THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima Cardoso, André Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Princípios (Natal. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669
Resumo: In this article, we intend to explore the comparativist thesis about the badness of death and how it deals with the so-called Challenge of Time. According to comparativism, death can be an evil insofar as the person would be better off had he not died. However, if when we die we cease to exist, how can death be something bad? More specifically, at what point does death harm the subject? To answer this question, we will first explain what exactly the comparativist thesis consists of, and how it can argue for some prudential value of death. Next, we will explain what the challenge of time is and, finally, we will analyze the answers provided by the comparativists to the problem. We will thus seek to defend that comparativism can not only say whether a death is bad, but also how bad it can be for the individual and, in addition, that this approach proposes plausible solutions to the challenge of time.
id UFRN-5_3b19fa06c8fef8df7f13d511883fc56d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/31669
network_acronym_str UFRN-5
network_name_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIMEO Mal da Morte e o Desafio do TempoDeathHarmComparativismChallenge of TimeMorteDanoComparativismoDesafio do TempoIn this article, we intend to explore the comparativist thesis about the badness of death and how it deals with the so-called Challenge of Time. According to comparativism, death can be an evil insofar as the person would be better off had he not died. However, if when we die we cease to exist, how can death be something bad? More specifically, at what point does death harm the subject? To answer this question, we will first explain what exactly the comparativist thesis consists of, and how it can argue for some prudential value of death. Next, we will explain what the challenge of time is and, finally, we will analyze the answers provided by the comparativists to the problem. We will thus seek to defend that comparativism can not only say whether a death is bad, but also how bad it can be for the individual and, in addition, that this approach proposes plausible solutions to the challenge of time.Neste artigo, pretendemos explorar a tese comparativista sobre o mal da morte e como ela lida com o chamado Desafio do Tempo. De acordo com o comparativismo, a morte pode ser um mal na medida em que a pessoa estaria melhor, caso não tivesse falecido. No entanto, se ao morrer deixamos de existir, como a morte pode ser algo ruim? Mais especificamente, em que momento a morte prejudica o sujeito? Para responder a esta questão, primeiramente explicaremos no que consiste exatamente a tese comparativista, e como ela pode argumentar sobre algum valor prudencial da morte. Em seguida, explicaremos o que é o desafio do tempo e, por fim, analisaremos as respostas fornecidas pelos comparativistas ao problema. Buscaremos assim defender que o comparativismo pode não só dizer se uma morte é ruim, mas também o quão ruim pode ser para o indivíduo e, além disso, que essa abordagem propõe soluções plausíveis ao desafio do tempo.EDUFRN2023-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/3166910.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n61ID31669Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 30 n. 61 (2023): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 9-331983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n61reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669/17174https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669/17175Copyright (c) 2023 André Luiz Lima Cardosohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima Cardoso, André Luiz2023-07-06T12:35:33Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/31669Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2023-07-06T12:35:33Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
O Mal da Morte e o Desafio do Tempo
title THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
spellingShingle THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
Lima Cardoso, André Luiz
Death
Harm
Comparativism
Challenge of Time
Morte
Dano
Comparativismo
Desafio do Tempo
title_short THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
title_full THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
title_fullStr THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
title_full_unstemmed THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
title_sort THE BADNESS OF DEATH AND THE CHALLENGE OF TIME
author Lima Cardoso, André Luiz
author_facet Lima Cardoso, André Luiz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima Cardoso, André Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Death
Harm
Comparativism
Challenge of Time
Morte
Dano
Comparativismo
Desafio do Tempo
topic Death
Harm
Comparativism
Challenge of Time
Morte
Dano
Comparativismo
Desafio do Tempo
description In this article, we intend to explore the comparativist thesis about the badness of death and how it deals with the so-called Challenge of Time. According to comparativism, death can be an evil insofar as the person would be better off had he not died. However, if when we die we cease to exist, how can death be something bad? More specifically, at what point does death harm the subject? To answer this question, we will first explain what exactly the comparativist thesis consists of, and how it can argue for some prudential value of death. Next, we will explain what the challenge of time is and, finally, we will analyze the answers provided by the comparativists to the problem. We will thus seek to defend that comparativism can not only say whether a death is bad, but also how bad it can be for the individual and, in addition, that this approach proposes plausible solutions to the challenge of time.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669
10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n61ID31669
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n61ID31669
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669/17174
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31669/17175
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 André Luiz Lima Cardoso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 André Luiz Lima Cardoso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 30 n. 61 (2023): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 9-33
1983-2109
0104-8694
10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n61
reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
collection Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||principios@cchla.ufrn.br
_version_ 1799769979799732224