For dissenting communication in face of organizational bullying

• Autor(a) principal: Andrade Scroferneker, Cleusa Maria
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Gomes, Luciana Buksztejn, Falavigna, Francielle Benett, Moraes, Fernanda Luz
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
• Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102850
• topic: Comunicação organizacional; Assédio moral; Assédio moral organizacional; Organizational communication; Moral harassment; organizational bullying

Moral harassment and organizational moral harassment are topics that, although not recent, have been deserving some space for discussion. In 2018, this was one of the themes we addressed when the IV SICO-International Seminar on Organizational Communication was held. On this occasion, we seek to clarify the distinction between these two forms of harassment, highlighting their most forceful and expressive practices, but also their nefarious side, which has perhaps its most perverse side in silencing, making the other an invisible being. We consider the results of the survey released by the Planning Group of São Paulo and resort to decisions contained in judgments - public documents arising from decisions rendered by the Courts to reflect on dissident communication in organizational environments in the face of moral harassment and organizational moral harassment. One of our concerns is the (im)possibility of employees/employees to express themselves [and/or try to express themselves] to express a contrary position – notably understood by management as a confrontation.