Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Pedroso Neto, Antônio José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/126456
Resumo: This article investigates how similar and how different the electoral courts are regarding the use of Twitter as a public communication tool. It analyzes the 28 profiles of electoral courts on Twitter and 2,047 tweets published in two weeks of 2020. Two methods are used: content analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. Tweets are classified into four types (Tweet; Retweet; Mention; and Reply) and six thematic categories (Dialogue; Public interest; Decisions, news and news check; Court sessions, events and commemorative dates; Institutional and personal promotion; and Others). The main result is the differences and similarities of the public communication strategies adopted by the bodies, a result that is based on a relational principle between the quantity of publications and the quality of public communication carried out on Twitter.
id UFRGS-6_1b1044cbce5f69de38d94705d4a9d70e
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/126456
network_acronym_str UFRGS-6
network_name_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on TwitterQuantidade é qualidade na comunicação pública: uma análise do espaço social dos tribunais eleitorais no TwitterPublic communicationTwitterElectoral justiceContent analysisMultiple correspondence analysisComunicação públicaTwitterJustiça eleitoralAnálise de conteúdoAnálise de correspondências múltiplasThis article investigates how similar and how different the electoral courts are regarding the use of Twitter as a public communication tool. It analyzes the 28 profiles of electoral courts on Twitter and 2,047 tweets published in two weeks of 2020. Two methods are used: content analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. Tweets are classified into four types (Tweet; Retweet; Mention; and Reply) and six thematic categories (Dialogue; Public interest; Decisions, news and news check; Court sessions, events and commemorative dates; Institutional and personal promotion; and Others). The main result is the differences and similarities of the public communication strategies adopted by the bodies, a result that is based on a relational principle between the quantity of publications and the quality of public communication carried out on Twitter.Este artigo investiga quão similares ou quão diferentes são os tribunais eleitorais com relação ao uso do Twitter como ferramenta de comunicação pública. Analisa os 28 perfis dos tribunais eleitorais no Twitter e 2.047 tweets publicados em duas semanas de 2020. São utilizados dois métodos: a análise de conteúdo e a análise de correspondências múltiplas. Os tweets são classificados em quatro tipos (Tweet; Retweet; Menção; e Resposta) e seis categorias temáticas (Diálogo; Interesse público; Decisões, notícias e checagens; Sessões, eventos e datas comemorativas; Promoção institucional e pessoal; e Outros). Como principal resultado, tem-se as diferenças e similaridades das estratégias de comunicação pública adotadas pelos órgãos, resultado que se fundamenta em um princípio relacional entre quantidade de publicações e qualidade da comunicação pública exercida no Twitter.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2022-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/12645610.19132/1807-8583202253.126456Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 126456Intexto; Núm. 53 (2022); 126456Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 126456Intexto; N. 53 (2022); 126456Intexto; n. 53 (2022); 1264561807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/126456/87077Copyright (c) 2022 Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da Silva, Antônio José Pedroso Netohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann daPedroso Neto, Antônio José2023-10-11T14:33:26Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/126456Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-10-11T14:33:26Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
Quantidade é qualidade na comunicação pública: uma análise do espaço social dos tribunais eleitorais no Twitter
title Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
spellingShingle Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
Silva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da
Public communication
Twitter
Electoral justice
Content analysis
Multiple correspondence analysis
Comunicação pública
Twitter
Justiça eleitoral
Análise de conteúdo
Análise de correspondências múltiplas
title_short Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
title_full Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
title_fullStr Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
title_sort Quantity is quality in public communication: an analysis of the social space of electoral courts on Twitter
author Silva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da
author_facet Silva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da
Pedroso Neto, Antônio José
author_role author
author2 Pedroso Neto, Antônio José
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da
Pedroso Neto, Antônio José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Public communication
Twitter
Electoral justice
Content analysis
Multiple correspondence analysis
Comunicação pública
Twitter
Justiça eleitoral
Análise de conteúdo
Análise de correspondências múltiplas
topic Public communication
Twitter
Electoral justice
Content analysis
Multiple correspondence analysis
Comunicação pública
Twitter
Justiça eleitoral
Análise de conteúdo
Análise de correspondências múltiplas
description This article investigates how similar and how different the electoral courts are regarding the use of Twitter as a public communication tool. It analyzes the 28 profiles of electoral courts on Twitter and 2,047 tweets published in two weeks of 2020. Two methods are used: content analysis and multiple correspondence analysis. Tweets are classified into four types (Tweet; Retweet; Mention; and Reply) and six thematic categories (Dialogue; Public interest; Decisions, news and news check; Court sessions, events and commemorative dates; Institutional and personal promotion; and Others). The main result is the differences and similarities of the public communication strategies adopted by the bodies, a result that is based on a relational principle between the quantity of publications and the quality of public communication carried out on Twitter.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/126456
10.19132/1807-8583202253.126456
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/126456
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1807-8583202253.126456
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/126456/87077
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da Silva, Antônio José Pedroso Neto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Maurílio Luiz Hoffmann da Silva, Antônio José Pedroso Neto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 126456
Intexto; Núm. 53 (2022); 126456
Intexto; No. 53 (2022); 126456
Intexto; N. 53 (2022); 126456
Intexto; n. 53 (2022); 126456
1807-8583
reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
collection Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||intexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766111513739264

Registros relacionados