Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852017000300125 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective The present study aims to compare the diagnostic ability of the HAMD 17 items with shorter versions of 7 and 6 items. Methods A total of 133 patients from a 6 month clinical trial diagnosed with mood disorders (60.2% with Major Depressive Disorder and 39.8% with bipolar type I disorder) were recruited. Results The 17 items HAMD scale showed similar results as compared with shorter versions. Furthermore, almost all patients’ diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder scored more compared to Bipolar Disorder, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion This study allows that the use of a shorter version of HAMD might be an adequate possibility, and also that depressive symptoms were similar among groups. |
id |
UFRJ-6_5edf1b2baeb86f93b448d35e08c9afeb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0047-20852017000300125 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-6 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleDepressive disorderpsychiatric status rating scalespsychometricsfollow-up studiesABSTRACT Objective The present study aims to compare the diagnostic ability of the HAMD 17 items with shorter versions of 7 and 6 items. Methods A total of 133 patients from a 6 month clinical trial diagnosed with mood disorders (60.2% with Major Depressive Disorder and 39.8% with bipolar type I disorder) were recruited. Results The 17 items HAMD scale showed similar results as compared with shorter versions. Furthermore, almost all patients’ diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder scored more compared to Bipolar Disorder, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion This study allows that the use of a shorter version of HAMD might be an adequate possibility, and also that depressive symptoms were similar among groups.Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852017000300125Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.66 n.3 2017reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/0047-2085000000161info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarneiro,Adriana MunhozCavalcanti,AndréCarvalho,Lucas de FranciscoMoreno,Ricardo Albertoeng2017-09-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0047-20852017000300125Revistahttp://portalrev.enfermagem.bvs.br/index.php?issn=0047-2085&lang=ptONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editora@ipub.ufrj.br1982-02080047-2085opendoar:2017-09-06T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
title |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
spellingShingle |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Carneiro,Adriana Munhoz Depressive disorder psychiatric status rating scales psychometrics follow-up studies |
title_short |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
title_full |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
title_fullStr |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
title_sort |
Predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale |
author |
Carneiro,Adriana Munhoz |
author_facet |
Carneiro,Adriana Munhoz Cavalcanti,André Carvalho,Lucas de Francisco Moreno,Ricardo Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalcanti,André Carvalho,Lucas de Francisco Moreno,Ricardo Alberto |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carneiro,Adriana Munhoz Cavalcanti,André Carvalho,Lucas de Francisco Moreno,Ricardo Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Depressive disorder psychiatric status rating scales psychometrics follow-up studies |
topic |
Depressive disorder psychiatric status rating scales psychometrics follow-up studies |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective The present study aims to compare the diagnostic ability of the HAMD 17 items with shorter versions of 7 and 6 items. Methods A total of 133 patients from a 6 month clinical trial diagnosed with mood disorders (60.2% with Major Depressive Disorder and 39.8% with bipolar type I disorder) were recruited. Results The 17 items HAMD scale showed similar results as compared with shorter versions. Furthermore, almost all patients’ diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder scored more compared to Bipolar Disorder, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion This study allows that the use of a shorter version of HAMD might be an adequate possibility, and also that depressive symptoms were similar among groups. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852017000300125 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852017000300125 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0047-2085000000161 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.66 n.3 2017 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editora@ipub.ufrj.br |
_version_ |
1750128246988472320 |