O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Rafael Bittencourt
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Princípios (Natal. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/16905
Resumo: Hume's skepticism may seem close to skeptical fideism in view of his critique of human faculties involved in the knowledge of truth and his defense of the need for a non-rational mechanism as foundation of our beliefs. The difference between them would lie in the identification of the solution to the suspension of judgment resulting from the discovery of the insufficiency of reason to understand the world and to guide action: one would point to natural determination, another to Revelation. I argue here that this closeness is no more than apparent. Hume's philosophy is constituted as antifideist not only for prudential, practical or pragmatic reasons, but also for its philosophical foundations. To show it, I examine the discussion between Demea and Philo in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, the investigation into the origin of religion in the Natural History of Religion and the reasons for the recommendation of philosophy to superstition in the Treatise of Human Nature.
id UFRN-5_3b8abfe6e5c56578809d401bb3a33d74
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/16905
network_acronym_str UFRN-5
network_name_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling O ceticismo antifideísta de HumeSkepticismFideismMisticismEmpiricismHumeCeticismoFideísmoMisticismoEmpirismoHumeHume's skepticism may seem close to skeptical fideism in view of his critique of human faculties involved in the knowledge of truth and his defense of the need for a non-rational mechanism as foundation of our beliefs. The difference between them would lie in the identification of the solution to the suspension of judgment resulting from the discovery of the insufficiency of reason to understand the world and to guide action: one would point to natural determination, another to Revelation. I argue here that this closeness is no more than apparent. Hume's philosophy is constituted as antifideist not only for prudential, practical or pragmatic reasons, but also for its philosophical foundations. To show it, I examine the discussion between Demea and Philo in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, the investigation into the origin of religion in the Natural History of Religion and the reasons for the recommendation of philosophy to superstition in the Treatise of Human Nature.O ceticismo de Hume pode parecer próximo do fideísmo cético em virtude da sua crítica às faculdades humanas envolvidas no conhecimento da verdade e da sua defesa da necessidade de um mecanismo não racional como fundamento das nossas crenças. A diferença entre ambos estaria na identificação da solução para a suspensão do juízo resultante da descoberta da insuficiência da razão para compreender o mundo e guiar a ação: um apontaria para a determinação natural, outro, para a Revelação. Argumento aqui que essa proximidade não é mais do que aparente. A filosofia de Hume constitui-se como antifideísta não apenas por razões prudenciais, práticas ou pragmáticas, mas também pelos seus fundamentos filosóficos. Para mostrá-lo, examino a discussão entre Dêmeas e Filão nos Diálogos sobre a Religião Natural, a investigação sobre a origem da religião na História Natural da Religião e as razões para a recomendação da filosofia ante a superstição no Tratado da Natureza Humana.EDUFRN2019-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1690510.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n50ID16905Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 26 n. 50 (2019): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 305-3331983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n50reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/16905/11667Copyright (c) 2019 Rafael Bittencourt Santosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Rafael Bittencourt2019-06-19T19:29:36Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/16905Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2019-06-19T19:29:36Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
title O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
spellingShingle O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
Santos, Rafael Bittencourt
Skepticism
Fideism
Misticism
Empiricism
Hume
Ceticismo
Fideísmo
Misticismo
Empirismo
Hume
title_short O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
title_full O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
title_fullStr O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
title_full_unstemmed O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
title_sort O ceticismo antifideísta de Hume
author Santos, Rafael Bittencourt
author_facet Santos, Rafael Bittencourt
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Rafael Bittencourt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Skepticism
Fideism
Misticism
Empiricism
Hume
Ceticismo
Fideísmo
Misticismo
Empirismo
Hume
topic Skepticism
Fideism
Misticism
Empiricism
Hume
Ceticismo
Fideísmo
Misticismo
Empirismo
Hume
description Hume's skepticism may seem close to skeptical fideism in view of his critique of human faculties involved in the knowledge of truth and his defense of the need for a non-rational mechanism as foundation of our beliefs. The difference between them would lie in the identification of the solution to the suspension of judgment resulting from the discovery of the insufficiency of reason to understand the world and to guide action: one would point to natural determination, another to Revelation. I argue here that this closeness is no more than apparent. Hume's philosophy is constituted as antifideist not only for prudential, practical or pragmatic reasons, but also for its philosophical foundations. To show it, I examine the discussion between Demea and Philo in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, the investigation into the origin of religion in the Natural History of Religion and the reasons for the recommendation of philosophy to superstition in the Treatise of Human Nature.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/16905
10.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n50ID16905
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/16905
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n50ID16905
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/16905/11667
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Rafael Bittencourt Santos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Rafael Bittencourt Santos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 26 n. 50 (2019): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 305-333
1983-2109
0104-8694
10.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n50
reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
collection Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||principios@cchla.ufrn.br
_version_ 1799769979120254976