La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rios, José González
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Princípios (Natal. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714
Resumo: On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerations: the maximum in an absolute sense, as contracted and finally as absolute and contracted, at the same time. In the context of the First Book, which presents the singular methodology of the docta ignorantia, considers the maximum in itself in light of the paradoxical concept of coincidentia oppositorum in the absolute. In the final chapters of this first book tackles the critical of the theological discourse and thus, the problem of the ineffable name of maximum et minimum absolutum. Hence the purpose of this work is the further on cusan’s evaluation of language problem as it shows through treatment of the theological discourses and divine names that emerge from them, in light of the way of docta ignorantia.
id UFRN-5_18b385dd87b5b7bebd5feac51f0dbce7
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/1714
network_acronym_str UFRN-5
network_name_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusadocta ignorantiacoincidentia oppositorummaximum et minimum absolutumdiscurso teológiconomes inefáveis On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerations: the maximum in an absolute sense, as contracted and finally as absolute and contracted, at the same time. In the context of the First Book, which presents the singular methodology of the docta ignorantia, considers the maximum in itself in light of the paradoxical concept of coincidentia oppositorum in the absolute. In the final chapters of this first book tackles the critical of the theological discourse and thus, the problem of the ineffable name of maximum et minimum absolutum. Hence the purpose of this work is the further on cusan’s evaluation of language problem as it shows through treatment of the theological discourses and divine names that emerge from them, in light of the way of docta ignorantia.EDUFRN2012-04-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 18 n. 30 (2011): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 27-521983-21090104-8694reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714/1179Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRios, José González2016-12-16T17:03:21Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/1714Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2016-12-16T17:03:21Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
spellingShingle La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
Rios, José González
docta ignorantia
coincidentia oppositorum
maximum et minimum absolutum
discurso teológico
nomes inefáveis
title_short La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_full La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_fullStr La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_full_unstemmed La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_sort La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
author Rios, José González
author_facet Rios, José González
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rios, José González
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv docta ignorantia
coincidentia oppositorum
maximum et minimum absolutum
discurso teológico
nomes inefáveis
topic docta ignorantia
coincidentia oppositorum
maximum et minimum absolutum
discurso teológico
nomes inefáveis
description On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerations: the maximum in an absolute sense, as contracted and finally as absolute and contracted, at the same time. In the context of the First Book, which presents the singular methodology of the docta ignorantia, considers the maximum in itself in light of the paradoxical concept of coincidentia oppositorum in the absolute. In the final chapters of this first book tackles the critical of the theological discourse and thus, the problem of the ineffable name of maximum et minimum absolutum. Hence the purpose of this work is the further on cusan’s evaluation of language problem as it shows through treatment of the theological discourses and divine names that emerge from them, in light of the way of docta ignorantia.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714/1179
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 18 n. 30 (2011): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 27-52
1983-2109
0104-8694
reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
collection Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||principios@cchla.ufrn.br
_version_ 1799769977882935296