Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Em Questão (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295 |
Resumo: | The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence. |
id |
UFRGS-8_6a4bd429f298541b51edabf0f26d48dc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/101295 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-8 |
network_name_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic productionCaracterizando o processo de doutoramento no Brasil ao longo dos anos: período de formação, sexo e produção acadêmicaCientometriaDoutoramentoProdução científicaGrandes áreas de atuaçãoSexo/GêneroScientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender.The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence.O estudo da produção científica e da formação acadêmica em um país, área ou mesmo instituição é uma das principais funções da cientometria; por exemplo, ao conseguir apontar quais instituições têm fornecido mais alto retorno à sociedade. Este artigo analisa o universo de indivíduos que, de 1970 a 2016, concluíram ou orientaram um doutorado, com base em dados extraídos de currículos cadastrados na Plataforma Lattes; esse conjunto totaliza 174.318 indivíduos, a partir do qual se traça um amplo panorama do processo de doutoramento no Brasil. Especial atenção é dedicada ao sexo dos orientados e orientadores, inclusive as quatro configurações possíveis de ocorrer entre eles, bem como às diferenças existentes entre as nove grandes áreas de atuação. Além do processo de doutoramento em si, analisa-se a produção científica dos orientados, com e sem parceria com o orientador, o tempo de ligação entre eles, e a parcela de orientados que permanece no meio acadêmico. Os resultados mostram crescente participação feminina, com a porcentagem de orientadas tendo ultrapassado a de orientados, em 2000, e a de orientadoras aparentando seguir a mesma tendência, mas com 20 anos de atraso. Mostram também um crescimento na produção de artigos em periódicos e uma queda na porcentagem de orientados que segue carreira acadêmica, aspecto em que o ano de conclusão do doutorado mostrou-se o fator com mais alta influência.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2020-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/10129510.19132/1808-5245271.361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-3871808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295/59069Copyright (c) 2020 Luciano Antonio Digiampietri, Esteban Fernandez Tuesta, André Fontan Köhler, Karina Valdivia Delgado, João Luiz Bernardes Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDigiampietri, Luciano AntonioTuesta, Esteban FernandezKöhler, André FontanDelgado, Karina ValdiviaBernardes Júnior, João Luiz2023-11-29T18:41:39Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/101295Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2023-11-29T18:41:39Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production Caracterizando o processo de doutoramento no Brasil ao longo dos anos: período de formação, sexo e produção acadêmica |
title |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
spellingShingle |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Cientometria Doutoramento Produção científica Grandes áreas de atuação Sexo/Gênero Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender. |
title_short |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
title_full |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
title_fullStr |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
title_sort |
Characterizing the doctoral process in Brazil over the years: period of training and academic production |
author |
Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio |
author_facet |
Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez Köhler, André Fontan Delgado, Karina Valdivia Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez Köhler, André Fontan Delgado, Karina Valdivia Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Digiampietri, Luciano Antonio Tuesta, Esteban Fernandez Köhler, André Fontan Delgado, Karina Valdivia Bernardes Júnior, João Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cientometria Doutoramento Produção científica Grandes áreas de atuação Sexo/Gênero Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender. |
topic |
Cientometria Doutoramento Produção científica Grandes áreas de atuação Sexo/Gênero Scientometrics. Doctorate. Scientific production. Major areas of knowledge. Gender. |
description |
The study of scientific production and academic training in a country, area or even an institution is one of the main functions of scientometrics, for example pointing out which ones have provided the highest return to society. This paper analyzes the universe of 174,318 individuals who, from 1970 to 2016, completed or supervised a Ph.D., based on data extracted from curricula registered in the Lattes Platform, outlining a broad panorama of the doctoral process in Brazil in the period. Special attention is given to the gender of the advisers and advisors, including the four possible configurations that may occur between them, as well as the differences between the nine major areas of knowledge. In addition to the doctoral process itself, this article assesses the scientific production of the advisee, with and without collaboration with the advisor, the relationship period between them and the percentage of the advisers who remain in the academic environment. The results show increasing female participation in the process, with the percentage of supervised women having surpassed that of supervised men in 2000 and that of supervisors’ women appearing to follow the same trend, but with a 20-year delay. They also show an increase in the production of journals' papers by the students, a drop in the percentage of students who follow an academic career, an aspect in which the year of finishing the Ph.D. showed to be the factor with the greatest influence. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295 10.19132/1808-5245271.361-387 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19132/1808-5245271.361-387 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/101295/59069 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387 Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387 Em Questão; v. 27, n. 1, jan./mar. 2021; 361-387 1808-5245 1807-8893 reponame:Em Questão (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
collection |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1789438635994513408 |