Anomie of researchers in data sharing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Em Questão (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122627 |
Resumo: | Data sharing is standard practice in some disciplines, while in others it is particularly critical, depending on factors such as individual researchers’ behavior or disciplinary culture. Anomie in data sharing can occur when the sets of cultural values that govern the researcher’ conduct and institutional goals are out of balance, with cultural values or vested interests having greater relevance than institutional goals. Thus, individuals perceive themselves in disagreement with what institutions require and practice deviant behaviors, with possible data retention . The objective was to identify and discuss factors that can establish a state of anomie in researchers in the data sharing process, presenting a framework with the identified factors. The collection occurred through triangulation with the application of a questionnaire, a structured interview, and document analysis. With the documentary analysis, a framework with thirteen indexes was presented, based on the theoretical frameworks, W. Richard Scott's Institutional Theory, Icek Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, and Youngseek Kim's proposed data repository sharing behavior research model. It is concluded that anomie is related to factors such as lack of clarity of laws and regulations, imbalance between institutional goals and the ways to achieve them, non-compliance with rules, and denial of morals. |
id |
UFRGS-8_00d4d9b3868d5e381f5df5c881848ec4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/122627 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-8 |
network_name_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anomie of researchers in data sharingAnomia de pesquisadores no compartilhamento de dadosanomiacompartilhamento de dados dados de pesquisaanomiedata sharingresearch dataData sharing is standard practice in some disciplines, while in others it is particularly critical, depending on factors such as individual researchers’ behavior or disciplinary culture. Anomie in data sharing can occur when the sets of cultural values that govern the researcher’ conduct and institutional goals are out of balance, with cultural values or vested interests having greater relevance than institutional goals. Thus, individuals perceive themselves in disagreement with what institutions require and practice deviant behaviors, with possible data retention . The objective was to identify and discuss factors that can establish a state of anomie in researchers in the data sharing process, presenting a framework with the identified factors. The collection occurred through triangulation with the application of a questionnaire, a structured interview, and document analysis. With the documentary analysis, a framework with thirteen indexes was presented, based on the theoretical frameworks, W. Richard Scott's Institutional Theory, Icek Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, and Youngseek Kim's proposed data repository sharing behavior research model. It is concluded that anomie is related to factors such as lack of clarity of laws and regulations, imbalance between institutional goals and the ways to achieve them, non-compliance with rules, and denial of morals.O compartilhamento de dados é prática corrente em algumas disciplinas, enquanto em outras é particularmente crítico, dependendo de fatores como comportamento individual dos pesquisadores ou da cultura disciplinar. A anomia no compartilhamento dos dados pode ocorrer quando os conjuntos de valores culturais que governam a conduta dos pesquisadores e as metas institucionais encontram-se em desequilíbrio, pendendo para uma maior relevância dos valores culturais ou interesses particulares em relação às metas institucionais. Assim, os indivíduos percebem-se em desconformidade com que as instituições requerem e praticam condutas desviantes, ocorrendo uma possível retenção dos dados. O objetivo foi identificar e discutir fatores que podem instaurar um estado de anomia em pesquisadores no processo de compartilhamento de dados apresentando um framework com os fatores identificados. A coleta ocorreu por meio da triangulação com a aplicação de questionário, entrevista estruturada e análise documental. Com a análise documental foi apresentado um framework com treze índices, baseado nas estruturas teóricas, Teoria Institucional de W. Richard Scott, na Teoria do Comportamento Planejado de Icek Ajzen e no modelo de pesquisa de comportamento de compartilhamento de dados em repositório de dados proposto de Youngseek Kim. Conclui-se que a anomia está relacionada a fatores como falta de clareza das leis e normativas, desequilíbrio entre metas institucionais e os caminhos para atingi-las, descumprimento de regras e negação da moral.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2022-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/12262710.19132/1808-5245.29.122627Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122627Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122627Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 1226271808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122627/87765Copyright (c) 2022 Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar Monteiro, Ricardo César Gonçalves Sant'Anahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de AguiarSant'Ana, Ricardo César Gonçalves2023-12-07T14:06:55Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/122627Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2023-12-07T14:06:55Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing Anomia de pesquisadores no compartilhamento de dados |
title |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
spellingShingle |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing Monteiro, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar anomia compartilhamento de dados dados de pesquisa anomie data sharing research data |
title_short |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
title_full |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
title_fullStr |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
title_sort |
Anomie of researchers in data sharing |
author |
Monteiro, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar |
author_facet |
Monteiro, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar Sant'Ana, Ricardo César Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sant'Ana, Ricardo César Gonçalves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monteiro, Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar Sant'Ana, Ricardo César Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
anomia compartilhamento de dados dados de pesquisa anomie data sharing research data |
topic |
anomia compartilhamento de dados dados de pesquisa anomie data sharing research data |
description |
Data sharing is standard practice in some disciplines, while in others it is particularly critical, depending on factors such as individual researchers’ behavior or disciplinary culture. Anomie in data sharing can occur when the sets of cultural values that govern the researcher’ conduct and institutional goals are out of balance, with cultural values or vested interests having greater relevance than institutional goals. Thus, individuals perceive themselves in disagreement with what institutions require and practice deviant behaviors, with possible data retention . The objective was to identify and discuss factors that can establish a state of anomie in researchers in the data sharing process, presenting a framework with the identified factors. The collection occurred through triangulation with the application of a questionnaire, a structured interview, and document analysis. With the documentary analysis, a framework with thirteen indexes was presented, based on the theoretical frameworks, W. Richard Scott's Institutional Theory, Icek Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior, and Youngseek Kim's proposed data repository sharing behavior research model. It is concluded that anomie is related to factors such as lack of clarity of laws and regulations, imbalance between institutional goals and the ways to achieve them, non-compliance with rules, and denial of morals. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122627 10.19132/1808-5245.29.122627 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122627 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19132/1808-5245.29.122627 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122627/87765 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar Monteiro, Ricardo César Gonçalves Sant'Ana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Elizabete Cristina de Souza de Aguiar Monteiro, Ricardo César Gonçalves Sant'Ana https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122627 Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122627 Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 122627 1808-5245 1807-8893 reponame:Em Questão (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
collection |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1789438636708593664 |