title_short Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
title_full Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
title_fullStr Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
title_full_unstemmed Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
title_sort Dialética e o método da ética em Aristóteles
author Zillig, Raphael
author_facet Zillig, Raphael
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zillig, Raphael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C
Ética
Filosofia
topic Aristóteles, 384-322 A.C
Ética
Filosofia
description For the last decades, the thesis according to which dialectic provides the core methodological standard for Aristotle’s practical philosophy has had wide acceptance. This thesis has been associated to the much-discussed methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1, 1145b2-7. As a matter of fact, the traditional reading of that passage finds in it a procedure that is based on the survey of aporiai that have been drawn from a set of endoxa or “reputable opinions”. As the procedure so understood is thoroughly focused on endoxa and in virtue of its diaporematic approach, it can be related to dialectic as it is discussed in the Topics. In this paper, I intend to address the limitations of the traditional interpretation and put forward an alternative reading for the methodological passage of Nicomachean Ethics VII 1. In the proposed reading, the passage does not have a tight connection with dialectic. From this it does not follow that dialectical procedures play no role in the method of Aristotle’s practical philosophy. However, in the proposed reading the passage of NE VII 1 no longer provides the basis for the thesis that such method is to be understood as being fundamentally dialectical in its nature.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-10T02:33:34Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1981-9471
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001070733
identifier_str_mv 1981-9471
001070733
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180340
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of ancient philosophy. São Paulo. Vol. 12, n. 1 (2018), p. 129-172
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/1/001070733.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180340/2/001070733.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv edb2b5cbbf82d383c9555b21b0e41c45
33cb72bcf3ee9bae1bd3b3cb05e765ee
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487379110002688