Comparative evaluation of five hydrological models in a large-scale and tropical river basin

• Autor(a) principal: Ávila, Leandro
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Silveira, Reinaldo Bomfim da, Campos, André, Silva, Nathalli Rogiski da, Gonçalves, José Eduardo, Almeida, Arlan Scortegagna, Freitas, Camila, Aver, Cássia Silmara, Fan, Fernando Mainardi
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253326
• topic: Gestão de recursos hídricos; Vazões : Simulação; Modelos hidrológicos; Usinas hidrelétricas; Tocantins, Rio, Bacia; Hydrological model; Water balance; Hydropower plant; Water resources

Hydrological modeling is an important tool for water resources management, providing a feasible solution to represent the main hydrological processes and predict future streamflow regimes. The literature presents a set of hydrological models commonly used to represent the rainfallrunoff process in watersheds with different meteorological and geomorphological characteristics. The response of such models could differ significantly for a single precipitation event, given the uncertainties associated with the input data, parameters, and model structure. In this way, a correct hydrological representation of a watershed should include the evaluation of different hydrological models. This study explores the use and performance of five hydrological models to represent daily streamflow regimes at six hydropower plants located in the Tocantins river basin (Brazil). The adopted models include the GR4J, HYMOD, HBV, SMAP, and MGB-IPH. The evaluation of each model was elaborated considering the calibration (2014–2019) and validation period (2005–2010) using observed data of precipitation and climatological variables. Deterministic metrics and statistical tests were used to measure the performance of each model. For the calibration stage, results show that all models achieved a satisfactory performance with NSE values greater than 0.6. For the validation stage, only the MGB-IPH model present a good performance with NSE values greater than 0.7. A bias correction procedure were applied to correct the simulated data of conceptual models. However, the statistical tests exposed that only the MGB-IPH model could preserve the main statistical properties of the observed data. Thus, this study discusses and presents some limitations of the lumped model to represent daily streamflows in large-scale river basins (>50,000 km²).