Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404 |
Resumo: | Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients. |
id |
UFRGS-2_e3582e8e5002b07634d1207a9bacbf43 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150404 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Leitão, Cristiane BauermannGrillo, Maria de Fátima FerreiraRocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da CostaBrenner, Juliana KellerFriedman, RogérioGross, Jorge Luiz2017-01-04T02:26:46Z20121758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404000874522Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients.application/pdfengDiabetology and metabolic syndrome. [London]. Vol. 4, no. 1 (Nov. 2012), 47, [5] f.American Diabetes AssociationDiabetes mellitus tipo 2Guias de prática clínica como assuntoType 2 diabetesADA guidelinesReal lifeAre diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000874522.pdf000874522.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf346693http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/1/000874522.pdff54f499fe2ee631abbb69ffe18416ec8MD51TEXT000874522.pdf.txt000874522.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain21599http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/2/000874522.pdf.txt0a55e1f02acf3b6e5d2b237d4e0283beMD52THUMBNAIL000874522.pdf.jpg000874522.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1928http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/3/000874522.pdf.jpg50903f6046e30cd6f9a7d2a253fee887MD5310183/1504042018-10-30 08:05:41.457oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150404Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2018-10-30T11:05:41Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
title |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
spellingShingle |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann American Diabetes Association Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Guias de prática clínica como assunto Type 2 diabetes ADA guidelines Real life |
title_short |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
title_full |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
title_fullStr |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
title_sort |
Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’? |
author |
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann |
author_facet |
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa Brenner, Juliana Keller Friedman, Rogério Gross, Jorge Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa Brenner, Juliana Keller Friedman, Rogério Gross, Jorge Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa Brenner, Juliana Keller Friedman, Rogério Gross, Jorge Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
American Diabetes Association Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Guias de prática clínica como assunto |
topic |
American Diabetes Association Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Guias de prática clínica como assunto Type 2 diabetes ADA guidelines Real life |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Type 2 diabetes ADA guidelines Real life |
description |
Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-04T02:26:46Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1758-5996 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000874522 |
identifier_str_mv |
1758-5996 000874522 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Diabetology and metabolic syndrome. [London]. Vol. 4, no. 1 (Nov. 2012), 47, [5] f. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/1/000874522.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/2/000874522.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/3/000874522.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f54f499fe2ee631abbb69ffe18416ec8 0a55e1f02acf3b6e5d2b237d4e0283be 50903f6046e30cd6f9a7d2a253fee887 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1817724993759346688 |