Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira, Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa, Brenner, Juliana Keller, Friedman, Rogério, Gross, Jorge Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404
Resumo: Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients.
id UFRGS-2_e3582e8e5002b07634d1207a9bacbf43
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150404
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Leitão, Cristiane BauermannGrillo, Maria de Fátima FerreiraRocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da CostaBrenner, Juliana KellerFriedman, RogérioGross, Jorge Luiz2017-01-04T02:26:46Z20121758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404000874522Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients.application/pdfengDiabetology and metabolic syndrome. [London]. Vol. 4, no. 1 (Nov. 2012), 47, [5] f.American Diabetes AssociationDiabetes mellitus tipo 2Guias de prática clínica como assuntoType 2 diabetesADA guidelinesReal lifeAre diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000874522.pdf000874522.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf346693http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/1/000874522.pdff54f499fe2ee631abbb69ffe18416ec8MD51TEXT000874522.pdf.txt000874522.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain21599http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/2/000874522.pdf.txt0a55e1f02acf3b6e5d2b237d4e0283beMD52THUMBNAIL000874522.pdf.jpg000874522.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1928http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/3/000874522.pdf.jpg50903f6046e30cd6f9a7d2a253fee887MD5310183/1504042018-10-30 08:05:41.457oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150404Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2018-10-30T11:05:41Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
title Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
spellingShingle Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
American Diabetes Association
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Guias de prática clínica como assunto
Type 2 diabetes
ADA guidelines
Real life
title_short Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
title_full Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
title_fullStr Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
title_full_unstemmed Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
title_sort Are diabetes management guidelines applicable in ‘real life’?
author Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
author_facet Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira
Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa
Brenner, Juliana Keller
Friedman, Rogério
Gross, Jorge Luiz
author_role author
author2 Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira
Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa
Brenner, Juliana Keller
Friedman, Rogério
Gross, Jorge Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Grillo, Maria de Fátima Ferreira
Rocha, Ennio Paulo Calearo da Costa
Brenner, Juliana Keller
Friedman, Rogério
Gross, Jorge Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv American Diabetes Association
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Guias de prática clínica como assunto
topic American Diabetes Association
Diabetes mellitus tipo 2
Guias de prática clínica como assunto
Type 2 diabetes
ADA guidelines
Real life
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Type 2 diabetes
ADA guidelines
Real life
description Background: The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has published several diabetes treatment algorithms, but none have been tested in real-life settings. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility of achieving and/or maintaining HbA1c levels <7.0% using current diabetes treatment guidelines and the resources available in the public health care system of Brazil. Methods: A one-year, single-arm interventional study was conducted with type 2 diabetes patients in a primary care unit. Intervention consisted of intensification of lifestyle changes and sequential prescription of drugs based on ADA guidelines using the medications available through the publicly funded Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). Results: Ninety patients (age: 62.7±10.4 years; diabetes duration: 8.2±9.1 years) completed the trial. During the intervention period, increases were observed in number of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) classes per patient (1.50±0.74 vs. 1.67±0.7; p=0.015), OAD pills per patient (2.64±1.89 vs. 3.33±2.23 pills/patient; p <0.001), insulin dosage (0.20±0.29 vs.0.50±0.36 UI/kg/day; p=0.008) and number of patients on insulin (19 [21%] vs. 31 [34%]; p<0.01), but no improvement in HbA1c (7.2±1.6% vs. 7.3±1.5%; p=0.453) or frequency of patients on target, defined as HbA1c <7% (53.3% vs. 48.9%; p=0.655). Patients with baseline HbA1c <7% had a small increase in HbA1c during the trial (6.3±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.9%; p=0.002). No such change was observed in those with baseline HbA1c ≥7%. Conclusions: In this group of patients with a mean baseline HbA1c of 7.2%, implementation of 2006/2009 ADA/EASD guidelines led to achievement of the therapeutic goal of HbA1c <7% in a small proportion of patients.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-01-04T02:26:46Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1758-5996
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000874522
identifier_str_mv 1758-5996
000874522
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150404
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Diabetology and metabolic syndrome. [London]. Vol. 4, no. 1 (Nov. 2012), 47, [5] f.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/1/000874522.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/2/000874522.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150404/3/000874522.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f54f499fe2ee631abbb69ffe18416ec8
0a55e1f02acf3b6e5d2b237d4e0283be
50903f6046e30cd6f9a7d2a253fee887
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1817724993759346688