Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/196277 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the labeling preferences of medication users and characterize their perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of medication users aged 18 years or older in 10 Brazilian capital cities. Perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels in relation to sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated by Poisson regression models with robust variance. Labeling preferences were assessed through questions addressing possible improvements and through the use of digitally simulated packages. Results Of 6,255 medication users interviewed, more than half found it difficult or very difficult to read (50.8%) and/or understand (52.0%) medication labels. Difficulties were more pronounced for participants aged 40 years or older, with lower levels of education, and nonwhites. Increasing the font size (93.7%), describing the indications for use (95.9%) and contraindications (95.6%) on the label, and highlighting the expiration date (96.3%) were the most widely accepted improvements. In the evaluation of simulated packages, users preferred factors that improved readability, such as increased font size, use of graphic elements and color to highlight the concentration of the active ingredient, and contrast between the font color and background. The new simulated package design, with increased font size, color to highlight the concentration and contrast between the font color and background, was preferred over the standard design by 77.0% of participants. Conclusion: Based on users’ perceptions, increased font size and use of graphic elements and color to emphasize critical information, such as expiration date and concentration, are factors that contribute to making medication labels clearer to users. Pharmaceutical industries and policy makers should consider these items when developing labels and defining policies on this issue. |
id |
UFRGS-2_eaba25ecab516cd39bc1a8631ee2eba6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/196277 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pons, Emilia da SilvaPagano, Cassia Garcia MoraesFalavigna, MaiconSirtori, Lisana RegininiCruz, Fernanda daWebster, Guilherme CozerDal Pizzol, Tatiane da Silva2019-06-26T02:34:56Z20191932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/196277001089977Objective: To evaluate the labeling preferences of medication users and characterize their perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of medication users aged 18 years or older in 10 Brazilian capital cities. Perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels in relation to sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated by Poisson regression models with robust variance. Labeling preferences were assessed through questions addressing possible improvements and through the use of digitally simulated packages. Results Of 6,255 medication users interviewed, more than half found it difficult or very difficult to read (50.8%) and/or understand (52.0%) medication labels. Difficulties were more pronounced for participants aged 40 years or older, with lower levels of education, and nonwhites. Increasing the font size (93.7%), describing the indications for use (95.9%) and contraindications (95.6%) on the label, and highlighting the expiration date (96.3%) were the most widely accepted improvements. In the evaluation of simulated packages, users preferred factors that improved readability, such as increased font size, use of graphic elements and color to highlight the concentration of the active ingredient, and contrast between the font color and background. The new simulated package design, with increased font size, color to highlight the concentration and contrast between the font color and background, was preferred over the standard design by 77.0% of participants. Conclusion: Based on users’ perceptions, increased font size and use of graphic elements and color to emphasize critical information, such as expiration date and concentration, are factors that contribute to making medication labels clearer to users. Pharmaceutical industries and policy makers should consider these items when developing labels and defining policies on this issue.application/pdfengPLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 14, no. 2 (Feb. 2019), e0212173, 15 f.Assistência farmacêuticaRotulagem de medicamentosUsers' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labelsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001089977.pdf.txt001089977.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain47391http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/196277/2/001089977.pdf.txt8934b655eb528bc8925b8fdd702783b6MD52ORIGINAL001089977.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1488636http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/196277/1/001089977.pdf4b4ddcf5e2d3f78237c160f61b1f398cMD5110183/1962772019-06-27 02:36:14.02076oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/196277Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-06-27T05:36:14Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
title |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
spellingShingle |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels Pons, Emilia da Silva Assistência farmacêutica Rotulagem de medicamentos |
title_short |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
title_full |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
title_fullStr |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
title_sort |
Users' preferences and perceptions of thecomprehensibility and readability of medication labels |
author |
Pons, Emilia da Silva |
author_facet |
Pons, Emilia da Silva Pagano, Cassia Garcia Moraes Falavigna, Maicon Sirtori, Lisana Reginini Cruz, Fernanda da Webster, Guilherme Cozer Dal Pizzol, Tatiane da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pagano, Cassia Garcia Moraes Falavigna, Maicon Sirtori, Lisana Reginini Cruz, Fernanda da Webster, Guilherme Cozer Dal Pizzol, Tatiane da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pons, Emilia da Silva Pagano, Cassia Garcia Moraes Falavigna, Maicon Sirtori, Lisana Reginini Cruz, Fernanda da Webster, Guilherme Cozer Dal Pizzol, Tatiane da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assistência farmacêutica Rotulagem de medicamentos |
topic |
Assistência farmacêutica Rotulagem de medicamentos |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the labeling preferences of medication users and characterize their perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of medication users aged 18 years or older in 10 Brazilian capital cities. Perceptions of the comprehensibility and readability of medication labels in relation to sociodemographic characteristics were evaluated by Poisson regression models with robust variance. Labeling preferences were assessed through questions addressing possible improvements and through the use of digitally simulated packages. Results Of 6,255 medication users interviewed, more than half found it difficult or very difficult to read (50.8%) and/or understand (52.0%) medication labels. Difficulties were more pronounced for participants aged 40 years or older, with lower levels of education, and nonwhites. Increasing the font size (93.7%), describing the indications for use (95.9%) and contraindications (95.6%) on the label, and highlighting the expiration date (96.3%) were the most widely accepted improvements. In the evaluation of simulated packages, users preferred factors that improved readability, such as increased font size, use of graphic elements and color to highlight the concentration of the active ingredient, and contrast between the font color and background. The new simulated package design, with increased font size, color to highlight the concentration and contrast between the font color and background, was preferred over the standard design by 77.0% of participants. Conclusion: Based on users’ perceptions, increased font size and use of graphic elements and color to emphasize critical information, such as expiration date and concentration, are factors that contribute to making medication labels clearer to users. Pharmaceutical industries and policy makers should consider these items when developing labels and defining policies on this issue. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-26T02:34:56Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/196277 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001089977 |
identifier_str_mv |
1932-6203 001089977 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/196277 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
PLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 14, no. 2 (Feb. 2019), e0212173, 15 f. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/196277/2/001089977.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/196277/1/001089977.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8934b655eb528bc8925b8fdd702783b6 4b4ddcf5e2d3f78237c160f61b1f398c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447689522839552 |