Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346 |
Resumo: | This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites. |
id |
UFRGS-2_afe4cb6ffa9e352255304ef45937d183 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274346 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Kumar, YogeshBalasbaneh, Mohammad RezasefatAmico, Sandro CamposDolez, PatriciaManes, AndreaHogan, James D.2024-03-28T06:25:01Z20240263-8231http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346001196853This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites.application/pdfengThin-walled structures. Oxford. Vol. 197 (Apr. 2024), art. 111611, p. 1-22CompósitosEnsaios de impactoTaxa de deformaçãoWoven compositesLow-velocity impactStrain-rate dependencyInterlaminar and intralaminar failureNon-physical parametersLS-DynaComparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven compositesEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001196853.pdf.txt001196853.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain109275http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/2/001196853.pdf.txt690cbf6b0cfa497b09455548feae4d27MD52ORIGINAL001196853.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf8004775http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/1/001196853.pdf5cc830b84e687531522ab8fb5d4d2884MD5110183/2743462024-03-29 06:19:33.211256oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274346Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-03-29T09:19:33Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
title |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites Kumar, Yogesh Compósitos Ensaios de impacto Taxa de deformação Woven composites Low-velocity impact Strain-rate dependency Interlaminar and intralaminar failure Non-physical parameters LS-Dyna |
title_short |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
title_full |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
title_sort |
Comparison of two progressive damage models for predicting low-velocity impact behavior of woven composites |
author |
Kumar, Yogesh |
author_facet |
Kumar, Yogesh Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat Amico, Sandro Campos Dolez, Patricia Manes, Andrea Hogan, James D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat Amico, Sandro Campos Dolez, Patricia Manes, Andrea Hogan, James D. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kumar, Yogesh Balasbaneh, Mohammad Rezasefat Amico, Sandro Campos Dolez, Patricia Manes, Andrea Hogan, James D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Compósitos Ensaios de impacto Taxa de deformação |
topic |
Compósitos Ensaios de impacto Taxa de deformação Woven composites Low-velocity impact Strain-rate dependency Interlaminar and intralaminar failure Non-physical parameters LS-Dyna |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Woven composites Low-velocity impact Strain-rate dependency Interlaminar and intralaminar failure Non-physical parameters LS-Dyna |
description |
This research focuses on comparing the two progressive damage models available in the explicit nonlinear finite element software LS-Dyna. To explore the prediction capabilities in terms of mechanical response and dominating failure modes in S2 glass woven composites, low velocity impact response at four different energies ranging from 27.9 J to 109.7 J were considered in this study. A macro-homogeneous solid element formulated finite element model was simulated to understand the response and failure mechanics in the laminate under low-velocity impact. The material modeling was carried out utilizing the MAT 55 and MAT 162 material models. An effort has been made for robust calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters in both material cards for accurate predictions. The prediction capabilities of the models were then examined by comparing them against the experimental results, which fall within the deviation of 11%. The results show that MAT 162 yields a better resemblance with the damage morphology patterns and the delamination for the accounted impact zone, due to inclusion of strain-rate effect. Overall, this paper provides insight into the limitations and advantages of both material models, which establishes the route for the selection of the appropriate material model for simulating impact behavior in woven composites. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-28T06:25:01Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0263-8231 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001196853 |
identifier_str_mv |
0263-8231 001196853 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274346 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Thin-walled structures. Oxford. Vol. 197 (Apr. 2024), art. 111611, p. 1-22 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/2/001196853.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274346/1/001196853.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
690cbf6b0cfa497b09455548feae4d27 5cc830b84e687531522ab8fb5d4d2884 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447857763713024 |