Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez, Köhler, André Fontan, Delgado, Karina Valdivia, Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295
Resumo: The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence.
id UFRGS-8_6a4bd429f298541b51edabf0f26d48dc
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/101295
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic productionCaracterizando o processo de doutoramento no Brasil ao longo dos anos: período de formação, sexo e produção acadêmicaCientometriaDoutoramentoProdução científicaGrandes áreas de atuaçãoSexo/GêneroScientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender.The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence.O estudo da produção científica e da formação acadêmica em um país, área ou mesmo instituição é uma das principais funções da cientometria; por exemplo, ao conseguir apontar quais instituições têm fornecido mais alto retorno à sociedade. Este artigo analisa o universo de indivíduos que, de 1970 a 2016, concluíram ou orientaram um doutorado, com base em dados extraídos de currículos cadastrados na Plataforma Lattes; esse conjunto totaliza 174.318 indivíduos, a partir do qual se traça um amplo panorama do processo de doutoramento no Brasil. Especial atenção é dedicada ao sexo dos orientados e orientadores, inclusive as quatro configurações possíveis de ocorrer entre eles, bem como às diferenças existentes entre as nove grandes áreas de atuação. Além do processo de doutoramento em si, analisa-se a produção científica dos orientados, com e sem parceria com o orientador, o tempo de ligação entre eles, e a parcela de orientados que permanece no meio acadêmico. Os resultados mostram crescente participação feminina, com a porcentagem de orientadas tendo ultrapassado a de orientados, em 2000, e a de orientadoras aparentando seguir a mesma tendência, mas com 20 anos de atraso. Mostram também um crescimento na produção de artigos em periódicos e uma queda na porcentagem de orientados que segue carreira acadêmica, aspecto em que o ano de conclusão do doutorado mostrou-se o fator com mais alta influência.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2020-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/10129510.19132/1808-5245271.361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-3871808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295/59069Copyright (c) 2020 Luciano Antonio Digiampietri, Esteban Fernandez Tuesta, André Fontan Köhler, Karina Valdivia Delgado, João Luiz Bernardes Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDigiampietri, Luciano AntonioTuesta, Esteban FernandezKöhler, André FontanDelgado, Karina ValdiviaBernardes Júnior, João Luiz2023-11-29T18:41:39Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/101295Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2023-11-29T18:41:39Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
Caracterizando o processo de doutoramento no Brasil ao longo dos anos: período de formação, sexo e produção acadêmica
title Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
spellingShingle Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio
Cientometria
Doutoramento
Produção científica
Grandes áreas de atuação
Sexo/Gênero
Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender.
title_short Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
title_full Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
title_fullStr Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
title_sort Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
author Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio
author_facet Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio
Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez
Köhler, André Fontan
Delgado, Karina Valdivia
Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz
author_role author
author2 Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez
Köhler, André Fontan
Delgado, Karina Valdivia
Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio
Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez
Köhler, André Fontan
Delgado, Karina Valdivia
Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cientometria
Doutoramento
Produção científica
Grandes áreas de atuação
Sexo/Gênero
Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender.
topic Cientometria
Doutoramento
Produção científica
Grandes áreas de atuação
Sexo/Gênero
Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender.
description The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295
10.19132/1808-5245271.361-387
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245271.361-387
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295/59069
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387
Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387
Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1789438635994513408