Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schneiders, Josiane
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Teló, Gabriela Heiden, Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski, Pasinato, Bruna, Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi, Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826
Resumo: Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients.
id UFRGS-2_b3d221d0c40088f90dece5103dc89de6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199826
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Schneiders, JosianeTeló, Gabriela HeidenBottino, Leonardo GrabinskiPasinato, BrunaNeyeloff, Jeruza LavanholiSchaan, Beatriz D'Agord2019-09-28T03:47:35Z20191758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826001100030Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients.application/pdfengDiabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. vol. 11 (2019), 34, 9 f.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúdeType 2 diabetes mellitusQuality indicatorsPrimary health careTertiary health careQuality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity levelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001100030.pdf.txt001100030.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain37883http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/2/001100030.pdf.txt499b0f4a071d2b0988d50d9e8826de77MD52ORIGINAL001100030.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1070405http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/1/001100030.pdf52f7d800735a4d3de5bb2efa374ed63eMD5110183/1998262019-09-29 03:45:40.036979oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199826Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-09-29T06:45:40Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
spellingShingle Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
Schneiders, Josiane
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Quality indicators
Primary health care
Tertiary health care
title_short Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_full Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_fullStr Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
title_sort Quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care: analysis per care-complexity level
author Schneiders, Josiane
author_facet Schneiders, Josiane
Teló, Gabriela Heiden
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
author_role author
author2 Teló, Gabriela Heiden
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schneiders, Josiane
Teló, Gabriela Heiden
Bottino, Leonardo Grabinski
Pasinato, Bruna
Neyeloff, Jeruza Lavanholi
Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde
topic Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Indicadores de qualidade em assistência à saúde
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Quality indicators
Primary health care
Tertiary health care
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Quality indicators
Primary health care
Tertiary health care
description Background: This study was developed to evaluate quality indicators in type 2 diabetes patient care at the Unified Public Health System’s primary and tertiary health care centers within a local population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 488 patients with type 2 diabetes (148 in each primary health care unit, ESF and UBS, and 192 at the tertiary health care unit) with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate the following care quality indicators: nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy tests, yearly lipid profile and nutritional assessments, and an inquiry about tobacco use. The presence of > 50% of the quality of care assessment measures was considered acceptable. Indicators were also evaluated in relation to patients without proper diabetes control (HbA1c > 8.5%). Results: In the results, a high percentage of patients were excluded specifically for not presenting the two HbA1c tests within a year (n = 208, 58.1% at ESF; n = 225, 58.4% at UBS; and n = 39, 16.9% at the tertiary health care unit). From the included patients, only 7 (4.7%) at ESF, 7 (4.7%) at UBS, and 52 (27.0%) at the tertiary health care unit showed > 50% of the quality criteria covered. When only patients without proper diabetes control were evaluated, none of them at any of the health care units showed all the quality criteria covered. Conclusions: Our results show a low percentage of care assessment measures at each evaluated health care unit, pointing out the need to improve the protocols and care lines of diabetic patients.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-09-28T03:47:35Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1758-5996
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001100030
identifier_str_mv 1758-5996
001100030
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199826
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. London. vol. 11 (2019), 34, 9 f.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/2/001100030.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199826/1/001100030.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 499b0f4a071d2b0988d50d9e8826de77
52f7d800735a4d3de5bb2efa374ed63e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447695919153152