Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McDonnell, Patrick
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação & Realidade
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091
Resumo: Ideology constitutes an important site of struggle for disabled people and for Deaf communities. In recent decades two ideologies – normalisation and rights – have offered different answers to the question of what it means to be disabled or Deaf. Both ideologies emerged in the post World War II period; both challenged long-established institutional structures and professional practices; and both appealed to notions of human and civil rights. However, normalisation is fundamentally paternalistic where reform is seen to be a matter for professional expertise and to be negotiated in academic circles and in the domains of professional practice. In contrast, a rights ideology is based on a social model of disability and a socio-cultural model of deafness that oppose the exclusion of disabled and Deaf people from strategic and participative roles in defining the issues, in policy making, and in decision taking. Where normalisation seeks to eradicate or attenuate difference, a rights’ perspective advocates recognition and respect for difference; where normalising ideology looks to expertise and organisational change for solutions, disability movements and Deaf communities argue that the most satisfactory answers are to be found in the fields of politics and power.
id UFRGS-9_7bb19421b09faaf2ac05ef9c94ee0e6c
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61091
network_acronym_str UFRGS-9
network_name_str Educação & Realidade
repository_id_str
spelling Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first CenturiesDeficiência, Surdez e Ideologia no Final do Século XX e Início do Século XXIDeaf community. Disability. Ideology. Normalisation. Rights.Comunidade Surda. Deficiência. Ideologia. Normalização. Direitos.Ideology constitutes an important site of struggle for disabled people and for Deaf communities. In recent decades two ideologies – normalisation and rights – have offered different answers to the question of what it means to be disabled or Deaf. Both ideologies emerged in the post World War II period; both challenged long-established institutional structures and professional practices; and both appealed to notions of human and civil rights. However, normalisation is fundamentally paternalistic where reform is seen to be a matter for professional expertise and to be negotiated in academic circles and in the domains of professional practice. In contrast, a rights ideology is based on a social model of disability and a socio-cultural model of deafness that oppose the exclusion of disabled and Deaf people from strategic and participative roles in defining the issues, in policy making, and in decision taking. Where normalisation seeks to eradicate or attenuate difference, a rights’ perspective advocates recognition and respect for difference; where normalising ideology looks to expertise and organisational change for solutions, disability movements and Deaf communities argue that the most satisfactory answers are to be found in the fields of politics and power.A ideologia constitui um importante campo de luta para pessoas com deficiência e para as comunidades Surdas. Nas últimas décadas, duas ideologias – a da normalização e a dos direitos – têm oferecido diferentes respostas à questão do que significa ser deficiente ou Surdo. Ambas as ideologias emergiram no período após a Segunda Guerra Mundial, desafiaram práticas profissionais e estruturas institucionais há muito estabelecidas e recorreram às noções de direitos civis e humanos. Contudo, a da normalização é fundamentalmente paternalista na medida em que a correção é vista como uma questão de competência profissional, negociada em círculos acadêmicos e domínios de prática profissional. Em comparação, uma ideologia dos direitos é baseada em um modelo social de deficiência e em um modelo sociocultural de surdez que se opõem à exclusão dos Surdos e das pessoas com deficiência de funções estratégicas e participativas na definição de problemas, na formulação de políticas e na tomada de decisões. Enquanto a normalização procura erradicar ou atenuar a diferença, uma perspectiva dos direitos defende o reconhecimento e o respeito à diferença; enquanto a ideologia normalizadora busca soluções na competência e nas mudanças organizacionais, os movimentos de pessoas com deficiência e das comunidades Surdas defendem que respostas mais satisfatórias podem ser encontradas no campo da política e do poder.FACED - UFRGS2016-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 41 No. 3 (2016)Educação & Realidade; v. 41 n. 3 (2016)2175-62360100-3143reponame:Educação & Realidadeinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091/48059https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091/48060McDonnell, Patrickinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-04-30T19:19:37Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/61091Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidadePUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidade/oai||educreal@ufrgs.br2175-62360100-3143opendoar:2018-04-30T19:19:37Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
Deficiência, Surdez e Ideologia no Final do Século XX e Início do Século XXI
title Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
spellingShingle Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
McDonnell, Patrick
Deaf community. Disability. Ideology. Normalisation. Rights.
Comunidade Surda. Deficiência. Ideologia. Normalização. Direitos.
title_short Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
title_full Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
title_fullStr Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
title_full_unstemmed Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
title_sort Disability, Deafness and Ideology in the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first Centuries
author McDonnell, Patrick
author_facet McDonnell, Patrick
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McDonnell, Patrick
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Deaf community. Disability. Ideology. Normalisation. Rights.
Comunidade Surda. Deficiência. Ideologia. Normalização. Direitos.
topic Deaf community. Disability. Ideology. Normalisation. Rights.
Comunidade Surda. Deficiência. Ideologia. Normalização. Direitos.
description Ideology constitutes an important site of struggle for disabled people and for Deaf communities. In recent decades two ideologies – normalisation and rights – have offered different answers to the question of what it means to be disabled or Deaf. Both ideologies emerged in the post World War II period; both challenged long-established institutional structures and professional practices; and both appealed to notions of human and civil rights. However, normalisation is fundamentally paternalistic where reform is seen to be a matter for professional expertise and to be negotiated in academic circles and in the domains of professional practice. In contrast, a rights ideology is based on a social model of disability and a socio-cultural model of deafness that oppose the exclusion of disabled and Deaf people from strategic and participative roles in defining the issues, in policy making, and in decision taking. Where normalisation seeks to eradicate or attenuate difference, a rights’ perspective advocates recognition and respect for difference; where normalising ideology looks to expertise and organisational change for solutions, disability movements and Deaf communities argue that the most satisfactory answers are to be found in the fields of politics and power.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091/48059
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/61091/48060
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FACED - UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 41 No. 3 (2016)
Educação & Realidade; v. 41 n. 3 (2016)
2175-6236
0100-3143
reponame:Educação & Realidade
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Educação & Realidade
collection Educação & Realidade
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||educreal@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766986722377728