Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Qin, Lu
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Constantin, Jean-Michel, Nieszkowska, Ania, Elman, Marilia, Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios, Rouby, Jean-Jacques
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426
Resumo: Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable.
id UFRGS-2_a16719d206e961655e4e34f2edff1a85
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150426
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Qin, LuConstantin, Jean-MichelNieszkowska, AniaElman, MariliaVieira, Silvia Regina RiosRouby, Jean-Jacques2017-01-04T02:27:01Z2006http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426000549370Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable.application/pdfengCritical care. Oxford. Vol. 10, no. 3 (June, 2006), p. 1-10Sindrome do desconforto respiratórioPressão arterialMeasurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curveEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000549370.pdf000549370.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1635240http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/1/000549370.pdfbbc5dee45bbe33fd54ceb35fabe3dd9cMD51TEXT000549370.pdf.txt000549370.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain47724http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/2/000549370.pdf.txte6f2a9642b73098ba047063a337dd482MD52THUMBNAIL000549370.pdf.jpg000549370.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2128http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/3/000549370.pdf.jpgd6e883c0c2aed3df0dc34eae594b6255MD5310183/1504262022-06-05 04:42:48.042145oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150426Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-06-05T07:42:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
title Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
spellingShingle Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
Qin, Lu
Sindrome do desconforto respiratório
Pressão arterial
title_short Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
title_full Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
title_fullStr Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
title_sort Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
author Qin, Lu
author_facet Qin, Lu
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Nieszkowska, Ania
Elman, Marilia
Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios
Rouby, Jean-Jacques
author_role author
author2 Constantin, Jean-Michel
Nieszkowska, Ania
Elman, Marilia
Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios
Rouby, Jean-Jacques
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Qin, Lu
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Nieszkowska, Ania
Elman, Marilia
Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios
Rouby, Jean-Jacques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sindrome do desconforto respiratório
Pressão arterial
topic Sindrome do desconforto respiratório
Pressão arterial
description Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-01-04T02:27:01Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000549370
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426
identifier_str_mv 000549370
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Critical care. Oxford. Vol. 10, no. 3 (June, 2006), p. 1-10
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/1/000549370.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/2/000549370.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/3/000549370.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bbc5dee45bbe33fd54ceb35fabe3dd9c
e6f2a9642b73098ba047063a337dd482
d6e883c0c2aed3df0dc34eae594b6255
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224912586670080