Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crestani, Ana Paula
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Boos, Flávia Zacouteguy, Haubrich, Josué, Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo, Santana, Fabiana, Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran, Cassini, Lindsey Freitas, Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira, Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225574
Resumo: Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way.
id UFRGS-2_93d4fe2b36b46b6df2f7fe39b3f6df19
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225574
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Crestani, Ana PaulaBoos, Flávia ZacouteguyHaubrich, JosuéOrdoñez Sierra, RodrigoSantana, FabianaMolina, Johanna Marcela DuranCassini, Lindsey FreitasAlvares, Lucas de OliveiraQuillfeldt, Jorge Alberto2021-08-12T04:43:43Z20152045-2322http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225574000977397Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way.application/pdfengScientific reports. London. Vol. 5, (2015), 13633, 1-9 p.MemóriaMemory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivationEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT000977397.pdf.txt000977397.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain38098http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225574/2/000977397.pdf.txt25a61071a38f2af1d671050fa59017c9MD52ORIGINAL000977397.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf715021http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225574/1/000977397.pdf0e88bad400a52a95286c3ac9869a1e75MD5110183/2255742021-08-18 04:37:30.15487oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225574Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:37:30Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
spellingShingle Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
Crestani, Ana Paula
Memória
title_short Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_full Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_fullStr Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_full_unstemmed Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_sort Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
author Crestani, Ana Paula
author_facet Crestani, Ana Paula
Boos, Flávia Zacouteguy
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
author_role author
author2 Boos, Flávia Zacouteguy
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crestani, Ana Paula
Boos, Flávia Zacouteguy
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Memória
topic Memória
description Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-08-12T04:43:43Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225574
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2045-2322
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000977397
identifier_str_mv 2045-2322
000977397
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225574
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Scientific reports. London. Vol. 5, (2015), 13633, 1-9 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225574/2/000977397.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225574/1/000977397.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 25a61071a38f2af1d671050fa59017c9
0e88bad400a52a95286c3ac9869a1e75
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225032149499904