Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stickney, Jeff
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação & Realidade
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759
Resumo: Invited to survey my work in Philosophy of Education related to the later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, I first investigate how Wittgenstein became a significant thinker in this field. Affirming this connection after some deflationary remarks, clarifying the philosophical as opposed to pedagogical intent of Wittgenstein’s frequent remarks on learning, I then revisit my contest with Michael Luntley over interpreting Wittgenstein’s remarks on training. Eliding the Abrichtung, ‘animal-training’ reading, I side with José Medina’s social-normative view of gradually attaining (through training), autonomy within and mastery of the rules. Following the widely shared social-normative reading then opens a vista onto several meaningful applications in education of Wittgenstein’s post-foundational philosophy. One case is rule-deviation within curriculum reforms, where instead of standardization and consensus we find multiple interpretations of curricular rules. Another vexing question is how we judge with some degree of certainty the efficacy or sanity of various pedagogical practices, as in weighing the merits of discovery versus fundamentals approaches in math training. Recognizing how people become potentially blinded by long-held, second-nature reactions and ‘bedrock’ assumptions, and drawing also on Foucault, I consider applications to social justice issues in terms of how we commonly regard others: diagnosing students as ADHD or Gifted, calling out abusive language in schools, recognizing Indigenous claims for sovereignty in a process of decolonizing education, and seeing trees and other non-human beings as something more than standing resources.
id UFRGS-9_79b92adb6810c1a45e694a0c73905cb5
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/106759
network_acronym_str UFRGS-9
network_name_str Educação & Realidade
repository_id_str
spelling Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalismA Relevância de Wittgenstein para a Filosofia da Educação: reflexões pessoais sobre usos significativos do pós-fundacionalismoWittgensteinEducationTrainingExpert JudgmentLearning.WittgensteinEducaçãoFormaçãoJuízo EspecializadoAprendizagem.Invited to survey my work in Philosophy of Education related to the later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, I first investigate how Wittgenstein became a significant thinker in this field. Affirming this connection after some deflationary remarks, clarifying the philosophical as opposed to pedagogical intent of Wittgenstein’s frequent remarks on learning, I then revisit my contest with Michael Luntley over interpreting Wittgenstein’s remarks on training. Eliding the Abrichtung, ‘animal-training’ reading, I side with José Medina’s social-normative view of gradually attaining (through training), autonomy within and mastery of the rules. Following the widely shared social-normative reading then opens a vista onto several meaningful applications in education of Wittgenstein’s post-foundational philosophy. One case is rule-deviation within curriculum reforms, where instead of standardization and consensus we find multiple interpretations of curricular rules. Another vexing question is how we judge with some degree of certainty the efficacy or sanity of various pedagogical practices, as in weighing the merits of discovery versus fundamentals approaches in math training. Recognizing how people become potentially blinded by long-held, second-nature reactions and ‘bedrock’ assumptions, and drawing also on Foucault, I consider applications to social justice issues in terms of how we commonly regard others: diagnosing students as ADHD or Gifted, calling out abusive language in schools, recognizing Indigenous claims for sovereignty in a process of decolonizing education, and seeing trees and other non-human beings as something more than standing resources.Convidado a examinar meu trabalho em filosofia da educação relacionada à filosofia do último Ludwig Wittgenstein, primeiro investiguei como se tornou um pensador significativo neste campo. Ao afirmar esta conexão após algumas observações parciais, e ao esclarecer o propósito das frequentes observações de Wittgenstein sobre aprendizagem como filosóficas ao invés de pedagógicas, a seguir revisito minha discussão com Michael Luntley a respeito da interpretação de observações de Wittgenstein sobre treino. Ao evitar Abrichtung, leitura de ‘treinamento animal’, alinho-me com a perspectiva social-normativa de José Medina de gradativamente alcançar (por meio da formação), autonomia e domínio das regras. Seguir a leitura social-normativa amplamente compartilhada abre, então, uma perspectiva para diversas aplicações relevantes da filosofia pós-fundacional de Wittgenstein na educação. Uma questão é o desvio da regra nas reformas curriculares em que, ao invés de padronização e consenso, encontramos múltiplas interpretações de normas curriculares. Outra pergunta incômoda é como julgamos com algum grau de certeza a eficácia ou a lucidez de práticas pedagógicas variadas, como ao pesar os méritos da descoberta versus abordagens fundamentais no treino em matemática. Ao reconhecer como as pessoas podem ser potencialmente cegadas por reações antigas habituais e pressupostos ‘consolidados’, e também com base em Foucault, considero aplicações a questões de justiça social em termos de como, em geral, consideramos os outros: diagnosticar estudantes com TDAH ou superdotados, usar linguagem abusiva nas escolas, reconhecer reivindicações de indígenas pela soberania em um processo de decolonização da educação, e considerar árvores e outros seres não-humanos como algo mais do que recursos imóveis.FACED - UFRGS2020-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2020)Educação & Realidade; v. 45 n. 3 (2020)2175-62360100-3143reponame:Educação & Realidadeinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759/59008https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759/59009Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStickney, Jeff2020-11-03T11:50:32Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/106759Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidadePUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidade/oai||educreal@ufrgs.br2175-62360100-3143opendoar:2020-11-03T11:50:32Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
A Relevância de Wittgenstein para a Filosofia da Educação: reflexões pessoais sobre usos significativos do pós-fundacionalismo
title Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
spellingShingle Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
Stickney, Jeff
Wittgenstein
Education
Training
Expert Judgment
Learning.
Wittgenstein
Educação
Formação
Juízo Especializado
Aprendizagem.
title_short Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
title_full Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
title_fullStr Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
title_full_unstemmed Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
title_sort Wittgenstein’s Relevance to Philosophy of Education: personal reflections on meaningful uses of post-foundationalism
author Stickney, Jeff
author_facet Stickney, Jeff
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stickney, Jeff
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Wittgenstein
Education
Training
Expert Judgment
Learning.
Wittgenstein
Educação
Formação
Juízo Especializado
Aprendizagem.
topic Wittgenstein
Education
Training
Expert Judgment
Learning.
Wittgenstein
Educação
Formação
Juízo Especializado
Aprendizagem.
description Invited to survey my work in Philosophy of Education related to the later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, I first investigate how Wittgenstein became a significant thinker in this field. Affirming this connection after some deflationary remarks, clarifying the philosophical as opposed to pedagogical intent of Wittgenstein’s frequent remarks on learning, I then revisit my contest with Michael Luntley over interpreting Wittgenstein’s remarks on training. Eliding the Abrichtung, ‘animal-training’ reading, I side with José Medina’s social-normative view of gradually attaining (through training), autonomy within and mastery of the rules. Following the widely shared social-normative reading then opens a vista onto several meaningful applications in education of Wittgenstein’s post-foundational philosophy. One case is rule-deviation within curriculum reforms, where instead of standardization and consensus we find multiple interpretations of curricular rules. Another vexing question is how we judge with some degree of certainty the efficacy or sanity of various pedagogical practices, as in weighing the merits of discovery versus fundamentals approaches in math training. Recognizing how people become potentially blinded by long-held, second-nature reactions and ‘bedrock’ assumptions, and drawing also on Foucault, I consider applications to social justice issues in terms of how we commonly regard others: diagnosing students as ADHD or Gifted, calling out abusive language in schools, recognizing Indigenous claims for sovereignty in a process of decolonizing education, and seeing trees and other non-human beings as something more than standing resources.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759/59008
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/106759/59009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação & Realidade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 45 No. 3 (2020)
Educação & Realidade; v. 45 n. 3 (2020)
2175-6236
0100-3143
reponame:Educação & Realidade
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Educação & Realidade
collection Educação & Realidade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||educreal@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766988766052352