Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Floresta e Ambiente |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000400303 |
Resumo: | Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and substrates in the production of Samanea saman (rain tree) seedlings. Three substrates and three inoculation treatments were combined in a randomized block design with six repetitions. The Sewage Sludge substrate favored symbiosis with AMF (promoting twelve times more sporulation), while the Commercial substrate favored symbiosis with NFB (promoting 70% more nodulation). The Sewage Sludge substrate provided the best development of S. saman seedlings, as it promoted higher biomass compared to the Commercial and Standard substrates (14% and 150% respectively). The most significant response to inoculation occurred in the seedlings produced in the Standard substrate, in which the inoculated seedlings had higher biomass than those that received fertilization and those that received neither inoculation nor fertilization (20% and 50% respectively). |
id |
UFRJ-3_2fa178357ba9b1a8764fac1d95a2ba61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2179-80872021000400303 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-3 |
network_name_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling ProductionArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiNitrogen-fixing bacteriaBiosolidsRoot symbiosisRain treeAbstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and substrates in the production of Samanea saman (rain tree) seedlings. Three substrates and three inoculation treatments were combined in a randomized block design with six repetitions. The Sewage Sludge substrate favored symbiosis with AMF (promoting twelve times more sporulation), while the Commercial substrate favored symbiosis with NFB (promoting 70% more nodulation). The Sewage Sludge substrate provided the best development of S. saman seedlings, as it promoted higher biomass compared to the Commercial and Standard substrates (14% and 150% respectively). The most significant response to inoculation occurred in the seedlings produced in the Standard substrate, in which the inoculated seedlings had higher biomass than those that received fertilization and those that received neither inoculation nor fertilization (20% and 50% respectively).Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000400303Floresta e Ambiente v.28 n.4 2021reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2021-0046info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbaurre,Gustavo WyseSaggin Júnior,Orivaldo JoséFaria,Sergio Miana deeng2021-09-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872021000400303Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2021-09-24T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
title |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
spellingShingle |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production Abaurre,Gustavo Wyse Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Nitrogen-fixing bacteria Biosolids Root symbiosis Rain tree |
title_short |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
title_full |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
title_fullStr |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
title_sort |
Interaction of Substrates and Inoculants for Samanea Saman (Jacq.) Merr Seedling Production |
author |
Abaurre,Gustavo Wyse |
author_facet |
Abaurre,Gustavo Wyse Saggin Júnior,Orivaldo José Faria,Sergio Miana de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Saggin Júnior,Orivaldo José Faria,Sergio Miana de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abaurre,Gustavo Wyse Saggin Júnior,Orivaldo José Faria,Sergio Miana de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Nitrogen-fixing bacteria Biosolids Root symbiosis Rain tree |
topic |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Nitrogen-fixing bacteria Biosolids Root symbiosis Rain tree |
description |
Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and substrates in the production of Samanea saman (rain tree) seedlings. Three substrates and three inoculation treatments were combined in a randomized block design with six repetitions. The Sewage Sludge substrate favored symbiosis with AMF (promoting twelve times more sporulation), while the Commercial substrate favored symbiosis with NFB (promoting 70% more nodulation). The Sewage Sludge substrate provided the best development of S. saman seedlings, as it promoted higher biomass compared to the Commercial and Standard substrates (14% and 150% respectively). The most significant response to inoculation occurred in the seedlings produced in the Standard substrate, in which the inoculated seedlings had higher biomass than those that received fertilization and those that received neither inoculation nor fertilization (20% and 50% respectively). |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000400303 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000400303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2021-0046 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente v.28 n.4 2021 reponame:Floresta e Ambiente instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
collection |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br|| |
_version_ |
1750128143961686016 |