Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antoun Netto, Sergio Orlando
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fortunato, Bruna Quintan, Bonato, André Geffer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/48250
Resumo: We discuss a qualitative analysis of the efficiency of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System Monitoring (RBMC) using the Complex Holographic Assessment of Paradoxical Problems method (CHAP²), whose premise is the organization of intersubjectivity facilitated by the use of visual representation of structured knowledge (conceptual mapping) to increase the degree of consciousness to manage the paradoxes resulting from the complexity of living systems. We also describe a quantitative evaluation using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) allowing a ranking in terms of efficiency for further assessment by a professional of the area. The outcome of this study would be useful for IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) managers to be aware, for instance, of the suppliers and manufacturers of equipment available (receiver and geodetic antenna, Internet connection and constant supply of electricity) in efficient and ineffective stations, to guide new acquisitions, among other applications. 
id UFRJ-21_8e3ef567a3b3e85479c497b2d601e6cc
oai_identifier_str oai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/48250
network_acronym_str UFRJ-21
network_name_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)Efficiency; Cognitive mapping; Data envelopment analysisWe discuss a qualitative analysis of the efficiency of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System Monitoring (RBMC) using the Complex Holographic Assessment of Paradoxical Problems method (CHAP²), whose premise is the organization of intersubjectivity facilitated by the use of visual representation of structured knowledge (conceptual mapping) to increase the degree of consciousness to manage the paradoxes resulting from the complexity of living systems. We also describe a quantitative evaluation using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) allowing a ranking in terms of efficiency for further assessment by a professional of the area. The outcome of this study would be useful for IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) managers to be aware, for instance, of the suppliers and manufacturers of equipment available (receiver and geodetic antenna, Internet connection and constant supply of electricity) in efficient and ineffective stations, to guide new acquisitions, among other applications. Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroFAPERJAntoun Netto, Sergio OrlandoFortunato, Bruna QuintanBonato, André Geffer2022-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/4825010.11137/1982-3908_2022_45_48250Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 45 (2022)Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 45 (2022)1982-39080101-9759reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJenghttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/48250/pdf/*ref*/Antoun Netto, S.O. 2012, ‘O uso de Multimetodologia para a determinação de Metas e Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Municipal na Área da Saúde’. Tese (Doutorado), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro./*ref*/Banker, R.D., Charnes A. & Cooper, W.W. 1984, ‘Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis’, Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1031-1142, DOI:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078./*ref*/Behars, J.O. 1985, Unity and Multiplicity: Multilevel Consciousness of Self in Hypnosis, Psychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Bruner Meisel U, New York./*ref*/Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K.G. (eds). 2012, Social Metacognition, Psychology Press, East Sussex./*ref*/Castellani, B. & Hafferty, F. 2010, Sociology and Complexity Science, Springer, Berlin./*ref*/Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. 1978, ‘Measuring efficiency of decision-making units’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429-444, DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8./*ref*/Estellita Lins, M.P., Antoun Netto, S.O. & de Castro Lobo, M.S. 2019, ‘Multimethodology applied to the evaluation of Healthcare in Brazilian municipalities’, Health Care Management Science, vol. 22, pp. 197–214, DOI;10.1007/s10729-018-9432-z./*ref*/Estellita Lins, M.P., Pamplona, L., Estellita Lins, A.B. & Lyra, K.F. 2021, ‘Metacognitive attitude for decision-making at a University Hospital’, International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 1, pp. 1-21, DOI:10.1111/itor.12975./*ref*/Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. & Lovell, C.A.K. 1985, The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Springer, Dordrecht./*ref*/Färe, R. & Lovell, C.A.K. 1978, ‘Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 150-162, DOI:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1./*ref*/Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. & Mastrogiacomo, L. 2008, Properties of performance indicators in operations management – a reference framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 137–155, DOI:10.1108/17410400810847401./*ref*/Golany, B. & Roll, Y. 1989, ‘An Application Procedure for DEA, OMEGA’, International Journal of Management Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 237-250./*ref*/Hyerle, D. 2009, Visual Tools for transforming Information into Knowledge, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks./*ref*/IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2017, viewed 06 January 2017, <http://www.ibge.gov.br/>./*ref*/Koopmans, T.C. 1951, ‘Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities’, in T.C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles commission. Wiley, New York, pp. 33–97./*ref*/Lins, M.E.; Oliveira, L.B.; da Silva, A.C.M.; Rosa, L.P.; Pereira, A.O. 2011. Performance assessment of Alternative Energy Resources in Brazilian power sector using Data Envelopment Analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 16, p. 898-903./*ref*/Lins, M.P.E. & Antoun Netto, S.O. 2018, Estruturação de Problemas Sociais Complexos: Teoria da Mente, Mapas Metacognitivos e Modelos de Apoio à Decisão, Editora Interciência Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro./*ref*/Malle, B.F. & Hodges, S.D., 2005, Other Minds, How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others, Guilford, New York./*ref*/Midgley, G. 2000, Systemic Intervention, Philosophy, Methodology and Practice, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht./*ref*/Mingers, J. 2006, Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science, Springer, Berlin./*ref*/Mobus, J.E. & Kalton, M.C. 2015, Principles of Systems Science, Springer, Berlin./*ref*/Monico, J.F.G. 2007, Posicionamento pelo GNSS – Descrição, Fundamentos e Aplicações, Editora Unesp, São Paulo./*ref*/Novak, J.D. 1998, Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations, Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Mahwah./*ref*/Okada, A., Buckingham, S. & Sherborne, T. 2014, Knowledge Cartography: software tools and mapping techniques, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, London./*ref*/Pereira, T.F., Montevechi, J.A.B., Miranda, R.C. & Friend, J.D. 2014, ‘Integrating soft systems methodology to aid simulation conceptual modeling’, International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 265–285, DOI:10.1111/itor.12133./*ref*/Rosenhead, J. & Mingers, J. 2001, Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, 2nd edn, Wiley, Chichester./*ref*/Ruiz-Moreno, L., Sonzogno, M.C., Batista, S.H.S.E. & Batista, N.A. 2007, ‘Mapa conceitual: ensaiando critérios de análise’, Ciência Educação, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 453–463, DOI:10.1590/S1516-73132007000300012./*ref*/Scheel, H. 2001, ‘Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 400–410, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0./*ref*/Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J. 2002 ‘Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 16–20, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4./*ref*/Sherman, H.D. & Zhu, J. 2006, Service productivity management: improving service performance using data envelopment Analysis (DEA), Springer, Boston./*ref*/Stewart, T.J. 1996, ‘Relationships Between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis’, Journal of the Operations Research Society, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654-665, DOI:10.2307/3010016./*ref*/Suchman, A.L., Sluyter, D.J. & Williamson, P.R. 2011, Leading Change in Healthcare—Transforming Organizations Using Complexity, Positive Psychology and Relationship-Centered Care, Radcliffe Publishing, Abingdon./*ref*/Tarricone, P. 2011, The Taxonomy of Metacognition, Psychology Press, East Sussex./*ref*/Tone, K. 2001, ‘A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498-509, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5./*ref*/Vekiri, I. 2002, ‘What is the value of graphical displays in learning?’ Educational Psychology Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 261–312, DOI:10.1023/A:1016064429161./*ref*/Watkins, J. & Watkins, H. 1997, Ego States: Theory and Therapy, WW Norton and Company, New York./*ref*/Wu, J., Liang, L. & Song, M. 2010, ‘Performance based clustering for benchmarking of container ports: an application of DEA and cluster analysis technique’, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 709–722.Copyright (c) 2022 Anuário do Instituto de Geociênciashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-28T20:46:28Zoai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/48250Revistahttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/oaianuario@igeo.ufrj.br||1982-39080101-9759opendoar:2022-12-28T20:46:28Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
title Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
spellingShingle Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
Antoun Netto, Sergio Orlando
Efficiency; Cognitive mapping; Data envelopment analysis
title_short Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
title_full Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
title_fullStr Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
title_sort Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Performance of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Monitoring (RBMC)
author Antoun Netto, Sergio Orlando
author_facet Antoun Netto, Sergio Orlando
Fortunato, Bruna Quintan
Bonato, André Geffer
author_role author
author2 Fortunato, Bruna Quintan
Bonato, André Geffer
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv FAPERJ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antoun Netto, Sergio Orlando
Fortunato, Bruna Quintan
Bonato, André Geffer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Efficiency; Cognitive mapping; Data envelopment analysis
topic Efficiency; Cognitive mapping; Data envelopment analysis
description We discuss a qualitative analysis of the efficiency of the Brazilian Network for Continuous Global Navigation Satellite System Monitoring (RBMC) using the Complex Holographic Assessment of Paradoxical Problems method (CHAP²), whose premise is the organization of intersubjectivity facilitated by the use of visual representation of structured knowledge (conceptual mapping) to increase the degree of consciousness to manage the paradoxes resulting from the complexity of living systems. We also describe a quantitative evaluation using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) allowing a ranking in terms of efficiency for further assessment by a professional of the area. The outcome of this study would be useful for IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics) managers to be aware, for instance, of the suppliers and manufacturers of equipment available (receiver and geodetic antenna, Internet connection and constant supply of electricity) in efficient and ineffective stations, to guide new acquisitions, among other applications. 
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/48250
10.11137/1982-3908_2022_45_48250
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/48250
identifier_str_mv 10.11137/1982-3908_2022_45_48250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/48250/pdf
/*ref*/Antoun Netto, S.O. 2012, ‘O uso de Multimetodologia para a determinação de Metas e Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Municipal na Área da Saúde’. Tese (Doutorado), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
/*ref*/Banker, R.D., Charnes A. & Cooper, W.W. 1984, ‘Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis’, Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1031-1142, DOI:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.
/*ref*/Behars, J.O. 1985, Unity and Multiplicity: Multilevel Consciousness of Self in Hypnosis, Psychiatric Disorder and Mental Health, Bruner Meisel U, New York.
/*ref*/Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K.G. (eds). 2012, Social Metacognition, Psychology Press, East Sussex.
/*ref*/Castellani, B. & Hafferty, F. 2010, Sociology and Complexity Science, Springer, Berlin.
/*ref*/Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. 1978, ‘Measuring efficiency of decision-making units’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429-444, DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
/*ref*/Estellita Lins, M.P., Antoun Netto, S.O. & de Castro Lobo, M.S. 2019, ‘Multimethodology applied to the evaluation of Healthcare in Brazilian municipalities’, Health Care Management Science, vol. 22, pp. 197–214, DOI;10.1007/s10729-018-9432-z.
/*ref*/Estellita Lins, M.P., Pamplona, L., Estellita Lins, A.B. & Lyra, K.F. 2021, ‘Metacognitive attitude for decision-making at a University Hospital’, International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 1, pp. 1-21, DOI:10.1111/itor.12975.
/*ref*/Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. & Lovell, C.A.K. 1985, The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Springer, Dordrecht.
/*ref*/Färe, R. & Lovell, C.A.K. 1978, ‘Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Production’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 150-162, DOI:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1.
/*ref*/Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. & Mastrogiacomo, L. 2008, Properties of performance indicators in operations management – a reference framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 137–155, DOI:10.1108/17410400810847401.
/*ref*/Golany, B. & Roll, Y. 1989, ‘An Application Procedure for DEA, OMEGA’, International Journal of Management Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 237-250.
/*ref*/Hyerle, D. 2009, Visual Tools for transforming Information into Knowledge, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks.
/*ref*/IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2017, viewed 06 January 2017, <http://www.ibge.gov.br/>.
/*ref*/Koopmans, T.C. 1951, ‘Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities’, in T.C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity analysis of production and allocation, Cowles commission. Wiley, New York, pp. 33–97.
/*ref*/Lins, M.E.; Oliveira, L.B.; da Silva, A.C.M.; Rosa, L.P.; Pereira, A.O. 2011. Performance assessment of Alternative Energy Resources in Brazilian power sector using Data Envelopment Analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 16, p. 898-903.
/*ref*/Lins, M.P.E. & Antoun Netto, S.O. 2018, Estruturação de Problemas Sociais Complexos: Teoria da Mente, Mapas Metacognitivos e Modelos de Apoio à Decisão, Editora Interciência Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
/*ref*/Malle, B.F. & Hodges, S.D., 2005, Other Minds, How Humans Bridge the Divide Between Self and Others, Guilford, New York.
/*ref*/Midgley, G. 2000, Systemic Intervention, Philosophy, Methodology and Practice, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
/*ref*/Mingers, J. 2006, Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science, Springer, Berlin.
/*ref*/Mobus, J.E. & Kalton, M.C. 2015, Principles of Systems Science, Springer, Berlin.
/*ref*/Monico, J.F.G. 2007, Posicionamento pelo GNSS – Descrição, Fundamentos e Aplicações, Editora Unesp, São Paulo.
/*ref*/Novak, J.D. 1998, Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations, Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Mahwah.
/*ref*/Okada, A., Buckingham, S. & Sherborne, T. 2014, Knowledge Cartography: software tools and mapping techniques, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, London.
/*ref*/Pereira, T.F., Montevechi, J.A.B., Miranda, R.C. & Friend, J.D. 2014, ‘Integrating soft systems methodology to aid simulation conceptual modeling’, International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 265–285, DOI:10.1111/itor.12133.
/*ref*/Rosenhead, J. & Mingers, J. 2001, Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, 2nd edn, Wiley, Chichester.
/*ref*/Ruiz-Moreno, L., Sonzogno, M.C., Batista, S.H.S.E. & Batista, N.A. 2007, ‘Mapa conceitual: ensaiando critérios de análise’, Ciência Educação, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 453–463, DOI:10.1590/S1516-73132007000300012.
/*ref*/Scheel, H. 2001, ‘Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 400–410, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0.
/*ref*/Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J. 2002 ‘Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 16–20, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4.
/*ref*/Sherman, H.D. & Zhu, J. 2006, Service productivity management: improving service performance using data envelopment Analysis (DEA), Springer, Boston.
/*ref*/Stewart, T.J. 1996, ‘Relationships Between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis’, Journal of the Operations Research Society, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654-665, DOI:10.2307/3010016.
/*ref*/Suchman, A.L., Sluyter, D.J. & Williamson, P.R. 2011, Leading Change in Healthcare—Transforming Organizations Using Complexity, Positive Psychology and Relationship-Centered Care, Radcliffe Publishing, Abingdon.
/*ref*/Tarricone, P. 2011, The Taxonomy of Metacognition, Psychology Press, East Sussex.
/*ref*/Tone, K. 2001, ‘A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis’, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 498-509, DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5.
/*ref*/Vekiri, I. 2002, ‘What is the value of graphical displays in learning?’ Educational Psychology Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 261–312, DOI:10.1023/A:1016064429161.
/*ref*/Watkins, J. & Watkins, H. 1997, Ego States: Theory and Therapy, WW Norton and Company, New York.
/*ref*/Wu, J., Liang, L. & Song, M. 2010, ‘Performance based clustering for benchmarking of container ports: an application of DEA and cluster analysis technique’, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 709–722.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 45 (2022)
Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol 45 (2022)
1982-3908
0101-9759
reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
collection Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv anuario@igeo.ufrj.br||
_version_ 1797053538601271296

Registros relacionados