Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves,Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lencina,Marcus Vinicius de Souza, Paes,Mayara Juliana, Stefanello,Joice Mara Facco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722021000100406
Resumo: Abstract Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.
id UFRGS-5_dc10bee160985376fdf9337a43f1d3da
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-79722021000100406
network_acronym_str UFRGS-5
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic reviewCollective efficacyGroup dynamicsPsychometric instrumentMeasurementAbstract Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722021000100406Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.34 2021reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGS10.1186/s41155-021-00183-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves,Mylena Aparecida RodriguesLencina,Marcus Vinicius de SouzaPaes,Mayara JulianaStefanello,Joice Mara Faccoeng2021-09-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-79722021000100406Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prc/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpprc@springeropen.com1678-71530102-7972opendoar:2021-09-08T00:00Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
spellingShingle Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
Alves,Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
Collective efficacy
Group dynamics
Psychometric instrument
Measurement
title_short Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_full Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_fullStr Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
title_sort Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review
author Alves,Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
author_facet Alves,Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
Lencina,Marcus Vinicius de Souza
Paes,Mayara Juliana
Stefanello,Joice Mara Facco
author_role author
author2 Lencina,Marcus Vinicius de Souza
Paes,Mayara Juliana
Stefanello,Joice Mara Facco
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves,Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues
Lencina,Marcus Vinicius de Souza
Paes,Mayara Juliana
Stefanello,Joice Mara Facco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Collective efficacy
Group dynamics
Psychometric instrument
Measurement
topic Collective efficacy
Group dynamics
Psychometric instrument
Measurement
description Abstract Collective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722021000100406
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722021000100406
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.34 2021
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv prc@springeropen.com
_version_ 1750134867140542464