Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kumar, Yogesh
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat, Amico, Sandro Campos, Dolez, Patricia, Manes, Andrea, Hogan, James D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346
Resumo: This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites.
id UFRGS-2_afe4cb6ffa9e352255304ef45937d183
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274346
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Kumar, YogeshBalasbaneh, Mohammad RezasefatAmico, Sandro CamposDolez, PatriciaManes, AndreaHogan, James D.2024-03-28T06:25:01Z20240263-8231http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346001196853This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites.application/pdfengThin-walled structures. Oxford. Vol. 197 (Apr. 2024), art. 111611, p. 1-22CompósitosEnsaios de impactoTaxa de deformaçãoWoven compositesLow-velocity impactStrain-rate dependencyInterlaminar and intralaminar failureNon-physical parametersLS-DynaComparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven compositesEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001196853.pdf.txt001196853.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain109275http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/2/001196853.pdf.txt690cbf6b0cfa497b09455548feae4d27MD52ORIGINAL001196853.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf8004775http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/1/001196853.pdf5cc830b84e687531522ab8fb5d4d2884MD5110183/2743462024-03-29 06:19:33.211256oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274346Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-03-29T09:19:33Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
title Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
spellingShingle Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
Kumar, Yogesh
Compósitos
Ensaios de impacto
Taxa de deformação
Woven composites
Low-velocity impact
Strain-rate dependency
Interlaminar and intralaminar failure
Non-physical parameters
LS-Dyna
title_short Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
title_full Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
title_fullStr Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
title_sort Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
author Kumar, Yogesh
author_facet Kumar, Yogesh
Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat
Amico, Sandro Campos
Dolez, Patricia
Manes, Andrea
Hogan, James D.
author_role author
author2 Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat
Amico, Sandro Campos
Dolez, Patricia
Manes, Andrea
Hogan, James D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kumar, Yogesh
Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat
Amico, Sandro Campos
Dolez, Patricia
Manes, Andrea
Hogan, James D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Compósitos
Ensaios de impacto
Taxa de deformação
topic Compósitos
Ensaios de impacto
Taxa de deformação
Woven composites
Low-velocity impact
Strain-rate dependency
Interlaminar and intralaminar failure
Non-physical parameters
LS-Dyna
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Woven composites
Low-velocity impact
Strain-rate dependency
Interlaminar and intralaminar failure
Non-physical parameters
LS-Dyna
description This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-03-28T06:25:01Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0263-8231
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001196853
identifier_str_mv 0263-8231
001196853
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Thin-walled structures. Oxford. Vol. 197 (Apr. 2024), art. 111611, p. 1-22
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/2/001196853.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/1/001196853.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 690cbf6b0cfa497b09455548feae4d27
5cc830b84e687531522ab8fb5d4d2884
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225115318353920