Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miller-Perrin,Cindy
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Perrin,Robin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722018000106301
Resumo: Abstract Physical punishment remains a common practice in the USA despite significant empirical evidence of its potential harm and ineffectiveness, arguments that its use violates children’s human rights, and professional recommendations against its use. The purpose of the current paper is to offer explanations as to why, in the face of a worldwide movement to protect children from violence, the USA continues to support physical punishment of children. The paper also summarizes the various debates engaged in by experts that stem from these explanations for physical punishment and argue that the time has come to move beyond these debates and eliminate the physical punishment of children. We offer suggestions for changing attitudes and practices related to physical punishment of children in order to promote their health and well-being. We conclude by suggesting that the burden of proof in debates about physical punishment, which has typically fallen upon those who argue children should never be physically punished, should shift to those who continue to promote its use despite evidence of its harm and ineffectiveness.
id UFRGS-5_cf274ff732088de268be8da450ecf2fb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-79722018000106301
network_acronym_str UFRGS-5
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-beingPhysical punishmentSpankingCultural normsHuman rightsAbstract Physical punishment remains a common practice in the USA despite significant empirical evidence of its potential harm and ineffectiveness, arguments that its use violates children’s human rights, and professional recommendations against its use. The purpose of the current paper is to offer explanations as to why, in the face of a worldwide movement to protect children from violence, the USA continues to support physical punishment of children. The paper also summarizes the various debates engaged in by experts that stem from these explanations for physical punishment and argue that the time has come to move beyond these debates and eliminate the physical punishment of children. We offer suggestions for changing attitudes and practices related to physical punishment of children in order to promote their health and well-being. We conclude by suggesting that the burden of proof in debates about physical punishment, which has typically fallen upon those who argue children should never be physically punished, should shift to those who continue to promote its use despite evidence of its harm and ineffectiveness.Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722018000106301Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.31 2018reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGS10.1186/s41155-018-0096-xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiller-Perrin,CindyPerrin,Robineng2018-08-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-79722018000106301Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prc/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpprc@springeropen.com1678-71530102-7972opendoar:2018-08-02T00:00Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
title Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
spellingShingle Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
Miller-Perrin,Cindy
Physical punishment
Spanking
Cultural norms
Human rights
title_short Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
title_full Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
title_fullStr Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
title_full_unstemmed Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
title_sort Physical punishment of children by US parents: moving beyond debate to promote children’s health and well-being
author Miller-Perrin,Cindy
author_facet Miller-Perrin,Cindy
Perrin,Robin
author_role author
author2 Perrin,Robin
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miller-Perrin,Cindy
Perrin,Robin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physical punishment
Spanking
Cultural norms
Human rights
topic Physical punishment
Spanking
Cultural norms
Human rights
description Abstract Physical punishment remains a common practice in the USA despite significant empirical evidence of its potential harm and ineffectiveness, arguments that its use violates children’s human rights, and professional recommendations against its use. The purpose of the current paper is to offer explanations as to why, in the face of a worldwide movement to protect children from violence, the USA continues to support physical punishment of children. The paper also summarizes the various debates engaged in by experts that stem from these explanations for physical punishment and argue that the time has come to move beyond these debates and eliminate the physical punishment of children. We offer suggestions for changing attitudes and practices related to physical punishment of children in order to promote their health and well-being. We conclude by suggesting that the burden of proof in debates about physical punishment, which has typically fallen upon those who argue children should never be physically punished, should shift to those who continue to promote its use despite evidence of its harm and ineffectiveness.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722018000106301
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722018000106301
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/s41155-018-0096-x
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.31 2018
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv prc@springeropen.com
_version_ 1750134866687557632