Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/172619 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis. Twenty-six patients with articular disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR) were included in the study and assigned to two groups ( = 13): single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the TMJ (1N) and conventional two-needle arthrocentesis (2N). The maximum interincisal distance (MID) and TMJ pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) were compared. MID and VAS data were obtained: before (T1), seven days after (T2), fifteen days after (T3), one month after (T4), three months after (T5), six months after (T6), nine months after (T7), and one year after the arthrocentesis procedures (T8). Considering each group individually, results of the VAS scores and MID measurements showed a significant difference between T1 and T2–T8 ( < 0.001) in both groups. Between two groups, results show no significant differences ( > 0.05). Both techniques tested were effective in reducing pain and increasing MID. Due to the advantages over the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis, single-needle arthrocentesiswith distension of the upper compartment should be considered as the first treatment option for patients with painful hypomobilized TMJ of DDWOR. |
id |
UFRGS-2_dc674bae3c91fdb5dfdc98cd7fa230f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/172619 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Grossmann, EduardoPasqual, Primo GuilhermePoluha, Rodrigo LorenziIwaki, Lilian Cristina VessoniIwaki Filho, LiogiSetogutti, Ênio Tadashi2018-02-20T02:25:24Z20171203-6765http://hdl.handle.net/10183/172619001059586The objective of this study was to compare single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis. Twenty-six patients with articular disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR) were included in the study and assigned to two groups ( = 13): single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the TMJ (1N) and conventional two-needle arthrocentesis (2N). The maximum interincisal distance (MID) and TMJ pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) were compared. MID and VAS data were obtained: before (T1), seven days after (T2), fifteen days after (T3), one month after (T4), three months after (T5), six months after (T6), nine months after (T7), and one year after the arthrocentesis procedures (T8). Considering each group individually, results of the VAS scores and MID measurements showed a significant difference between T1 and T2–T8 ( < 0.001) in both groups. Between two groups, results show no significant differences ( > 0.05). Both techniques tested were effective in reducing pain and increasing MID. Due to the advantages over the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis, single-needle arthrocentesiswith distension of the upper compartment should be considered as the first treatment option for patients with painful hypomobilized TMJ of DDWOR.application/pdfengPain research and management. New York, NY. Vol. 2017 (2017), article ID2435263, 5 p.ArtrocenteseArticulação temporomandibularDor facialSingle-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trialEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001059586.pdf001059586.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1373314http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/1/001059586.pdf9fd8a32753499df453a1f63282a3c37dMD51TEXT001059586.pdf.txt001059586.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain27028http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/2/001059586.pdf.txt1ba5efd4dac2fb6afd71de0c1baeabd5MD52THUMBNAIL001059586.pdf.jpg001059586.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1911http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/3/001059586.pdf.jpg074fc0f3e7f26d3bb954f0913e991af1MD5310183/1726192019-02-02 02:31:29.729269oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/172619Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-02-02T04:31:29Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
title |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial Grossmann, Eduardo Artrocentese Articulação temporomandibular Dor facial |
title_short |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Single-needle arthrocentesis with upper compartment distension versus conventional two-needle arthrocentesis : randomized clinical trial |
author |
Grossmann, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Grossmann, Eduardo Pasqual, Primo Guilherme Poluha, Rodrigo Lorenzi Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki Filho, Liogi Setogutti, Ênio Tadashi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pasqual, Primo Guilherme Poluha, Rodrigo Lorenzi Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki Filho, Liogi Setogutti, Ênio Tadashi |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grossmann, Eduardo Pasqual, Primo Guilherme Poluha, Rodrigo Lorenzi Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki Filho, Liogi Setogutti, Ênio Tadashi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Artrocentese Articulação temporomandibular Dor facial |
topic |
Artrocentese Articulação temporomandibular Dor facial |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis. Twenty-six patients with articular disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR) were included in the study and assigned to two groups ( = 13): single-needle arthrocentesis with distension of the upper compartment of the TMJ (1N) and conventional two-needle arthrocentesis (2N). The maximum interincisal distance (MID) and TMJ pain as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) were compared. MID and VAS data were obtained: before (T1), seven days after (T2), fifteen days after (T3), one month after (T4), three months after (T5), six months after (T6), nine months after (T7), and one year after the arthrocentesis procedures (T8). Considering each group individually, results of the VAS scores and MID measurements showed a significant difference between T1 and T2–T8 ( < 0.001) in both groups. Between two groups, results show no significant differences ( > 0.05). Both techniques tested were effective in reducing pain and increasing MID. Due to the advantages over the conventional two-needle arthrocentesis, single-needle arthrocentesiswith distension of the upper compartment should be considered as the first treatment option for patients with painful hypomobilized TMJ of DDWOR. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-20T02:25:24Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/172619 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1203-6765 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001059586 |
identifier_str_mv |
1203-6765 001059586 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/172619 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Pain research and management. New York, NY. Vol. 2017 (2017), article ID2435263, 5 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/1/001059586.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/2/001059586.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/172619/3/001059586.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
9fd8a32753499df453a1f63282a3c37d 1ba5efd4dac2fb6afd71de0c1baeabd5 074fc0f3e7f26d3bb954f0913e991af1 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224936695529472 |