Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Escola Anna Nery |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-81452018000100201 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: Identify the route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations. Method: Cross-sectional study with 361 mothers from a university hospital. Data were obtained using a structured questionnaire from February to April 2013. Descriptive analysis was performed and the Chi-square test was used to verify association among the variables. Results: 77.6% of the women preferred vaginal delivery and the reason reported by 81.8% of them was easier recovery postpartum; 20.5% believed they took part in the decision-making concerning the type of delivery; 64.5% believed the type of delivery they experienced did not involve risk for themselves, while 21.9% believed it involved risk for the newborn. Statistical association was found between number of deliveries and type of previous delivery with the preferred route of delivery. Conclusion: Women did not have adequate knowledge regarding the risks and benefits of different types of delivery and for this reason were not empowered to exert their autonomy in regard to this decision. |
id |
UFRJ-4_beff11efa8031813b97f5249644c4c86 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-81452018000100201 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-4 |
network_name_str |
Escola Anna Nery |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivationsChoice BehaviorNatural ChildbirthCesarean SectionPatient PreferenceAbstract Objective: Identify the route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations. Method: Cross-sectional study with 361 mothers from a university hospital. Data were obtained using a structured questionnaire from February to April 2013. Descriptive analysis was performed and the Chi-square test was used to verify association among the variables. Results: 77.6% of the women preferred vaginal delivery and the reason reported by 81.8% of them was easier recovery postpartum; 20.5% believed they took part in the decision-making concerning the type of delivery; 64.5% believed the type of delivery they experienced did not involve risk for themselves, while 21.9% believed it involved risk for the newborn. Statistical association was found between number of deliveries and type of previous delivery with the preferred route of delivery. Conclusion: Women did not have adequate knowledge regarding the risks and benefits of different types of delivery and for this reason were not empowered to exert their autonomy in regard to this decision.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-81452018000100201Escola Anna Nery v.22 n.1 2018reponame:Escola Anna Neryinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKottwitz,FernandaGouveia,Helga GeremiasGonçalves,Annelise de Carvalhoeng2017-11-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-81452018000100201Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1414-8145ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpannaneryrevista@gmail.com||eean_revista@eean.ufrj.br||icabral444@gmail.com2177-94651414-8145opendoar:2017-11-14T00:00Escola Anna Nery - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
title |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
spellingShingle |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations Kottwitz,Fernanda Choice Behavior Natural Childbirth Cesarean Section Patient Preference |
title_short |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
title_full |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
title_fullStr |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
title_sort |
Route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations |
author |
Kottwitz,Fernanda |
author_facet |
Kottwitz,Fernanda Gouveia,Helga Geremias Gonçalves,Annelise de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gouveia,Helga Geremias Gonçalves,Annelise de Carvalho |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kottwitz,Fernanda Gouveia,Helga Geremias Gonçalves,Annelise de Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Choice Behavior Natural Childbirth Cesarean Section Patient Preference |
topic |
Choice Behavior Natural Childbirth Cesarean Section Patient Preference |
description |
Abstract Objective: Identify the route of birth delivery preferred by mothers and their motivations. Method: Cross-sectional study with 361 mothers from a university hospital. Data were obtained using a structured questionnaire from February to April 2013. Descriptive analysis was performed and the Chi-square test was used to verify association among the variables. Results: 77.6% of the women preferred vaginal delivery and the reason reported by 81.8% of them was easier recovery postpartum; 20.5% believed they took part in the decision-making concerning the type of delivery; 64.5% believed the type of delivery they experienced did not involve risk for themselves, while 21.9% believed it involved risk for the newborn. Statistical association was found between number of deliveries and type of previous delivery with the preferred route of delivery. Conclusion: Women did not have adequate knowledge regarding the risks and benefits of different types of delivery and for this reason were not empowered to exert their autonomy in regard to this decision. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-81452018000100201 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-81452018000100201 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2017-0013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Anna Nery v.22 n.1 2018 reponame:Escola Anna Nery instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Escola Anna Nery |
collection |
Escola Anna Nery |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Escola Anna Nery - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
annaneryrevista@gmail.com||eean_revista@eean.ufrj.br||icabral444@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1750128123970584576 |