Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Floresta e Ambiente |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400117 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the prediction of partial volumes with nonlinear mixed modeling for Pinus taeda. The volume of 558 trees was measured. The four-parameter logistic model was used in its modified form for the nonlinear mixed approach and, for comparison, the 5th degree polynomial was used. In the mixed modeling, the random effects diameter, age and place were inserted. The statistical criteria used to assess the quality of the adjustment were the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), standard error of the estimate (Syx) and residual graphical analysis. Among the random effects analyzed, age obtained the best adjustment. However, to predict partial volumes, it was noticed that, regardless of the analyzed portion of the trunk, the 5th degree polynomial had the best estimates, with a mean standard error of 20.1% of the estimate compared to 51.8% of the logistic. |
id |
UFRJ-3_01d584e3575aef5ef34962fae31dcd84 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2179-80872019000400117 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-3 |
network_name_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modelingforest biometricslogistic modeltaperABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the prediction of partial volumes with nonlinear mixed modeling for Pinus taeda. The volume of 558 trees was measured. The four-parameter logistic model was used in its modified form for the nonlinear mixed approach and, for comparison, the 5th degree polynomial was used. In the mixed modeling, the random effects diameter, age and place were inserted. The statistical criteria used to assess the quality of the adjustment were the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), standard error of the estimate (Syx) and residual graphical analysis. Among the random effects analyzed, age obtained the best adjustment. However, to predict partial volumes, it was noticed that, regardless of the analyzed portion of the trunk, the 5th degree polynomial had the best estimates, with a mean standard error of 20.1% of the estimate compared to 51.8% of the logistic.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400117Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.4 2019reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.032917info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNicoletti,Marcos FelipeCarvalho,Samuel de Pádua Chaves eMachado,Sebastião do AmaralFigueiredo Filho,AfonsoOliveira,Gustavo Silvaeng2019-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872019000400117Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2019-11-05T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
title |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
spellingShingle |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling Nicoletti,Marcos Felipe forest biometrics logistic model taper |
title_short |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
title_full |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
title_fullStr |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
title_sort |
Partial Volume Prediction Through Nonlinear Mixed Modeling |
author |
Nicoletti,Marcos Felipe |
author_facet |
Nicoletti,Marcos Felipe Carvalho,Samuel de Pádua Chaves e Machado,Sebastião do Amaral Figueiredo Filho,Afonso Oliveira,Gustavo Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho,Samuel de Pádua Chaves e Machado,Sebastião do Amaral Figueiredo Filho,Afonso Oliveira,Gustavo Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nicoletti,Marcos Felipe Carvalho,Samuel de Pádua Chaves e Machado,Sebastião do Amaral Figueiredo Filho,Afonso Oliveira,Gustavo Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
forest biometrics logistic model taper |
topic |
forest biometrics logistic model taper |
description |
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the prediction of partial volumes with nonlinear mixed modeling for Pinus taeda. The volume of 558 trees was measured. The four-parameter logistic model was used in its modified form for the nonlinear mixed approach and, for comparison, the 5th degree polynomial was used. In the mixed modeling, the random effects diameter, age and place were inserted. The statistical criteria used to assess the quality of the adjustment were the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), standard error of the estimate (Syx) and residual graphical analysis. Among the random effects analyzed, age obtained the best adjustment. However, to predict partial volumes, it was noticed that, regardless of the analyzed portion of the trunk, the 5th degree polynomial had the best estimates, with a mean standard error of 20.1% of the estimate compared to 51.8% of the logistic. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400117 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400117 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2179-8087.032917 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.4 2019 reponame:Floresta e Ambiente instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
collection |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br|| |
_version_ |
1750128142895284224 |