Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426 |
Resumo: | Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable. |
id |
UFRGS-2_a16719d206e961655e4e34f2edff1a85 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150426 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Qin, LuConstantin, Jean-MichelNieszkowska, AniaElman, MariliaVieira, Silvia Regina RiosRouby, Jean-Jacques2017-01-04T02:27:01Z2006http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426000549370Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable.application/pdfengCritical care. Oxford. Vol. 10, no. 3 (June, 2006), p. 1-10Sindrome do desconforto respiratórioPressão arterialMeasurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curveEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000549370.pdf000549370.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1635240http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/1/000549370.pdfbbc5dee45bbe33fd54ceb35fabe3dd9cMD51TEXT000549370.pdf.txt000549370.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain47724http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/2/000549370.pdf.txte6f2a9642b73098ba047063a337dd482MD52THUMBNAIL000549370.pdf.jpg000549370.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2128http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/3/000549370.pdf.jpgd6e883c0c2aed3df0dc34eae594b6255MD5310183/1504262022-06-05 04:42:48.042145oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150426Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-06-05T07:42:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
title |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
spellingShingle |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve Qin, Lu Sindrome do desconforto respiratório Pressão arterial |
title_short |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
title_full |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
title_fullStr |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
title_sort |
Measurement of alveolar derecruitment in patients with acute lung injury : computerized tomography versus pressure-volume curve |
author |
Qin, Lu |
author_facet |
Qin, Lu Constantin, Jean-Michel Nieszkowska, Ania Elman, Marilia Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios Rouby, Jean-Jacques |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Constantin, Jean-Michel Nieszkowska, Ania Elman, Marilia Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios Rouby, Jean-Jacques |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Qin, Lu Constantin, Jean-Michel Nieszkowska, Ania Elman, Marilia Vieira, Silvia Regina Rios Rouby, Jean-Jacques |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sindrome do desconforto respiratório Pressão arterial |
topic |
Sindrome do desconforto respiratório Pressão arterial |
description |
Introduction Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced lung derecruitment can be assessed by a pressure–volume (P– V) curve method or by lung computed tomography (CT). However, only the first method can be used at the bedside. The aim of the study was to compare both methods for assessing alveolar derecruitment after the removal of PEEP in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methods P–V curves (constant-flow method) and spiral CT scans of the whole lung were performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O in 19 patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Alveolar derecruitment was defined as the difference in lung volume measured at an airway pressure of 15 cmH2O on P–V curves performed at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O, and as the difference in the CT volume of gas present in poorly aerated and nonaerated lung regions at PEEPs of 15 and 0 cmH2O. Results Alveolar derecruitments measured by the CT and P–V curve methods were 373 ± 250 and 345 ± 208 ml (p = 0.14), respectively. Measurements by both methods were tightly correlated (R = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The derecruited volume measured by the P–V curve method had a bias of -14 ml and limits of agreement of between -158 and +130 ml in comparison with the average derecruited volume of the CT and P–V curve methods. Conclusion Alveolar derecruitment measured by the CT and P– V curve methods are tightly correlated. However, the large limits of agreement indicate that the P–V curve and the CT method are not interchangeable. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2006 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-04T02:27:01Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000549370 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150426 |
identifier_str_mv |
000549370 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Critical care. Oxford. Vol. 10, no. 3 (June, 2006), p. 1-10 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/1/000549370.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/2/000549370.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150426/3/000549370.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bbc5dee45bbe33fd54ceb35fabe3dd9c e6f2a9642b73098ba047063a337dd482 d6e883c0c2aed3df0dc34eae594b6255 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224912586670080 |