Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Ana Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/84881
Resumo: This study presents part of the results of a master’s degree research that investigated the lack of methodologies in the literature of Librarianship and Information Science (IS) for the subject analysis of legal ruling documents. As the analysis of rulings is essentially subjective, systematized methodological procedures are necessary to make it more objective and thus, obtain greater consistency in the thematic representation of information. In this context, the aim of the study was to develop a methodology for systematizing the rulings  analysis  to minimize the subjectivity that is inherent to the analysis process of this type of document during technical reading. This is an exploratory, qualitative, applied case study conducted at the Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Minas Gerais (Court of Audit of the state of Minas Gerais). Based on theoretical-conceptual contributions of Librarianship, Information Science and Law, a model for the technical reading of rulings from the court of audit was developed. The model’s framework consisted of the document thematic structure, identification of essential concepts based on questions, use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies, and adoption of categories of thematic analysis defined by Guimarães. The results of the study indicate that the systematized practice of subject analysis can facilitate the analysis process when the methodological procedures for the indexer carrying out the activity are clearly defined.
id UFRGS-8_74e4ea4377788109aad218b334538dd4
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/84881
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading modelMetodologia para a análise de assunto de acórdãos no contexto do controle externo: proposta de um modelo de leitura técnicaAnálise de assunto. Indexação. Modelo de leitura técnica. Estratégias de leitura. Acórdão. Tribunal de contas.Subject analysis. Indexing. Technical reading model. Reading strategies. Rulings. Court of auditThis study presents part of the results of a master’s degree research that investigated the lack of methodologies in the literature of Librarianship and Information Science (IS) for the subject analysis of legal ruling documents. As the analysis of rulings is essentially subjective, systematized methodological procedures are necessary to make it more objective and thus, obtain greater consistency in the thematic representation of information. In this context, the aim of the study was to develop a methodology for systematizing the rulings  analysis  to minimize the subjectivity that is inherent to the analysis process of this type of document during technical reading. This is an exploratory, qualitative, applied case study conducted at the Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Minas Gerais (Court of Audit of the state of Minas Gerais). Based on theoretical-conceptual contributions of Librarianship, Information Science and Law, a model for the technical reading of rulings from the court of audit was developed. The model’s framework consisted of the document thematic structure, identification of essential concepts based on questions, use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies, and adoption of categories of thematic analysis defined by Guimarães. The results of the study indicate that the systematized practice of subject analysis can facilitate the analysis process when the methodological procedures for the indexer carrying out the activity are clearly defined.Apresenta parte dos resultados de uma pesquisa de mestrado que investigou o problema da carência de metodologias na literatura da Biblioteconomia e da Ciência da Informação, para a análise de assunto de documentos jurídicos do tipo acórdão. Sendo a análise de assunto essencialmente subjetiva, são necessários procedimentos metodológicos sistematizados para objetivá-la e, assim, obter maior consistência na representação temática da informação. Nesse contexto, a pesquisa teve como objetivo desenvolver uma metodologia para a sistematização da análise de assunto do acórdão, visando minimizar a subjetividade inerente ao processo de análise desse documento durante a leitura técnica. A metodologia adotada na pesquisa foi caracterizada como qualitativa, exploratória e de natureza aplicada, na forma de um estudo de caso, no âmbito do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Minas Gerais. A partir de aportes teórico-conceituais da Biblioteconomia, Ciência da Informação e Direito, construiu-se um modelo de leitura técnica de acórdãos dos tribunais de contas, cujos fundamentos são a estrutura temática desse documento; a identificação de conceitos essenciais a partir de questionamentos; o uso de estratégias cognitivas e metacognitvas de leitura; e a adoção das categorias de análise temática definidas por Guimarães. Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que a prática sistematizada da análise de assunto pode objetivar o processo de análise ao definir os procedimentos metodológicos para o indexador realizar a atividade.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2019-08-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/8488110.19132/1808-5245253.99-131Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-131Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-131Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-1311808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/84881/52762Copyright (c) 2019 Ana Carolina Ferreira, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculanhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Ana CarolinaMaculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos2024-03-20T17:25:43Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/84881Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-20T17:25:43Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
Metodologia para a análise de assunto de acórdãos no contexto do controle externo: proposta de um modelo de leitura técnica
title Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
spellingShingle Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
Ferreira, Ana Carolina
Análise de assunto. Indexação. Modelo de leitura técnica. Estratégias de leitura. Acórdão. Tribunal de contas.
Subject analysis. Indexing. Technical reading model. Reading strategies. Rulings. Court of audit
title_short Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
title_full Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
title_fullStr Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
title_full_unstemmed Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
title_sort Methodology for the analysis of rulings in the context of external control: proposal for a technical reading model
author Ferreira, Ana Carolina
author_facet Ferreira, Ana Carolina
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
author_role author
author2 Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Ana Carolina
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Análise de assunto. Indexação. Modelo de leitura técnica. Estratégias de leitura. Acórdão. Tribunal de contas.
Subject analysis. Indexing. Technical reading model. Reading strategies. Rulings. Court of audit
topic Análise de assunto. Indexação. Modelo de leitura técnica. Estratégias de leitura. Acórdão. Tribunal de contas.
Subject analysis. Indexing. Technical reading model. Reading strategies. Rulings. Court of audit
description This study presents part of the results of a master’s degree research that investigated the lack of methodologies in the literature of Librarianship and Information Science (IS) for the subject analysis of legal ruling documents. As the analysis of rulings is essentially subjective, systematized methodological procedures are necessary to make it more objective and thus, obtain greater consistency in the thematic representation of information. In this context, the aim of the study was to develop a methodology for systematizing the rulings  analysis  to minimize the subjectivity that is inherent to the analysis process of this type of document during technical reading. This is an exploratory, qualitative, applied case study conducted at the Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Minas Gerais (Court of Audit of the state of Minas Gerais). Based on theoretical-conceptual contributions of Librarianship, Information Science and Law, a model for the technical reading of rulings from the court of audit was developed. The model’s framework consisted of the document thematic structure, identification of essential concepts based on questions, use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies, and adoption of categories of thematic analysis defined by Guimarães. The results of the study indicate that the systematized practice of subject analysis can facilitate the analysis process when the methodological procedures for the indexer carrying out the activity are clearly defined.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/84881
10.19132/1808-5245253.99-131
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/84881
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245253.99-131
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/84881/52762
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ana Carolina Ferreira, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Ana Carolina Ferreira, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-131
Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-131
Em Questão; v. 25, n. 3, set./dez. 2019; 99-131
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766161087266816