Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azambuja, Fernanda Braga
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Beghetto, Mariur Gomes, Assis, Michelli Cristina Silva de, Mello, Elza Daniel de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129895
Resumo: Objectives: to evaluate the agreement between oral feeding by patients and chart records of this acceptance. Method: Besides the food intake surveys of surgical patients, the nursing records of nutrition were evaluated. Is was considered good oral feeding: intake ≥ 75% of total calories prescribed at the day; medium acceptance: 50 to 74.9%; low acceptance: < 50% and NPO (nothing per oral). The Kappa coefficient was adopted to assess agreement. Results: there were similar answers between patient and nursing records in 91.3% of NPO situations, 87.1% for good oral feeding, 17.8% for medium acceptance and 16.5% for low acceptance (Kappa = 0.45). Conclusion: agreement between patient’s reports and nursing records was moderate to low. A higher proportion of similar answers were observed when the patients related good oral feeding or NPO.
id UFRGS-2_d8b1dbb6ab699cb936ebbdc1985ca853
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/129895
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Azambuja, Fernanda BragaBeghetto, Mariur GomesAssis, Michelli Cristina Silva deMello, Elza Daniel de2015-11-19T02:39:30Z20150212-1611http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129895000969965Objectives: to evaluate the agreement between oral feeding by patients and chart records of this acceptance. Method: Besides the food intake surveys of surgical patients, the nursing records of nutrition were evaluated. Is was considered good oral feeding: intake ≥ 75% of total calories prescribed at the day; medium acceptance: 50 to 74.9%; low acceptance: < 50% and NPO (nothing per oral). The Kappa coefficient was adopted to assess agreement. Results: there were similar answers between patient and nursing records in 91.3% of NPO situations, 87.1% for good oral feeding, 17.8% for medium acceptance and 16.5% for low acceptance (Kappa = 0.45). Conclusion: agreement between patient’s reports and nursing records was moderate to low. A higher proportion of similar answers were observed when the patients related good oral feeding or NPO.Objetivo: evaluar la concordancia entre la aceptación de la dieta oral reportada por los pacientes y los registros en prontuario de esta aceptación. Método: fueron evaluados el consumo de alimentos y los registros de la ingestión en prontuario por las enfermeras. Se consideró “buena aceptación”: la ingesta de ≥ 75% de las calorías totales prescritas por día, “regular aceptación”: de 50 a 74,9%; “baja aceptación”: < 50% y NPO (nada por la boca). Para la evaluación de la concordancia fue utilizado el coeficiente Kappa. Resultados: la proporción de respuestas coincidentes entre el relato del paciente y el registro de las enfermeras fue 91,3% en casos de NPO, 87,1% para “buena aceptación”, 17,8% para “regular aceptación” y 16.5% para “baja aceptación” (Kappa = 0,45). Conclusión: la concordancia entre los relatos de los pacientes y los registros de las enfermeras fue de moderada a débil. Hubo una mayor proporción de respuestas coincidentes cuando los pacientes informaron “buena aceptación” o cuando había NPO prescrito.application/pdfengNutricion hospitalaria. Madrid. Vol. 31, no. 6 (2015), p. 2735-2739Ingestão de alimentosRegistros de enfermagemHospitalizaçãoFood IntakeNursing RecordsHospitalizationIngestión de AlimentosRegistros de EnfermeríaHospitalizaciónFood intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?Aceptacion de la dieta oral reportada por pacientes y los registros de enfermeras : existe acuerdo en pacientes quirurgicos?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000969965.pdf000969965.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf314220http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/1/000969965.pdf6fa40c83a2c104a020f50ed6530f9fb7MD51TEXT000969965.pdf.txt000969965.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain21116http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/2/000969965.pdf.txt9db743a47c9879d9dc976c66e1c5546fMD52THUMBNAIL000969965.pdf.jpg000969965.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1721http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/3/000969965.pdf.jpg4fd3b9e5eb7b666bd656e5ae6c0303e4MD5310183/1298952022-09-07 04:50:56.894825oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/129895Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-09-07T07:50:56Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
dc.title.alternative.es.fl_str_mv Aceptacion de la dieta oral reportada por pacientes y los registros de enfermeras : existe acuerdo en pacientes quirurgicos?
title Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
spellingShingle Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
Azambuja, Fernanda Braga
Ingestão de alimentos
Registros de enfermagem
Hospitalização
Food Intake
Nursing Records
Hospitalization
Ingestión de Alimentos
Registros de Enfermería
Hospitalización
title_short Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
title_full Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
title_fullStr Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
title_full_unstemmed Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
title_sort Food intake reported versus nursing records : is there agreement in surgical patients?
author Azambuja, Fernanda Braga
author_facet Azambuja, Fernanda Braga
Beghetto, Mariur Gomes
Assis, Michelli Cristina Silva de
Mello, Elza Daniel de
author_role author
author2 Beghetto, Mariur Gomes
Assis, Michelli Cristina Silva de
Mello, Elza Daniel de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azambuja, Fernanda Braga
Beghetto, Mariur Gomes
Assis, Michelli Cristina Silva de
Mello, Elza Daniel de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ingestão de alimentos
Registros de enfermagem
Hospitalização
topic Ingestão de alimentos
Registros de enfermagem
Hospitalização
Food Intake
Nursing Records
Hospitalization
Ingestión de Alimentos
Registros de Enfermería
Hospitalización
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Food Intake
Nursing Records
Hospitalization
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Ingestión de Alimentos
Registros de Enfermería
Hospitalización
description Objectives: to evaluate the agreement between oral feeding by patients and chart records of this acceptance. Method: Besides the food intake surveys of surgical patients, the nursing records of nutrition were evaluated. Is was considered good oral feeding: intake ≥ 75% of total calories prescribed at the day; medium acceptance: 50 to 74.9%; low acceptance: < 50% and NPO (nothing per oral). The Kappa coefficient was adopted to assess agreement. Results: there were similar answers between patient and nursing records in 91.3% of NPO situations, 87.1% for good oral feeding, 17.8% for medium acceptance and 16.5% for low acceptance (Kappa = 0.45). Conclusion: agreement between patient’s reports and nursing records was moderate to low. A higher proportion of similar answers were observed when the patients related good oral feeding or NPO.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-11-19T02:39:30Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129895
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0212-1611
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000969965
identifier_str_mv 0212-1611
000969965
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129895
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Nutricion hospitalaria. Madrid. Vol. 31, no. 6 (2015), p. 2735-2739
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/1/000969965.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/2/000969965.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129895/3/000969965.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6fa40c83a2c104a020f50ed6530f9fb7
9db743a47c9879d9dc976c66e1c5546f
4fd3b9e5eb7b666bd656e5ae6c0303e4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224890861223936

Registros relacionados