Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826 |
Resumo: | Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients. |
id |
UFRGS-2_b3d221d0c40088f90dece5103dc89de6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199826 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Schneiders, JosianeTeló, Gabriela HeidenBottino, Leonardo GrabinskiPasinato, BrunaNeyeloff, Jeruza LavanholiSchaan, Beatriz D'Agord2019-09-28T03:47:35Z20191758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826001100030Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients.application/pdfengDiabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. vol. 11 (2019), 34, 9 f.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúdeType 2 diabetes mellitusQuality indicatorsPrimary health careTertiary health careQuality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity levelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001100030.pdf.txt001100030.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain37883http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/2/001100030.pdf.txt499b0f4a071d2b0988d50d9e8826de77MD52ORIGINAL001100030.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1070405http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/1/001100030.pdf52f7d800735a4d3de5bb2efa374ed63eMD5110183/1998262019-09-29 03:45:40.036979oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199826Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-09-29T06:45:40Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
spellingShingle |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level Schneiders, Josiane Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde Type 2 diabetes mellitus Quality indicators Primary health care Tertiary health care |
title_short |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_full |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_fullStr |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
title_sort |
Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level |
author |
Schneiders, Josiane |
author_facet |
Schneiders, Josiane Teló, Gabriela Heiden Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teló, Gabriela Heiden Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schneiders, Josiane Teló, Gabriela Heiden Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski Pasinato, Bruna Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde |
topic |
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde Type 2 diabetes mellitus Quality indicators Primary health care Tertiary health care |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Quality indicators Primary health care Tertiary health care |
description |
Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-28T03:47:35Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1758-5996 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001100030 |
identifier_str_mv |
1758-5996 001100030 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. vol. 11 (2019), 34, 9 f. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/2/001100030.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/1/001100030.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
499b0f4a071d2b0988d50d9e8826de77 52f7d800735a4d3de5bb2efa374ed63e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447695919153152 |