A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buchinger, Diego
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Hounsell, Marcelo da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Informática na Educação: teoria & prática
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/49126
Resumo: Dengue fever is a major infectious disease caused by arbovirus and there is no vaccine yet; prevention is the action which raises the importance of an educational approach. The use of games to help in the educational process can be motivating and effective but it is not clear which interaction approach is the best: individual or collaborative. A comparative study on a between subject (n=73) experiment using a single player and a pair based version of a serious game that teaches about Dengue fever has been performed. Both versions performed well but presented different advantages: single player version can be used for consulting more easily, and the pair-based game seems to be slightly more motivating to the point that players would be more willing to suggest it to someone else. Data suggest that each interaction approach has its role in the educational process and should be carefully evaluated against educator’s intents.
id UFRGS-7_fa63cdab315553d81460d33cf6a13e16
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49126
network_acronym_str UFRGS-7
network_name_str Informática na Educação: teoria & prática
repository_id_str
spelling A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue FeverDengue feverSerious gamesEducationCollaborative learning.Comparison between an individual and a collaborative Serious Game about Dengue FeverDengue fever is a major infectious disease caused by arbovirus and there is no vaccine yet; prevention is the action which raises the importance of an educational approach. The use of games to help in the educational process can be motivating and effective but it is not clear which interaction approach is the best: individual or collaborative. A comparative study on a between subject (n=73) experiment using a single player and a pair based version of a serious game that teaches about Dengue fever has been performed. Both versions performed well but presented different advantages: single player version can be used for consulting more easily, and the pair-based game seems to be slightly more motivating to the point that players would be more willing to suggest it to someone else. Data suggest that each interaction approach has its role in the educational process and should be carefully evaluated against educator’s intents.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2015-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionComparative Studyapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/4912610.22456/1982-1654.49126Computers in education: theory & practice; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2015): EDUCAÇÃO, INCLUSÃO E AMBIENTE VIRTUAL DE APRENDIZAGEMInformática na educação: teoria & prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2015): EDUCAÇÃO, INCLUSÃO E AMBIENTE VIRTUAL DE APRENDIZAGEM1982-16541516-084Xreponame:Informática na Educação: teoria & práticainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/49126/34473Buchinger, DiegoHounsell, Marcelo da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-07-29T20:38:34Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49126Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/InfEducTeoriaPraticaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/InfEducTeoriaPratica/oai||revista@pgie.ufrgs.br1982-16541516-084Xopendoar:2015-07-29T20:38:34Informática na Educação: teoria & prática - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
title A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
spellingShingle A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
Buchinger, Diego
Dengue fever
Serious games
Education
Collaborative learning.
Comparison between an individual and a collaborative Serious Game about Dengue Fever
title_short A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
title_full A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
title_fullStr A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
title_sort A Comparison Between an Individual and a Collaborative Versions of a Serious Game to Learn About Dengue Fever
author Buchinger, Diego
author_facet Buchinger, Diego
Hounsell, Marcelo da Silva
author_role author
author2 Hounsell, Marcelo da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buchinger, Diego
Hounsell, Marcelo da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dengue fever
Serious games
Education
Collaborative learning.
Comparison between an individual and a collaborative Serious Game about Dengue Fever
topic Dengue fever
Serious games
Education
Collaborative learning.
Comparison between an individual and a collaborative Serious Game about Dengue Fever
description Dengue fever is a major infectious disease caused by arbovirus and there is no vaccine yet; prevention is the action which raises the importance of an educational approach. The use of games to help in the educational process can be motivating and effective but it is not clear which interaction approach is the best: individual or collaborative. A comparative study on a between subject (n=73) experiment using a single player and a pair based version of a serious game that teaches about Dengue fever has been performed. Both versions performed well but presented different advantages: single player version can be used for consulting more easily, and the pair-based game seems to be slightly more motivating to the point that players would be more willing to suggest it to someone else. Data suggest that each interaction approach has its role in the educational process and should be carefully evaluated against educator’s intents.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Comparative Study
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/49126
10.22456/1982-1654.49126
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/49126
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-1654.49126
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/InfEducTeoriaPratica/article/view/49126/34473
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Computers in education: theory & practice; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2015): EDUCAÇÃO, INCLUSÃO E AMBIENTE VIRTUAL DE APRENDIZAGEM
Informática na educação: teoria & prática; v. 18 n. 1 (2015): EDUCAÇÃO, INCLUSÃO E AMBIENTE VIRTUAL DE APRENDIZAGEM
1982-1654
1516-084X
reponame:Informática na Educação: teoria & prática
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Informática na Educação: teoria & prática
collection Informática na Educação: teoria & prática
repository.name.fl_str_mv Informática na Educação: teoria & prática - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@pgie.ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766183112605696